Delhi High Court
47,108 judgments
EISAI CO. LTD. & ANR. v. SATISH REDDY & ANR.
The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction to the patentee against defendants manufacturing Lorcaserin Hydrochloride Hemihydrate, holding that the basic patent covers the salt form and non-working does not bar relief.
Relaxo Footwears Limited v. Aqualite India Ltd. & Anr.
The Delhi High Court vacated the interim injunction against defendants for alleged design infringement, holding the plaintiff's registered design lacked novelty and appeared common to trade.
Rajan Bery v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted letters of administration with the Will annexed to the petitioner after validating the duly executed Will and noting withdrawal of objections by other heirs.
Krishan Kumar Kashyap v. The Statesman Ltd
The Delhi High Court enhanced the compensation awarded for illegal termination from Rs. 2,00,000 to Rs. 5,00,000, holding that the original amount was inadequate while rejecting speculative claims unsupported by evidence.
Laxmi Devi v. Chairman Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing DDA to allot a flat to the petitioner, holding that delay and laches cannot defeat a claim where DDA failed to communicate allotment and lost records.
Kartik Chopra v. Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking relaxation of university attendance rules on medical grounds, holding that courts cannot override statutory attendance requirements beyond prescribed limits.
Satyam Kumar Sah & Ors. v. Narcotic Control Bureau
The Delhi High Court held that no prior application is required under Section 65 Indian Evidence Act to lead secondary evidence and that admissibility depends on satisfying statutory conditions, dismissing the petition challenging the Trial Court's order permitting secondary evidence.
Regulus Infrastructure Management v. Super Property Maintenance Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court admitted a winding up petition against a company for unpaid dues where the respondent failed to dispute the debt or respond to statutory notice, appointing a provisional liquidator subject to conditional payment.
State v. Ajay
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of an accused in a child sexual abuse case due to material discrepancies in the victim's testimony and lack of corroborative evidence, emphasizing the benefit of doubt in favor of the accused.
Pravesh Dixit @ Tinda v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for penetrative sexual assault on a minor under the POCSO Act, affirming that consent is irrelevant and minor contradictions do not vitiate the prosecution case.
Amar Kumar Pandey v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the conviction of Amar Kumar Pandey for rape and attempt to murder, relying on prosecutrix testimony, medical evidence, and recovery of weapon at accused's instance.
Raj Kumar @ Raju v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld conviction under Section 324 IPC for assault with a razor but modified the sentence to the period already served, considering the injuries were simple and the incident arose from matrimonial discord.
Shahjad Khan @ Mantu v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a robbery and assault case, citing inconsistencies in the complainant's statements and lack of clear identification in CCTV footage.
Reliance Home Finance Limited v. Jagwati Jain and Others
The Delhi High Court decreed a financing company's suit for recovery of loan amount against defendants who violated a status quo order by selling property and misappropriating funds, passing judgment for non-filing of written statements.
Lifestyle Equities C.V. & Ors. v. Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club Ltd. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction restraining defendants from using a deceptively similar polo player logo mark on fragrance products, affirming protection of essential features of a composite registered trademark under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
Dr. S.P. Gupta v. Kirori Mal College
The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral award on the ground that the Appeal Committee was unilaterally constituted without the petitioner's written consent, violating Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Pradeep Kumar & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed quashing of an FIR under Sections 341, 354-A, 504, 506, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and compensation paid, applying inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.
Surender Kumar Gupta; Ram Kishan; Ram Swaroop Singh v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellants' applications for suspension of sentence in a criminal conspiracy and criminal breach of trust case, holding that the serious nature of offences and facts did not warrant suspension pending appeal.
Surender Kumar Gupta; Ram Kishan; Ram Swaroop Singh v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellants' applications seeking suspension of their substantive sentences for offences under Sections 120B and 409 IPC, holding that the gravity of the offences and evidence did not warrant suspension.
Surender Kumar Gupta; Ram Kishan; Ram Swaroop Singh v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellants' applications for suspension of sentence in a criminal conspiracy and breach of trust case involving embezzlement, holding that the gravity of offences did not warrant suspension pending appeal.