Delhi High Court
47,915 judgments
Pradeep Kumar & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed quashing of an FIR under Sections 341, 354-A, 504, 506, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and compensation paid, applying inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.
Surender Kumar Gupta; Ram Kishan; Ram Swaroop Singh v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellants' applications for suspension of sentence in a criminal conspiracy and criminal breach of trust case, holding that the serious nature of offences and facts did not warrant suspension pending appeal.
Surender Kumar Gupta; Ram Kishan; Ram Swaroop Singh v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellants' applications seeking suspension of their substantive sentences for offences under Sections 120B and 409 IPC, holding that the gravity of the offences and evidence did not warrant suspension.
Surender Kumar Gupta; Ram Kishan; Ram Swaroop Singh v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellants' applications for suspension of sentence in a criminal conspiracy and breach of trust case involving embezzlement, holding that the gravity of offences did not warrant suspension pending appeal.
Dheeraj Gera & Anr. v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 288, 304-A, and 34 IPC on the ground of accidental incident and compensation to complainants, exercising inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.
Dhara Singh @ Nakul & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute on the basis of an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Navneet Kumar Gupta & Ors. v. State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.
Saddam Ansari v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 363 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement between parties, applying the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Rakesh Kumar Verma v. Jawaharlal Nehru University & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the lawful repatriation of a Finance Officer on deputation to JNU at the end of his deputation term coinciding with his superannuation, rejecting claims of substantive appointment and procedural violations.
Syniverse Technologies (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Telecom Regulatory Authority of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petitions challenging its earlier judgment setting aside TRAI's amendment fixing ₹4.00 PPT Charges, holding no suppression of facts and no authority for retrospective regulations.
Flipkart Internet Private Limited v. Flipkartwinnerdraw.com & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunctions and directed blocking of infringing websites against defendants using the well-known 'Flipkart' trademark without authorization, upholding the plaintiff's trademark rights.
D K v. S
The Delhi High Court dismissed the husband's appeal against the Family Court's refusal to grant divorce on grounds of cruelty and desertion, holding that the appellant failed to prove sustained cruelty or desertion by the respondent.
N V v. A V
The Delhi High Court allowed the wife's appeal and granted divorce on the ground of cruelty supported by unrebutted testimony and irretrievable breakdown of marriage, setting aside the Family Court's dismissal.
Namita Singh v. University of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that a provisional appointment subject to verification is not valid if the candidate lacks requisite qualifications, and no salary or benefits are due without formal appointment.
SUPREME COURT BAR COOPERATIVE v. REGISTRAR COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES & ANR
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 139 of the Delhi Co-operative Societies Act, a member has a broad right to seek information relating to any transaction of the society, and the society cannot deny such information.
Ashok Kumar Garg v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that departmental proceedings are deemed instituted on the date the charge memorandum is issued with Presidential sanction, not on the date of dispatch, and dismissed the petition challenging the limitation period under Rule 9 of the CCS (Pension) Rules.
Vijay Kumar Singh v. State
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner accused of cheating and forgery offences, while directing maintenance of partial attachment of his bank account pending trial.
Dinesh Gautam v. State
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner accused of sexual offences, considering delay in complaint and completion of investigation, subject to conditions.
Kanhaie Jha @ Kishan v. State
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a robbery case, emphasizing the totality of circumstances and failure of eyewitnesses to identify him despite earlier cancellation of interim bail.