Delhi High Court

29,725 judgments

Year:

Suraj Garg v. State & Anr

09 Sep 2025 · Sanjeev Narula · 2025:DHC:7867

The Delhi High Court quashed the summoning order under Section 420 IPC against the petitioner, holding that the material did not disclose the essential ingredients of cheating and the criminal proceedings amounted to abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 420 IPC cheating summoning order Section 482 CrPC

Aashim & Anr. v. State

09 Sep 2025 · Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:7839

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 489C IPC for possession of counterfeit currency, emphasizing the sufficiency of credible police evidence and the accused's failure to explain possession, while reducing the sentence on mitigating grounds.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant counterfeit currency Section 489C IPC possession knowledge and intention

Hi Tech Arai Private Limited v. Paul Components Private Limited & Ors.

09 Sep 2025 · Amit Bansal · 2025:DHC:7819

The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction to the plaintiff restraining defendants from using the 'HTA' mark and similar trade dress, holding that the plaintiff demonstrated prior use and defendants fabricated evidence to claim prior rights.

civil appeal_allowed Significant passing off trademark infringement interim injunction prior use

Abiyan Capital India Pvt Ltd v. Meena; Ashok Kumar Kaurav

09 Sep 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025 SCC OnLine Del 3022
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that the court's role is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement, leaving substantive disputes to arbitration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 11(6) Arbitration and Conciliation Act appointment of arbitrator prima facie examination arbitration agreement

M/S Noorjahan Begum v. General Manager Northern Railways

09 Sep 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025 SCC OnLine Del 3022

The Delhi High Court appointed an independent arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, limiting its role to a prima facie examination of the arbitration agreement's existence and leaving substantive disputes to arbitration.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Appointment of arbitrator Prima facie examination

M/S Abdul Gaffur Ahmad Noor v. General Manager Northern Railways

09 Sep 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:8619
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court appointed an independent arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, limiting its role to a prima facie examination of the arbitration agreement's existence and leaving substantive disputes to arbitration.

other petition_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Appointment of arbitrator Prima facie examination

Narendra Pal Singh Soam v. Union of India through Ministry of Home Affairs

09 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:8578-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a government appointment made with full knowledge of qualifications cannot be rescinded years later, quashing the dismissal of an ex-serviceman SI and directing payment of retiral benefits.

administrative petition_allowed Significant ex-serviceman recruitment Staff Selection Commission Sub-Inspector appointment educational qualification eligibility

Sahil Paliwal v. Union of India and Others

09 Sep 2025 · Vikas Mahajan · 2025:DHC:8380

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner’s writ challenging NEET UG 2025 results and counselling exclusion, holding that official records are presumed correct absent credible evidence of forgery or error.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant NEET UG 2025 National Testing Agency scorecard forgery official record presumption

Ramanbhai Chhaganbhai Patel v. Religare Finvest Ltd.

09 Sep 2025 · Jasmeet Singh · 2025:DHC:8292

The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte arbitral award due to failure to serve the petitioner adequately and unilateral appointment of the sole arbitrator, holding such violations breach natural justice and public policy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitral Award Section 34 Arbitration and Conciliation Act Ex-parte proceedings Natural justice

Simranjit Singh Gandhi v. M/s CIDP Biotech India Pvt Ltd

09 Sep 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025 SCC OnLine Del 3022
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, limiting its role to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and leaving substantive disputes to arbitration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Arbitration agreement Prima facie examination

Kamal Kumar Makhija; Deepti Makhija; Radha Makhija v. Kamal Kapoor; M/s. 3K Enterprises; The Clovia V35; Arif Khan; Vineet Kant Parashar

09 Sep 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:8270

The Delhi High Court held that under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, the court's role is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed an arbitrator to adjudicate lease disputes.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 arbitration agreement prima facie examination

LUOSSAVAARA KIIRUNAVAARA AB v. THE ASSISTANT CONTROLLER OF PATENTS AND DESIGNS

09 Sep 2025 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2025:DHC:8256
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court set aside the refusal of a patent application for lack of reasoned findings on double patenting and other objections, remanding the matter for fresh consideration with proper opportunity to the applicant.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant patent application double patenting Section 3(f) Patents Act Section 10(5) Patents Act

Union of India v. Ex NK Jadish Chandra DSC

09 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:8183-DB
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal’s grant of disability pension to an ex-serviceman, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising during service are service-connected unless rebutted, and limiting its interference under certiorari jurisdiction.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension armed forces tribunal Medical Board presumption of sound health

Ajay v. State

09 Sep 2025 · Subramonium Prasad; Vimal Kumar Yadav · 2025:DHC:8245-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the appellant was a juvenile under the Juvenile Justice Act, 2000 at the time of the offence and set aside his conviction and sentence under the IPC, ordering his release.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant juvenile justice age determination juvenile offender Bone Ossification Test

Dr. Anuj Kumar and Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.

09 Sep 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:8037-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioners to exercise a one-time option for the Old Pension Scheme based on their recruitment advertisement date prior to 22.12.2003, directing ESIC to implement the benefit despite contrary views of the Department of Expenditure.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Old Pension Scheme New Pension Scheme Employees’ State Insurance Corporation Office Memorandum 03.03.2023

Inder Singh v. State & Ors.

09 Sep 2025 · Amit Bansal · 2025:DHC:8181

The Delhi High Court granted probate of a duly executed Will under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, exempting the petitioner from furnishing a surety bond due to No Objection Certificates from natural legal heirs.

civil petition_allowed probate Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276 Will

Raj Kumar v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi

09 Sep 2025 · Subramonium Prasad; Vimal Kumar Yadav · 2025:DHC:8180-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that a writ petition challenging a Recovery Notice under the Employees’ Compensation Act is not maintainable without an appeal against the compensation order, and upheld the employer-employee relationship and entitlement to compensation.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Employees’ Compensation Act, 1932 Section 30 appeal Recovery Notice employer-employee relationship

Lava International Ltd. v. Anurag Gupta

09 Sep 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar · 2025:DHC:7895-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging an arbitral award for non-production of original documents, affirming the limited scope of judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Section 37 patent illegality

Anmol Tradex Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 25 Delhi

09 Sep 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar · 2025:DHC:7966-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside an order under Section 148A(3) of the Income Tax Act for non-consideration of the assessee's last reply and remanded the matter for a fresh reasoned order.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 Section 148A(1) Section 148A(3)

Manmeet Singh; Yashvardhan Bandi; Saru Sharma v. Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India

09 Sep 2025 · Subramonium Prasad · 2025:DHC:8086

The Delhi High Court upheld the IBBI’s disciplinary order suspending an Insolvency Professional for excess fee withdrawal and procedural violations during liquidation and CIRP, affirming the Board’s inspection and disciplinary powers under the IBC.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code Inspection and Investigation Disciplinary Proceedings Liquidator's Fee