Delhi High Court
49,110 judgments
Ravi Gupta & Anr. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and criminal proceedings arising from a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement and the complainant's decision not to prosecute further.
AMAN MAMTAHNI & ORS. v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and criminal proceedings in a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement and the complainant's decision not to prosecute further.
Indian Human Rights Front v. East Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL seeking demolition of unauthorized roadside constructions after finding that the municipal corporation had already removed the encroachments.
Mahtab and Ors. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Wakf Board to complete statutory proceedings to remove encroachments on a Muslim graveyard, dismissing the PIL as the removal process was underway under the Wakf Act, 1995.
Social Jurist v. Government of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL seeking enforcement of the 7th Pay Commission recommendations for unaided private school employees, holding that individual employees must approach the court themselves and noting the schools' rights under the Delhi School Education Act regarding fee regulation.
Gurinder Singh v. Jasjit Kaur
Eviction petition based solely on the bona fide need of a deceased person does not survive, and non-occupation under Section 19 of the Delhi Rent Control Act entitles the tenant to retain possession.
M/S METRO BUILDERS (ORISSA) PVT LTD v. INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award due to delay beyond the statutory limitation period under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that delay beyond 120 days cannot be condoned.
Rajat Chauhan & Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and criminal proceedings under multiple IPC sections following an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's consent.
Gurdeep Singh & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and related proceedings under Sections 323, 452, 506, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
SMT. MAMTA & ORS v. STATE & ANR.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and criminal proceedings under IPC sections 323, 341, 356, 379, and 34 following an amicable settlement between the parties under Section 482 CrPC.
Anand Yadav and Pradyumn Rao v. Mera Baba Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court allowed defendants to amend their written statements to plead loss suffered in recovery suits, emphasizing that amendments should not be denied merely due to framing of issues or commencement of evidence.
INTERNETFUND IIIPTE LTD v. AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS (INCOME-TAX) & ANR
The Delhi High Court directed the Authority for Advance Rulings to dispose of the petitioner's pending application within two months, enforcing the statutory six-month disposal period under Section 245R(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Jaiprakash Kataria & Anr v. M/S Indian Overseas Co. Pvt. Ltd
The Delhi High Court granted leave to withdraw the petitions and dismissed them along with pending applications as withdrawn.
M/S SHREE ENTERPRISES v. ZACHARIAN MATHEW ABRAHAM
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw criminal petitions with liberty to raise defenses before the Trial Court and dismissed pending applications.
Federation of Pharma Entrepreneurs v. Employees State Insurance Corporation
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging tender conditions as infructuous after tender awards but granted liberty to challenge similar future tenders.
Renuka Sarkar and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Union of India to promote petitioners to ranks held by their juniors with consequential benefits, following binding Supreme Court and High Court precedents.
Krishnarao Sanapala v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions by army personnel seeking deployment on a UN Mission, holding that deployment decisions based on vacancy availability are discretionary and not subject to judicial interference under principles of legitimate expectation or promissory estoppel.
Mukesh v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions by alleged squatters seeking protection from eviction, holding that only declared vending areas under the Street Vendors Act qualify for such protection and that renting commercial premises negates squatter status.
Sunita Rohela & Anr. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed senior citizen petitioners to travel abroad during a criminal trial under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, setting aside travel restrictions subject to furnishing security and travel details.
Sanjog Steels Pvt Ltd v. Anil Rathi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against an ex parte interim order in a commercial suit, directing the appellant to seek relief before the trial court as the suit and contempt proceedings were ongoing.