Delhi High Court
59,687 judgments
SANDISK LLC & ANR v. MEMORY WORLD
The Delhi High Court granted summary judgment in favor of SanDisk LLC, restraining the defendant from selling counterfeit products bearing its registered trademarks and ordering delivery up and destruction of infringing goods.
P.N. Sethi v. Parley Biscuits Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that consultancy fees are not payable for a refund made under a government circular outside the contract, absent proof that the consultant's efforts secured the refund.
Santosh Kumari v. Mahendri & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal holding that pre-2001 unregistered and unstamped documents can confer co-ownership rights and rejected the adverse possession claim due to lack of proof.
Jasch Industries Limited v. New India Assurance Co. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal upholding that an insured's voluntary consent to a surveyor's loss assessment under reinstatement value policies is binding absent evidence of coercion or error, and rejected claims for additional compensation and interest.
Rahul Verma v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement and divorce decree, emphasizing the court's power to end futile criminal proceedings in such cases.
Sh. Daya Shanker v. The State and Another
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 324, 326, and 509 IPC based on a settlement between the parties and the complainants' unwillingness to proceed further.
Mahender Kumar v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354 and 509 IPC after the parties amicably settled their dispute and the complainant withdrew prosecution.
Yogender Gupta & Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under the Copyright and Trademarks Acts following an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's consent to discontinue prosecution.
Budhapriya Gautam v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the trial court to expedite disposal of the application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. concerning the suspicious death of the petitioner's brother.
Chander Shekhar Pandey v. The State NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 420, 468, and 471 IPC after the parties amicably settled their dispute and the complainant declined to prosecute further.
Cadila Healthcare Limited v. Competition Commission of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the CCI’s order authorizing investigation against Cadila under Section 26(1) of the Competition Act, rejecting its review and cross-examination applications, affirming the DG’s jurisdiction and procedural propriety.
Ranbir Singh v. Sajanti Ram
The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal against a decree for recovery on a dishonoured cheque, affirming that the presumption under Section 139 NI Act includes legally enforceable debt and that non-disclosure in income tax returns does not negate enforceability.
D R I v. VIPIN SEHGAL
The Delhi High Court held that in warrant cases instituted otherwise than on police report, the prosecution is entitled to examine additional witnesses at the post-charge stage beyond those examined at the pre-charge stage, setting aside the trial court's restrictive order.
Narender Kumar Manchanda v. Hemant Kumar Talwar
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's application for extension of time to furnish an undertaking, holding that the eviction order was validly executed after the petitioner abandoned the challenge and failed to comply with court directions.
Baljit Singh Redhu & Anr. v. NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Section 138 NI Act where the cheque amount was paid within the stipulated period and the complainant could not appropriate the payment against other liabilities not mentioned in the demand notice.
Yogender Kumar & Anr. v. Rajender Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the remand of a possession suit for fresh evidence to determine the validity of land allotment and title, holding that bona fide purchaser plea is no defense against the real owner.
Sunil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar Agarwal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of a contempt petition after respondents assured compliance with directions to install and man traffic barriers and CCTVs, negating the need for contempt proceedings.
Renu Yadav v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of the petitioner’s OBC certificates for CGLE 2015 due to non-compliance with prescribed format and timeline, dismissing her claim for reservation benefits.
JWO Beer Pal Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that without conclusive psychiatric evidence, the petitioner cannot be forcibly detained or evaluated and directed the respondents to grant him an interview regarding his transfer before enforcing posting.
Krishan Lal v. Land & Development Office, Ministry of Urban Development Government of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal, holding that a suit for exclusive mutation without impleading all necessary heirs and relying on a doubtful Relinquishment Deed is not maintainable.