Delhi High Court
59,406 judgments
Kamal Kumar Makhija; Deepti Makhija; Radha Makhija v. Kamal Kapoor; M/s. 3K Enterprises; The Clovia V35; Arif Khan; Vineet Kant Parashar
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, the court's role is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed an arbitrator to adjudicate lease disputes.
LUOSSAVAARA KIIRUNAVAARA AB v. THE ASSISTANT CONTROLLER OF PATENTS AND DESIGNS
The Delhi High Court set aside the refusal of a patent application for lack of reasoned findings on double patenting and other objections, remanding the matter for fresh consideration with proper opportunity to the applicant.
Union of India v. Ex NK Jadish Chandra DSC
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal’s grant of disability pension to an ex-serviceman, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising during service are service-connected unless rebutted, and limiting its interference under certiorari jurisdiction.
Ajay v. State
The Delhi High Court held that the appellant was a juvenile under the Juvenile Justice Act, 2000 at the time of the offence and set aside his conviction and sentence under the IPC, ordering his release.
Dr. Anuj Kumar and Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioners to exercise a one-time option for the Old Pension Scheme based on their recruitment advertisement date prior to 22.12.2003, directing ESIC to implement the benefit despite contrary views of the Department of Expenditure.
Inder Singh v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted probate of a duly executed Will under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, exempting the petitioner from furnishing a surety bond due to No Objection Certificates from natural legal heirs.
Raj Kumar v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that a writ petition challenging a Recovery Notice under the Employees’ Compensation Act is not maintainable without an appeal against the compensation order, and upheld the employer-employee relationship and entitlement to compensation.
Lava International Ltd. v. Anurag Gupta
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging an arbitral award for non-production of original documents, affirming the limited scope of judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Anmol Tradex Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 25 Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside an order under Section 148A(3) of the Income Tax Act for non-consideration of the assessee's last reply and remanded the matter for a fresh reasoned order.
Manmeet Singh; Yashvardhan Bandi; Saru Sharma v. Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the IBBI’s disciplinary order suspending an Insolvency Professional for excess fee withdrawal and procedural violations during liquidation and CIRP, affirming the Board’s inspection and disciplinary powers under the IBC.
Sh. Rohtas Kumar v. Ms. Vandana Devi
The High Court held that an order dismissing an application for restoration of proceedings is interlocutory and not amenable to revision under Section 115 CPC, leading to dismissal of the petition.
Bhupinder Singh v. Ajit Pal Singh Bindra & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that non-joinder or misjoinder of parties is not a ground for dismissal of a plaint under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC and dismissed the petition as withdrawn, leaving all rights open for trial court adjudication.
Rekha v. Kamla Devi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the appellate court to expeditiously decide a nine-year pending civil appeal after arguments were concluded, emphasizing timely justice under Article 227.
Rakesh Kumar Gupta v. Govt. of NCTD & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that procedural rules cannot override substantial justice and allowed additional pleadings and documents to be taken on record by the Central Administrative Tribunal despite delay.
M/S HARI DASHAN SEVASHRAM PVT. LTD. v. M/S PAUL SALES PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court held that summary judgment under Order XIII-A CPC cannot be granted based on a running ledger account without finality, requiring trial to determine disputed claims.
Anju Chadha v. Bhavesh Madan
The Delhi High Court held that a plaint cannot be partially rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC and that triable issues regarding joint family ownership and benami transactions require trial, dismissing the defendant's application to reject the plaint concerning a disputed property.
Amita Kishore Mansukhani v. Vikram Krishna & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's application for decree on admissions in a partition suit, holding that no clear and unequivocal admissions were made by defendants and documents were not properly proved.
National Institute of Fashion Technology v. Vijay Kumar Dua
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing retrospective consideration of respondents' promotion to Professor based on their ante-dated Associate Professor promotions, dismissing the petitioners' objections.
J K Rohatgi v. National Building Construction Corporation Ltd & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of an employee for proven misconduct, holding that a disciplinary authority’s tentative disagreement note is not a final order and that the Court’s interference in disciplinary matters is limited to procedural irregularities.
Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan & Anr. v. Y S Saini
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order that service as Yoga Teacher counts towards Selection Scale after conversion to PET, and disallowed post-retirement recovery without prior notice.