Delhi High Court
47,108 judgments
S. C. Sharma & Ors. v. CBI
The Delhi High Court acquitted officials charged with corruption and forgery in civil works due to failure of prosecution to prove non-execution of work and absence of crucial documentary evidence.
S. C. Sharma & Ors. v. CBI
The Delhi High Court acquitted appellants charged with corruption and forgery in public works due to failure of prosecution to prove non-execution of work and non-production of crucial measurement books.
S. C. Sharma & Ors. v. CBI
The Delhi High Court acquitted appellants charged with corruption and criminal conspiracy in public works due to failure of prosecution to produce essential evidence and prove charges beyond reasonable doubt.
Shobha Dube v. State and Anr.
The High Court held that mediation in criminal offences under Section 420 IPC cannot proceed without the consent of the aggrieved party, clarifying that legal heirs of witnesses cannot unilaterally prevent mediation but the aggrieved party's consent is mandatory.
Babita & Anr. v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, applying inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.
Shalini Arora v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court set aside the discharge of the husband under Section 498A IPC, holding that a prima facie case of cruelty was made out and directing trial to proceed, while upholding discharge of other respondents.
S.R. Katoch v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under multiple IPC sections on the ground of amicable settlement and predominant civil nature of the dispute, exercising its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Nihal Chand & Ors. v. CBI
The Delhi High Court acquitted public officials and a contractor accused of criminal conspiracy and corruption in bogus repair bills, holding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt.
Sh. Ankur Gupta v. State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 406, 498-A, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute on the ground of an amicable settlement between the parties, applying the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.
Parsvnath Developers Limited v. Kiran Industries & Investment Company
The Delhi High Court held that concealment of an injunction and loss of title documents by defendants constituted fraud, entitling the plaintiff to recover payments made under a development MoU with interest, while dismissing claims for damages and expenses for lack of evidence.
Shabnam Sikand v. Geeta Sikand & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's suit for partition and declaration nullifying a Relinquishment Deed, holding that the deed was valid and the plaintiff had no legal share in the property under the Hindu Succession Act.
Pintu Kumar Pandit & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 288, 304A, and 201 IPC on the basis of the complainant's affidavit stating the incident was accidental and settled, exercising its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.
Mohd. Rafiq & Anr v. State of N.C.T of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 324/34 IPC on the ground of settlement between parties, applying the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent futile criminal proceedings.
Mohd. Arif & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement, applying the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Shri Arun Tejwani & Ors v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.
M v. A
The High Court held that a divorce petition cannot be withdrawn to file a fresh petition setting up a new case under the guise of curing formal defects, and directed the Family Court to proceed with the original petition.
Bennett, Coleman & Co. Ltd. v. Nanda Ravi
The Delhi High Court upheld the plaintiffs' exclusive rights in the registered trademark "E-TIMES" and granted permanent injunction restraining defendants from using the infringing domain name www.etimes.in.
Vinod Kumardahiya v. Neptuneship Management Services (PTE) Ltd.
The Delhi High Court granted a four-month extension for concluding arbitration proceedings upon joint request of the parties, considering the advanced stage and resources invested.
AIR FORCE NAVAL HOUSING BOARD v. OMAXBINFRASTRUCTURE& CONSTRUCTIONS LTD.
The Delhi High Court granted a six-month extension for concluding arbitration proceedings and pronouncement of the award upon mutual consent of the parties.
Manmohan Sahu and Ors. v. Directorate General of Training
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging the discontinuation of online examinations as withdrawn after the respondent redressed the petitioners' grievances by scrapping the online exam system.