Delhi High Court
59,687 judgments
Dinesh Kumar v. Ruchi Ahuja
The Delhi High Court held that interim orders denying right to residence under the DV Act are not final and the wife is entitled to summon documents and lead evidence to prove ownership claims, dismissing the husband's petition challenging procedural directions.
Giorgio Armani S P A & Ors. v. Yogesh Mordani & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction against unauthorized sale of products bearing the ARMANI trademark, holding such use without permission as infringement under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
Prabhleen Kaur v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that mere doubts about nationality without conclusive evidence cannot justify refusal of passport to a citizen by birth and directed issuance of passport to the petitioner.
Darshna v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction of a daughter-in-law from her in-laws' property under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, ruling that eviction can be ordered without a prior maintenance claim and that the term 'legal heir' includes daughter-in-law.
Sunny Paul v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors
The Delhi High Court held that the Maintenance Tribunal has jurisdiction under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents & Senior Citizens Act, 2007 to order eviction of adult children from senior citizens' property under Section 23, independent of maintenance claims.
Rajiv Kumar Rai v. M/S Indian Agriculture Research Institute & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and refused to condone a 1572-day delay, holding that financial hardship alone does not constitute sufficient cause under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
Padam Chand Kanodia v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession and compensation are not completed within five years, allowing a subsequent purchaser to challenge such proceedings.
Chandermal and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is not paid within five years, even if possession has been taken.
Gopal Goel v. Sapna
The High Court upheld the acquittal of the respondent in a cheque dishonour case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act due to lack of credible evidence of a legally enforceable debt.
Shriamolak Singh Batra v. Government of N.C.T. of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed DSIIDC to convert industrial sheds from leasehold to freehold upon deposit of conversion charges despite a dispute with DDA over entitlement to those charges, holding that allottees' rights should not be delayed by inter-agency disputes.
Sanjay Jain v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw anticipatory bail applications pending before it to first approach the Trial Court, dismissing the petitions as withdrawn.
Director of Income Tax (Exemption) v. Delhi Public School Society
The Delhi High Court upheld the exemption under Section 11(4A) of the Income Tax Act for maintenance charges received by Delhi Public School Society from satellite schools, dismissing the Revenue's appeals.
Surendra Kumar Jain v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-III, New Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed multiple writ petitions challenging income tax authorities' actions, holding such actions illegal and beyond jurisdiction, granting relief to the petitioners.
Kanhiya Lal v. Arun Tomar
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to compound the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act following settlement and compliance with Supreme Court-mandated costs, resulting in acquittal of the petitioner.
Mohd. Rizwan & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR arising from matrimonial discord following a mediated settlement and divorce, holding that continuation of criminal proceedings would be futile and contrary to justice.
GOVIND LAL & ORS v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act following a full and final settlement and divorce by mutual consent in a matrimonial dispute.
Inderjeet Sisodia & Ors v. The State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial discord following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce.
Yogesh Kumar & Ors. v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act following a mutual settlement and divorce between the parties, holding continuation of criminal proceedings futile.
Surendra Kumar Jain v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-III, New Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed multiple connected writ petitions challenging income tax orders, holding that such orders must comply with legal and procedural fairness, referring to a detailed judgment in a connected case.
Surendra Kumar Jain v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-III, New Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed multiple connected writ petitions challenging income tax proceedings by disposing them through a common judgment referencing detailed reasoning in a related case.