Full Text
Translation output
\ i HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.M.C.2227/2017 .
SHELLY OBEROI Petitioner =
Through: Mr.Gaurav Bhatt,Adv.
CRL.M.C.2227/2017 .
SHELLY OBEROI Petitioner =
Through: Mr.Gaurav Bhatt,Adv.
VERSUS
STATE(GOVT OF NOT OF DELHI)& ORS Respondents
Through: Dr.M.P.Singh,APP for State with SI Govind Singh,P.S.Uttam Nagar.
Mr.Varun Sharma,Adv.for R-2 AND
Through: Dr.M.P.Singh,APP for State with SI Govind Singh,P.S.Uttam Nagar.
Mr.Varun Sharma,Adv.for R-2 AND
CRL.M.C.4586/2018
RAVDJDER SINGH Petitioner
Through: Mr.Varun Sharma,Adv.
RAVDJDER SINGH Petitioner
Through: Mr.Varun Sharma,Adv.
VERSUS
THE STATE
(GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI)& ANR Respondents
Through: Dr.M.P.Singh,APP for State with SI Govind Singh,P.S.Uttam Nagar.
Mr.Gaurav Bhatt,Adv.for R-2.
(GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI)& ANR Respondents
Through: Dr.M.P.Singh,APP for State with SI Govind Singh,P.S.Uttam Nagar.
Mr.Gaurav Bhatt,Adv.for R-2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.K.PATHAK
11.09.2018 It is submitted that present FIR No. 376/2014 under Sections
323/341/506/34/354 IPG was registered against Mr. Ravinder Singh, Mr. Lakhvinder Singh,Mr.ManojKumar and Ms.Bhawna(accused persons)at
2018:DHC:8275 ,-A police station Uttam Nagar, on the complaint of Ms. Shelly Oberoi
(complainant). Accused persons and complainant were neighbours at the relevant time. A quarrel took place between them on some trivial issue which led to registration of aforesaid FIR. It is further submitted that with the intervention oftheir common friends and other family members,accused persons and complainant have settled their disputes amicably, therefore, presentFIR may be quashed.
Complainant-Ms. Shelly Oberoi is present in Court along with her counsel. She has been identified by SI Govind Singh ofpolice station Uttam
Nagar. She submits that she has settled the matter with Mr.Ravinder Singh, Mr.Lakhvinder Singh, Mr.Manoj Kumar and Ms.Bhawna ofher own free will and without any undue force,pressure or coercion. She has no objection in case presentFIR and the consequent proceedings are quashed.
Keeping in mind the settlement arrived at between Mr. Ravinder Singh,Mr.Lakhvinder Singh,Mr.Manoj Kumar and Ms.Bhawna(accused persons) and Ms. Shelly Oberoi (complainant), in my view, no fruitful purpose would be served in keeping the criminal proceedings pending.
Accordingly, aforesaid FIR and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
! . r' \ Both the petitions are disposed ofin the above terms. Miscellaneous applications are disposed ofas infructuous.
Dasti.
A.K.PATHAK,J.
SEPTEMBER 11,2018 ga
11.09.2018 It is submitted that present FIR No. 376/2014 under Sections
323/341/506/34/354 IPG was registered against Mr. Ravinder Singh, Mr. Lakhvinder Singh,Mr.ManojKumar and Ms.Bhawna(accused persons)at
2018:DHC:8275 ,-A police station Uttam Nagar, on the complaint of Ms. Shelly Oberoi
(complainant). Accused persons and complainant were neighbours at the relevant time. A quarrel took place between them on some trivial issue which led to registration of aforesaid FIR. It is further submitted that with the intervention oftheir common friends and other family members,accused persons and complainant have settled their disputes amicably, therefore, presentFIR may be quashed.
Complainant-Ms. Shelly Oberoi is present in Court along with her counsel. She has been identified by SI Govind Singh ofpolice station Uttam
Nagar. She submits that she has settled the matter with Mr.Ravinder Singh, Mr.Lakhvinder Singh, Mr.Manoj Kumar and Ms.Bhawna ofher own free will and without any undue force,pressure or coercion. She has no objection in case presentFIR and the consequent proceedings are quashed.
Keeping in mind the settlement arrived at between Mr. Ravinder Singh,Mr.Lakhvinder Singh,Mr.Manoj Kumar and Ms.Bhawna(accused persons) and Ms. Shelly Oberoi (complainant), in my view, no fruitful purpose would be served in keeping the criminal proceedings pending.
Accordingly, aforesaid FIR and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
! . r' \ Both the petitions are disposed ofin the above terms. Miscellaneous applications are disposed ofas infructuous.
Dasti.
A.K.PATHAK,J.
SEPTEMBER 11,2018 ga
JUDGMENT