Delhi High Court
59,687 judgments
Devinder Khosla v. Anil Khosla & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that an Interim Award accepted by parties and confirmed by Court order is final and binding, and claims beyond the limited scope of reference cannot be entertained by the Arbitrator.
Indrajit Kumar Singh v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking directions for further investigation into the death of the petitioner’s wife, holding that the police investigation was fair, thorough, and no grounds existed for judicial interference.
M/S SCONCE GLOBAL PVT LTD v. M/S REAL VIDEO IMPACT PVT LTD
The Delhi High Court decreed recovery of outstanding contract dues with pendent lite and future interest in favor of the plaintiff against the ex parte defendant.
Nirmal Bot Ltd. v. National Highway Authority of India
The Delhi High Court restrained the respondent from retaining disputed annuity payments during arbitration, directing deposit in escrow and allowing bank guarantees as security.
M/S NCCL-PREMCO (IV) v. NATIONAL THERMAL POWER CORPORATION LIMITED & ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that a principal, though not a signatory, is a necessary party to arbitration when an agent acts on its behalf, and appointed a sole arbitrator dissolving the arbitrator appointed by the agent.
Manoj Cablecompany v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that post-award interest at 18% per annum is payable under Section 31(7)(b) of the Arbitration Act when the Award is silent on interest, but pre-award interest must be expressly awarded by the Arbitrator.
Sonu & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act based on a mutual settlement and divorce decree, emphasizing the court's power to end futile criminal proceedings in matrimonial disputes.
Sunny Chauhan & Ors v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial discord after the parties reconciled and the complainant withdrew the charges.
Sunil Kumar & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act based on a mutual settlement in a matrimonial dispute, emphasizing the role of mediation and the complainant's consent.
Shashi Kant Sharma & Ors v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial discord following a full settlement and the complainant's decision not to prosecute further.
Sh. Amit Singla v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 341, 354-A, 509, and 506 IPC based on a compromise between the parties and the complainant's withdrawal of prosecution, subject to payment of costs.
Prehlad Singh & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR arising from a family dispute based on an amicable settlement and the complainant's withdrawal of prosecution.
Mukesh & Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial discord after the parties settled their dispute and obtained a mutual consent divorce.
Mohd. Asif v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
Delhi High Court modified bail condition in an electricity theft case, reducing pre-deposit requirement to 20% considering petitioner's inability to pay and tenancy facts.
Suninder Sandha v. M/S Concept Horizon Infra Private Limited & Ors
The Delhi High Court directed the trial court to expedite disposal of the complaint case within six months, without prejudicing parties' arbitration rights or quashing remedies.
Shri Virender Kumar & Ors v. State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial discord based on a settlement and the complainant's non-prosecution stance.
Varsha Pandey v. State of (NCT) Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to a petitioner accused of running a fake recruitment agency, holding that her limited role as an employee and absence of adverse antecedents justified bail.
State of NCT of Delhi v. Ashish Kumar
The Delhi High Court set aside the acquittal of an accused charged with attempted rape of a three-year-old child and remanded the case for recording additional evidence due to incomplete investigation and lack of corroboration.
Vinod Bhandkoliya v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that SSC must await Review Medical Board results before declaring final select lists and that merit prevails over incomplete force preferences in recruitment.
M/S DB CORP LTD. v. M/S CHD DEVELOPERS LTD.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging an arbitral award, holding that the contract's refund waiver clause did not bar the respondent's claim when the breach was by the appellant, and judicial interference under Section 37 is limited to perverse awards.