Delhi High Court

59,687 judgments

Year:

Surendra Kumar Jain v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-III, New Delhi & Anr.

01 Oct 2018 · S. Ravindra Bhat; A.K. Chawla · 2018:DHC:6386-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed multiple writ petitions challenging income tax authorities' orders for lack of jurisdiction and procedural fairness, referring to a detailed connected judgment for reasoning.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Writ Petition Jurisdiction Natural Justice

Surendra Kumar Jain v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-III, New Delhi & Anr.

01 Oct 2018 · S. Ravindra Bhat; A.K. Chawla · 2018:DHC:6383-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed multiple writ petitions quashing impugned income tax orders for lack of jurisdiction and violation of procedural safeguards, directing reliance on the detailed judgment in W.P.(C) 4304/2018.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Article 226 Constitution of India Writ Petition Tax Proceedings

Surendra Kumar Jain v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-III, New Delhi & Anr.

01 Oct 2018 · S. Ravindra Bhat; A.K. Chawla · 2018:DHC:6394-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed multiple writ petitions challenging income tax proceedings, emphasizing strict adherence to procedural fairness and statutory compliance by tax authorities.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Writ Petition Article 226 Procedural fairness

Surendra Kumar Jain v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-III, New Delhi & Anr.

01 Oct 2018 · S. Ravindra Bhat; A.K. Chawla · 2018:DHC:6384-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed multiple writ petitions setting aside impugned income tax orders for non-compliance with procedural safeguards and violation of natural justice.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 writ petition natural justice procedural safeguards

Surendra Kumar Jain v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-III, New Delhi & Anr.

01 Oct 2018 · S. Ravindra Bhat; A.K. Chawla · 2018:DHC:6385-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed multiple writ petitions quashing impugned income tax orders for violation of natural justice and directed reconsideration in accordance with law.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 writ petition natural justice income tax proceedings

Surendra Kumar Jain v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-III, New Delhi & Anr.

01 Oct 2018 · S. Ravindra Bhat; A.K. Chawla · 2018:DHC:6387-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed multiple connected writ petitions challenging income tax proceedings by a common order referring to a detailed judgment in a related case.

tax appeal_allowed writ petition income tax Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi High Court

Surendra Kumar Jain v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-III, New Delhi & Anr.

01 Oct 2018 · S. Ravindra Bhat; A.K. Chawla · 2018:DHC:6388-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed multiple writ petitions setting aside impugned income tax orders due to procedural lapses and violation of natural justice, emphasizing fair exercise of statutory powers by tax authorities.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Writ Petition Natural Justice Procedural Fairness

Surendra Kumar Jain v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-III, New Delhi & Anr.

01 Oct 2018 · S. Ravindra Bhat; A.K. Chawla · 2018:DHC:6389-DB

Delhi High Court allowed multiple writ petitions setting aside income tax orders passed without adherence to natural justice and procedural fairness.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 writ petition natural justice income tax assessment

Surendra Kumar Jain v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-III, New Delhi & Anr.

01 Oct 2018 · S. Ravindra Bhat; A.K. Chawla · 2018:DHC:6390-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed multiple writ petitions quashing impugned income tax orders for lack of jurisdiction and violation of natural justice principles.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Writ Petition Article 226 Jurisdiction

Surendra Kumar Jain v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-III, New Delhi & Anr.

01 Oct 2018 · S. Ravindra Bhat; A.K. Chawla · 2018:DHC:6391-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed multiple writ petitions challenging the Income Tax Department's orders, holding them legally unsustainable due to jurisdictional and procedural defects.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Department Writ Petition Jurisdiction Natural Justice

M/S. VINI COSMETICS PVT. LTD. v. M/S. ABHAY ENTERPRISES & ORS.

01 Oct 2018 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2018:DHC:6350

The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages against a defendant importing counterfeit cosmetics bearing the plaintiff's trademark, affirming liability despite claims of third-party misuse of import codes.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement passing off permanent injunction damages

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited v. Ganga Saran

01 Oct 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:6352
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for permanent disability in a motor accident claim and denied insurer’s recovery rights due to lack of direct evidence of invalid driving license.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim compensation enhancement driving license validity recovery rights

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited v. Ganga Saran

01 Oct 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:6351
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for permanent disability in a motor accident claim and held that invalidity of a driving license must be proved by direct evidence to grant recovery rights to the insurer.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim compensation loss of earning capacity permanent disability

Purshotam Behl v. Union of India and Anr.

01 Oct 2018 · S. Ravindra Bhat; A. K. Chawla · 2018:DHC:6346-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Purshotam Behl against the Union of India and NHAI, referring to a connected detailed judgment.

administrative petition_dismissed writ petition Union of India NHAI dismissal

Ferrari Estates LLP v. Union of India

01 Oct 2018 · S. Ravindra Bhat; A. K. Chawla · 2018:DHC:6347-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of the land acquisition notification for the Dwarka Expressway, ruling that objections were duly considered and that judicial interference in executive infrastructure planning is limited.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant National Highways Act, 1956 land acquisition Section 3(A)(1) Section 3(C)(1)

M/S VASANT VIHAR CLUB v. SUKHBIR SINGH

01 Oct 2018 · C. Hari Shankar · 2018:DHC:6348

The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court's award directing payment of Assistant Electrician salary to the respondent based on an unwithdrawn transfer letter, dismissing the employer's writ petition.

labor petition_dismissed Labour Court Award Assistant Electrician transfer letter employment dispute

Sh. Paras Kapil & Ors. v. State & Anr.

01 Oct 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:6369

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act following a full settlement and mutual divorce between the parties, holding that continuation of proceedings would be futile.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC Dowry Prohibition Act matrimonial dispute

J L Varshney & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

01 Oct 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:6368

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial discord following a full settlement between parties and dissolution of marriage by a foreign court.

criminal appeal_allowed quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC matrimonial dispute mediation settlement

Harish Kumar & Ors. v. State (N.C.T of Delhi) & Anr.

01 Oct 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:6360

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial discord following a full and final settlement and mutual divorce between the parties.

criminal petition_allowed Section 498A IPC Section 406 IPC Section 34 IPC matrimonial dispute

Sanwal Ram Meena & Ors. v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr

01 Oct 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:6361

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial discord following a full settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuation of criminal proceedings would be futile.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC matrimonial dispute mediation