Delhi High Court
59,687 judgments
Bhawana Goel v. The State
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 420 IPC based on a full settlement between parties and the complainant's decision not to pursue prosecution.
IFFCO Tokio General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Tarsem Kaur & Ors.
The Delhi High Court modified the liability in a motor accident case involving a stationary truck and a moving car, holding both drivers equally negligent and apportioning compensation liability equally between their insurers.
IFFCO Tokio General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Tarsem Kaur & Ors.
The Delhi High Court modified the liability in a motor accident claim involving a stationary truck and a moving car, directing equal 50:50 apportionment of compensation between their insurers based on contributory negligence.
The New India Assurance Company Limited v. Munesh Devi
The Delhi High Court partially allowed the insurer's appeal to reduce compensation in a motor accident claim by applying the Supreme Court's Pranay Sethi guidelines on future prospects and non-pecuniary heads.
The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v. Arjun Dass & Ors; Shanti Devi & Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurer's appeals seeking recovery rights against the driver and owner of the insured truck, holding that insufficient evidence was produced to prove the driver's license was invalid on the accident date.
The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v. Arjun Dass & Ors; Shanti Devi & Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurer's appeals seeking recovery rights against the driver and owner of the insured vehicle due to inconclusive evidence on the invalidity of the driver's license.
Rajeev Sharma v. Shri Raj Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition upholding the Financial Commissioner’s order restoring an ex parte Revenue Assistant’s order, emphasizing that unexplained delay of over 24 years in filing appeal cannot be condoned and correction of Khasra/Girdawari does not confer title.
Anil v. Sahab Singh & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to compound the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act following settlement and compliance with Supreme Court directions, resulting in the petitioner's acquittal.
IMAGES CONSUMER MEDIA PVT. LTD. v. SPA LUXUARY LIFESTYLE LTD
The Delhi High Court admitted a winding up petition against a company for unpaid advertisement dues, rejecting the limitation defence and appointing a Provisional Liquidator with a conditional suspension to allow payment.
Shobhana Bhartia & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings against a newspaper company for non-compliance under the Working Journalists Act, holding that jurisdiction lay with Uttar Pradesh authorities after the establishment shifted there, and continuation by Delhi authorities was an abuse of process.
Shobhana Bhartia & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under the Working Journalists Act against petitioners after their newspaper establishment shifted to Uttar Pradesh, holding that jurisdiction lies with the State where the establishment operates and continuation in Delhi was an abuse of process.
Sandeep Sinha & Anr. v. State of NCT, Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under non-compoundable dowry offences arising from matrimonial disputes based on a genuine settlement, emphasizing the court's inherent power to prevent abuse of process and promote amicable resolutions.
Vaidehi Thakar v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under the Working Journalists Act against a newspaper establishment that had shifted to Uttar Pradesh, holding that Delhi lacked jurisdiction and the complaint was an abuse of process.
Birender Kumar Sharma v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354-D and 509 IPC based on a settlement between the parties and the complainant's decision not to prosecute further.
Ajit Singh & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the seniority placement of a BSF officer already judicially settled, holding that the petitioners must seek remedy against the prior judgment rather than re-litigate seniority.
Vinod Kumar & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed two FIRs alleging forgery and cheating related to property disputes following an amicable settlement between the parties and non-prosecution by the complainants.
Vinod Kumar & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed two FIRs alleging forgery and criminal conspiracy over property disputes following an amicable settlement between the parties.
Ejaz Ahmed Aslam v. Mohammad Azim Ahmed
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Regular Second Appeal, affirming that a counter-claim decree requires a separate appeal and that the respondent validly proved ownership of the property by gift under Mohammedan Law.
Mukhtar Ali v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the issuance of proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. against an accused who repeatedly avoided trial court appearance despite liberty granted to appear.
Neeraj Safi v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of a domestic servant for rape and murder based on circumstantial evidence, disclosure statements, and forensic reports, dismissing his appeal.