Delhi High Court

49,110 judgments

Year:

Subhash Chand @ Subhash Chandra v. Reliance Gen Ins Co Ltd & Ors.

19 Nov 2019 · Najmi Waziri · 2019:DHC:6121

Delhi High Court allowed the appeal to enhance compensation in a motor accident claim by applying minimum wages for an unskilled worker and awarding additional damages as per Supreme Court precedents.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim compensation minimum wages unskilled workman

State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) v. Akram

19 Nov 2019 · Manmohan; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2019:DHC:6116-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a minor sexual assault case, emphasizing the prosecution’s failure to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt despite statutory presumptions under the POCSO Act.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant sexual assault minor prosecutrix POCSO Act eyewitness testimony

Rita Vashishtha v. Anil Kumar Vashishtha

19 Nov 2019 · G. S. Sistani; Jyoti Singh · 2019:DHC:6095-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld a Family Court decree granting divorce on grounds of mental cruelty supported by cumulative evidence and admissions, while recognizing irretrievable breakdown as a relevant circumstance alongside cruelty.

family appeal_dismissed Significant mental cruelty divorce Hindu Marriage Act Section 13(1)(ia)

M/S Vashisht Infratech Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v. State & Anr.

19 Nov 2019 · Brijesh Sethi · 2019:DHC:6120

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR involving forgery and cheating in a bank loan case, holding that serious economic offences affecting public interest cannot be quashed merely on the basis of settlement.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR forgery Section 467 IPC

Biresh v. The Lieutenant Governor of Delhi and Ors.

19 Nov 2019 · D. N. Patel; C. Hari Shankar · 2019:DHC:6115-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL challenging illegal constructions on land due to pending revenue proceedings and the petitioner's failure to approach the court with clean hands.

administrative petition_dismissed Public Interest Litigation illegal construction land encroachment maintainability

Ved Prakash Aggarwal v. Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Union of India

19 Nov 2019 · Jayant Nath · 2019:DHC:6133

The Delhi High Court held that the RTI Act does not override the NGT's procedural rules for obtaining certified copies of orders and dismissed the petition challenging the CIC's order.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Right to Information Act, 2005 NGT (Practice and Procedure) Rules, 2011 judicial records certified copies

Shahzad Ali v. The State of Delhi

19 Nov 2019 · Brijesh Sethi · 2019:DHC:6130

The Delhi High Court dismissed the anticipatory bail application of Shahzad Ali in a serious assault case due to credible evidence of involvement, non-cooperation, and prior criminal record despite his age and health.

criminal appeal_dismissed anticipatory bail Section 438 Cr.P.C. serious offences non-cooperation

Dr. Reetesh Arora & Anr v. Medical Council of India Through Secretary & Ors

19 Nov 2019 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2019:DHC:6132

The Delhi High Court allowed a medical student subjected to ragging to migrate to another university with relaxed academic conditions to protect his educational interests.

administrative petition_allowed ragging medical education migration relaxation of rules

Vinod v. Union of India

19 Nov 2019 · S. Muralidhar; Talwant Singh · 2019:DHC:6089-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner's appeal directing retrospective regularisation as a Mobile Booking Clerk under the Railway Board's scheme, setting aside CAT orders denying such relief.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Mobile Booking Clerk Regularisation Railway Board Circular Retrospective regularisation

Commissioner, Central Excise, Customs & Service Tax, Sonepat v. Amit Decorative Plywoods Pvt. Ltd.

19 Nov 2019 · THE CHIEF JUSTICE; C. Hari Shankar · 2019:DHC:6090-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that the Settlement Commission cannot act as an adjudicating authority and set aside its order settling a central excise duty evasion case due to lack of full and true disclosure and improper rejection of evidence.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Settlement Commission Central Excise Act, 1944 clandestine removal duty evasion

Honeycom Synergies v. Commissioner of Customs (Export) & Ors.

19 Nov 2019 · Chief Justice; C. Hari Shankar · 2019:DHC:6091-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Customs Settlement Commission's imposition of penalty for willful undervaluation of imports and held that rectification applications require hearing and reasoned orders but dismissed the petition challenging the penalty.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Customs Act, 1962 Settlement Commission Penalty Misdeclaration

Commissioner of Income Tax v. Bhagwan Shree Laxmi Narain

19 Nov 2019 · Vipin Sanghi; Sanjeev Narula · 2019:DHC:6131-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's decision allowing exemption under Section 11 to a religious trust engaged in spiritual activities, rejecting revenue's disallowances for alleged personal benefit and anonymous donations without material evidence.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 11 exemption Section 13(1)(c) religious activities

Sanjeev Kumar v. State & Anr.

19 Nov 2019 · Brijesh Sethi · 2019:DHC:6125

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354, 451, and 323 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute on the ground of amicable settlement between the parties.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute Section 482 CrPC amicable settlement

Radhey Shyam Singhal v. The State & Anr.

19 Nov 2019 · Brijesh Sethi · 2019:DHC:6126

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 420 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 420 IPC amicable settlement Compromise Deed

Gaurav Gupta & Ors. v. State & Anr.

19 Nov 2019 · Brijesh Sethi · 2019:DHC:6127

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute after the parties amicably settled through mediation and the complainant withdrew her grievance.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 498-A IPC matrimonial dispute mediation

Laxmi Narayan Sharma v. State of NCT of Delhi

19 Nov 2019 · Brijesh Sethi · 2019:DHC:6129

The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of the accused in a large cash theft case, holding that the serious nature of the offence and limited recovery of stolen property precluded bail at this stage.

criminal appeal_dismissed bail Section 439 CrPC theft Section 379 IPC

Dr Shashi Bhushan Sonhadra v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

19 Nov 2019 · D.N. Patel; C. Hari Shankar · 2019:DHC:6128-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the government to expedite filling teacher vacancies and improve infrastructure in government schools, while declining to continue judicial monitoring of the matter.

administrative petition_dismissed Public Interest Litigation Government schools Teacher vacancies Infrastructural facilities

Rakesh Mishra v. M/S Hukson Trading Corporation

19 Nov 2019 · Rekha Palli · 2019:DHC:6119

The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court's finding that the petitioner voluntarily left employment after settling dues, dismissing the claim of illegal termination.

labor petition_dismissed illegal termination voluntary resignation full and final settlement industrial dispute

DELHI SOCIETY FOR PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMAL v. JOINT LABOUR COMMISSIONER & ORS.

19 Nov 2019 · Rekha Palli · 2019:DHC:6108
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that summary recovery proceedings under Section 33C(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act are maintainable when the amount due under a final award can be determined by simple calculation, dismissing the petitioner’s challenge to the recovery certificate.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33C(1) Section 33C(2) Labour Commissioner

Harjeet Singh Bedi v. M/S Asset Reconstruction Company India Limited

19 Nov 2019 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2019:DHC:6109

The Delhi High Court permitted the petitioner to pay a higher amount for a property under auction and directed the Recovery Officer to consider the payment proposal before confirming the sale.

civil petition_allowed e-auction property sale Recovery Officer DRT