Delhi High Court

49,110 judgments

Year:

Ram Avtar Bairwa v. Sunita Devi @ Santra

20 Nov 2019 · G. S. Sistani; Jyoti Singh · 2019:DHC:6145-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the husband's appeal and granted divorce on the ground of mental cruelty caused by the wife's false complaints and prolonged legal harassment under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act.

family appeal_allowed Significant mental cruelty false complaints Section 13(1)(ia) Hindu Marriage Act Section 498A IPC

Ranjeet Kaur v. Saranjeet

20 Nov 2019 · G. S. Sistani; Jyoti Singh · 2019:DHC:6144-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's decree of divorce on grounds of mental cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, dismissing the wife's appeal challenging the finding of cruelty and dissolution of marriage.

family appeal_dismissed Significant mental cruelty Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 13(1)(ia) divorce

M/S RAJWANT SINGH ENGINEERS AND CONTRACTORS v. DELHI STATE INDUSTRIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

20 Nov 2019 · Jyoti Singh · 2019:DHC:6143

The Delhi High Court granted a consensual extension of time for passing the arbitral award under Section 29A(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil other Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 29A(5) extension of time arbitral award

Jugminder Lal & Ors. v. Jasjit Kaur

20 Nov 2019 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2019:DHC:6169

The Delhi High Court held that eviction based on bona fide necessity must subsist at the time of adjudication, and subsequent death of the person for whose occupation eviction was sought nullifies the eviction petition.

property appeal_allowed Significant eviction petition bona fide necessity Delhi Rent Control Act Section 14(1)(e)

M/S ANIL SHARMA & SONS v. M/S NATIONAL SMALL INDUSTRIES CORPORATION LTD & ORS

20 Nov 2019 · G.S. Sistani; Anup Jairam Bhambhani · 2019:DHC:6180-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the dismissal of defendant No.4's application challenging the binding effect of a settlement and remanded the matter for fresh hearing on issues including the absence of a foreclosure prayer under Order 34 CPC.

civil appeal_allowed compromise decree binding effect Order 34 CPC foreclosure of mortgage

R.S. Rana v. Delhi Development Authority

20 Nov 2019 · G.S. Sistani; Anup Jairam Bhambhani · 2019:DHC:6181-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the framing of disciplinary charges for answer sheet tampering, holding that such challenges are premature before conclusion of departmental enquiry.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disciplinary proceedings charge-sheet judicial review forensic examination

Director General Works CPWD v. Kashinath & Ors.

20 Nov 2019 · Rekha Palli · 2019:DHC:6142

The Delhi High Court modified a labour tribunal award to regularise employees as 'Khalasi' from their initial joining date with full benefits, rejecting regularisation as 'Senior Mechanic' but ensuring back benefits from the start of service.

labor appeal_allowed Significant regularisation senior mechanic khalasi back wages

Rambhool Singh v. Manjeet Singh

20 Nov 2019 · Yogesh Khanna · 2019:DHC:6151

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the decree for recovery of Rs.4.50 lakh based on promissory note and dishonored cheques, rejecting the appellant's defense as implausible.

civil appeal_dismissed Order XXXVII CPC promissory note dishonored cheque Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act

Asha Srivastava v. Arun Srivastava & Ors.

20 Nov 2019 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2019:DHC:6146

The Delhi High Court permitted defendants to lead rebuttal evidence on the validity of a Will due to improper issue framing and clarified procedural rules under Order XVIII Rule 3 CPC, while granting the plaintiff an opportunity to cross-examine rebuttal witnesses.

civil other Significant Order XVIII Rule 3 CPC rebuttal evidence valid execution of Will onus of proof

The Indian Newspaper Society & Anr. v. The Chairman, Press Council of India & Ors.

20 Nov 2019 · D. N. Patel; C. Hari Shankar · 2019:DHC:6149-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a Letters Patent Appeal challenging an adjournment order in a writ petition, holding such orders are not appealable as they do not decide substantive rights.

civil appeal_dismissed Letters Patent Appeal adjournment order maintainability of appeal writ petition

The Indian Newspaper Society & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.

20 Nov 2019 · D. N. Patel; C. Hari Shankar · 2019:DHC:6150-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a Letters Patent Appeal challenging an adjournment order in a writ petition, holding such interlocutory orders are not appealable.

civil appeal_dismissed Letters Patent Appeal adjournment order maintainability interlocutory order

Hopeson Ningshen v. CBI

20 Nov 2019 · G. S. Sistani; Chander Shekhar · 2019:DHC:6155-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of Hopeson Ningshen for abduction and murder, affirming the voluntariness and admissibility of his confession under Section 164 CrPC supported by corroborative evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 164 CrPC confession voluntariness abduction for ransom Section 364A IPC

Ashok Kumar Gupta v. Zeal Developer Pvt. Ltd

20 Nov 2019 · Jyoti Singh, J. · 2019:DHC:6147

The Delhi High Court granted a six-month extension for completion of arbitral proceedings under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, regularising the intervening period and directing no unnecessary adjournments.

civil petition_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 29A extension of time arbitral proceedings

Dr. Ashok Kumar Khaturia v. Zeal Developers Pvt Ltd

20 Nov 2019 · Jyoti Singh · 2019:DHC:6148

The Delhi High Court granted a six-month extension for completion of arbitral proceedings under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, on parties' consent and subject to no unnecessary adjournments.

civil petition_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 29A extension of time arbitral proceedings

Harender Nehra v. Shri Ram General Insurance Company Ltd

20 Nov 2019 · Najmi Waziri · 2019:DHC:6178

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that medical expenses already reimbursed to the claimant cannot be compensated twice in a motor accident claim.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant medical expenses reimbursement motor accident claims compensation

Central Cottage Industries Corporation of India Ltd. v. Radhey Shyam

20 Nov 2019 · Rekha Palli · 2019:DHC:6140

The Delhi High Court set aside an ex parte Labour Court award due to lack of proper service of notice and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, while directing payment of back wages under Section 17B of the Industrial Disputes Act.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 17B ex parte award service of notice

EXIM INTERNATIONAL v. TRANSTECHNOSOFT PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS.

20 Nov 2019 · Jyoti Singh, J. · 2019:DHC:6159

The Delhi High Court condoned delay, proceeded ex-parte against non-appearing respondents, and appointed a sole arbitrator under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate the dispute.

arbitration appeal_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 condonation of delay ex-parte proceedings appointment of arbitrator

Suristh Tiwary v. Amarpali Homes Projects Ltd.

20 Nov 2019 · Jyoti Singh · 2019:DHC:6158

Delhi High Court allowed arbitration petition, appointed sole arbitrator, and deleted non-relieved party, affirming jurisdiction based on arbitration seat clause.

civil petition_allowed Arbitration Clause Seat of Arbitration Jurisdiction Appointment of Arbitrator

Salek Ram v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

20 Nov 2019 · G. S. Sistani; Chander Shekhar · 2019:DHC:6157-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of accused in a dowry death case, holding that the prosecution failed to prove cruelty or harassment 'soon before death' as required under Section 304-B IPC.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 304-B IPC dowry death cruelty soon before death hostile witnesses

State v. Sushil and Ors.

20 Nov 2019 · G. S. Sistani; Chander Shekhar · 2019:DHC:6156-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's appeal against acquittal, holding that inconsistencies in eyewitness accounts, unexplained delays, and unreliable recovery raised reasonable doubt, justifying the Trial Court's decision.

criminal appeal_dismissed eyewitness testimony motive delay in recording statement recovery of weapon