H.B. Chaturvedi & Ors. v. Directorate of Enforcement (PMLA)

Delhi High Court · 11 Sep 2018 · 2018:DHC:8252
R.K. Gauba
CRL.M.C. 2805/2015 & connected matters
2018:DHC:8252
criminal petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed as withdrawn the pre-trial petitions filed by H.B. Chaturvedi and others challenging Enforcement Directorate proceedings under the PMLA, directing them to raise their contentions before the trial court after the summoning order.

Full Text
Translation output
$-4 to 10 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.M.C. 2805/2015 and Crl. M.A. 6967/2016
HBCHATURVEDI &ORS Petitioners
Through: Mr. Vijay Kumar Aggarwal, Ms. Hemlata Kharayat, Mr. Shailesh and Mr. Shekhar, Advocates
VERSUS
ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT(PMLA) Respondent
Through: Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC witli Mr. T.P. Singh, Advocate
CRL.M.C. 3957/2015 and Crl. M.A. 14041/2015
HB CHATURVEDI &ORS Petitioners Advocates
VERSUS
DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT( PMLA) Respondent
Through: Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC with
CRL.M.C. 3979/2015 and Crl. M.A. 14094/2015
H B CHATURVEDI & ORS Petitioners Hemlata ICharayat, Mr. Shailesh and Mr. Shekhar, Advocates
VERSUS
DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT(PMLA) Respondent
CRL.M.C. 2805/2015 &connected matters page 1of3
2018:DHC:8252 1^'
CRL.M.C. 4985/2015 and Crl. M.A. 17891/2015
H.B. CHATURVEDI &ORS pe,i,o„ers
Hemlata Kharayat, Mr. Shailesh and Mr. Shekhar Advocates
VERSUS
DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT (PMLA) Respondent
CRL.M.C. 4986/2015 and Crl. M.A. 17893/2015
H.B. CHATURVEDI &ORS pet^ioners Hemlata Kharayat, Mr. Shailesh and Mr. Shekhar Advocates
VERSUS
CRL.M.C. 494/2016 and Crl. M.A. 2072/2016
H.B. CHATURVEDI &ORS Petitioners Advocates
VERSUS
CRL.M.C. 495/2016 and Crl. MA. 2075/2016
CRL.M.C. 2805/2015 &connected matters page 2of3 f
H.B. CHATURVEDI &ORS Petitioners Advocates
VERSUS
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA
11.09.2018 At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted, on instructions, that he may be permitted to withdraw these petitions and the applications filed therewith, the petitioners reserving the right to raise all the contentions set out herein as arguments before the trial court, the summoning order having already been passed on the complaint which was filed subsequent to the filing ofthese petitions.
The petitions and the applications filed therewith are dismissed as withdrawn.
SEPTEMBER 11, 2018 yg
CRL.M.C. 2805/2015 & connected matters
.K.GAUB
JUDGMENT