Delhi High Court
29,725 judgments
Harjeet Singh Puri v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging disciplinary proceedings for lack of territorial jurisdiction, holding that a minuscule part of cause of action arising in Delhi does not confer jurisdiction when the principal cause of action lies outside.
Ruchika Industries v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order for failure to afford the petitioner an opportunity to be heard, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of extension notifications open pending Supreme Court decision.
Ashish Enterprises v. Assistant Commissioner Division Shahdara East
The Delhi High Court held that consolidated Show Cause Notices for multiple financial years are permissible under the CGST Act in cases of fraudulent Input Tax Credit, and directed the petitioner to file an appeal against the impugned order.
M/S MAGGU MULTIVENTURES PVT. LTD. v. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS-IMPORT INLAND CONTAINER DEPOT, TUGHLAKABAD, NEW DELHI & ORS.
The Delhi High Court allowed provisional release of imported Roasted Areca Nuts for industrial use only, subject to an undertaking and security deposit, despite conflicting reports on their fitness for human consumption.
M/S SUMIT SAREE CENTRE v. COMMISSIONER OF DGST & ANR
The Delhi High Court held that GST registration cannot be cancelled retrospectively unless the Show Cause Notice proposes such cancellation and the order provides reasons, setting aside the retrospective cancellation order and limiting cancellation to the date of the SCN.
M/S SPMS Abrasive v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order due to lack of proper notice on the GST portal and remanded the matter for fresh hearing, leaving the validity of the impugned notifications to the Supreme Court.
Satya Prakash Ravidas v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed a habeas corpus petition filed after a prolonged delay without plausible explanation, holding that unrelated allegations cannot sustain such a petition.
Manoj Kumar Akhria v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that challenges to tax demands under the CGST Act must be pursued through the statutory appellate remedy under Section 107, dismissing the writ petition and directing the petitioner to file an appeal with pre-deposit.
Manoj Kumar M. v. Union of India and Ors
The Delhi High Court held that suspension extensions without issuance of a charge-sheet are legally unsustainable and set aside such extensions, entitling the petitioner to reinstatement.
12SF8455042 HEAD CONST ROORMAL RETD v. UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner’s pending representations within four weeks by passing a reasoned order, ensuring timely administrative action.
Ved Prakash v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition for default and non-prosecution due to the petitioner's failure to appear.
ABB India Ltd v. Power Finance Corporation Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed ABB India's summary judgment application against Power Finance Corporation and RFC Limited, holding that serious triable issues exist regarding contract liability, admissibility, and jurisdiction, requiring a full trial.
Union of India & Ors. v. Sub Hony Lt Rajesh Kumar Retd
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising during service are attributable to military service unless rebutted, and limited its review to errors of law under certiorari jurisdiction.
Union of India v. IC-44476M Col Laxmi Chand Dahiya (Retd)
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising post-entry are service-related unless rebutted by the employer.
Puneet Batra v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that searches and seizures involving advocates must respect attorney-client privilege and be conducted with procedural safeguards, permitting GST officials to examine seized electronic devices only in the advocate's presence and subject to strict conditions.
K. S. Rekhi v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed MCD and DDA to consider petitioners' license applications for selling meat at Dabri Mor market subject to compliance with MCD policy and Aircraft Rules, 1937, and exempted petitioners from fresh fees where already paid.
SH VIPUL AGGARWAL v. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file a regularization application within two weeks and restrained the MCD from taking coercive action during its pendency, directing expeditious consideration of the application.
IHOME AND INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD & ORS v. THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellate court's discretion to direct a 20% deposit under Section 148 of the NI Act pending appeal against conviction under Section 138, dismissing the petitioners' challenge for waiver absent prima facie invalidity or sufficient proof of hardship.
Nikhil @ Sonu v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail applications of accused in a murder case, holding that despite hostile eyewitnesses, forensic evidence and weapon recovery established a prima facie case against them.
Emma Odogwu Emeafu v. Narcotic Control Bureau
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of the accused in a narcotics trafficking case, holding that the statutory bar under Section 37 of the NDPS Act applies due to possession of commercial quantity of narcotics and failure to satisfy conditions for bail.