Delhi High Court
59,406 judgments
Ved Prakash v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition for default and non-prosecution due to the petitioner's failure to appear.
ABB India Ltd v. Power Finance Corporation Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed ABB India's summary judgment application against Power Finance Corporation and RFC Limited, holding that serious triable issues exist regarding contract liability, admissibility, and jurisdiction, requiring a full trial.
Union of India & Ors. v. Sub Hony Lt Rajesh Kumar Retd
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising during service are attributable to military service unless rebutted, and limited its review to errors of law under certiorari jurisdiction.
Union of India v. IC-44476M Col Laxmi Chand Dahiya (Retd)
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising post-entry are service-related unless rebutted by the employer.
Puneet Batra v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that searches and seizures involving advocates must respect attorney-client privilege and be conducted with procedural safeguards, permitting GST officials to examine seized electronic devices only in the advocate's presence and subject to strict conditions.
K. S. Rekhi v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed MCD and DDA to consider petitioners' license applications for selling meat at Dabri Mor market subject to compliance with MCD policy and Aircraft Rules, 1937, and exempted petitioners from fresh fees where already paid.
SH VIPUL AGGARWAL v. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file a regularization application within two weeks and restrained the MCD from taking coercive action during its pendency, directing expeditious consideration of the application.
IHOME AND INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD & ORS v. THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellate court's discretion to direct a 20% deposit under Section 148 of the NI Act pending appeal against conviction under Section 138, dismissing the petitioners' challenge for waiver absent prima facie invalidity or sufficient proof of hardship.
Nikhil @ Sonu v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail applications of accused in a murder case, holding that despite hostile eyewitnesses, forensic evidence and weapon recovery established a prima facie case against them.
Emma Odogwu Emeafu v. Narcotic Control Bureau
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of the accused in a narcotics trafficking case, holding that the statutory bar under Section 37 of the NDPS Act applies due to possession of commercial quantity of narcotics and failure to satisfy conditions for bail.
Sagar Ujjwal @ Udham v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to an accused charged only under arms provisions for facilitating weapon supply in a murder case, emphasizing limited role and circumstantial evidence at the bail stage.
Suleman @ Monu v. State
The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant in a POCSO case due to failure of the child victim to identify him and absence of foundational evidence to invoke the presumption under Section 29 of the POCSO Act.
Vijay Ujjwal v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner charged under the Arms Act as a facilitator, holding that circumstantial evidence and disclosure statements are insufficient to deny bail absent direct proof and given the limited role attributed.
Manno Devi v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted interim protection against demolition of the petitioner’s property pending hearing of the appeal before the Appellate Tribunal MCD due to the tribunal’s non-functionality.
Rohit Singh v. Delhi University & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a preventive suspension does not disqualify a student from contesting DUSU elections and directed the University to consider the petitioner’s nomination in accordance with rules.
Sadique Ahmad @Nanhe & Ors. v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 452, 323, 341, and 34 IPC based on a voluntary amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to secure ends of justice.
Rabi Ghosh v. Jayanta Kumar Ghosh
The High Court upheld the trial court's order closing further cross examination due to the petitioner's deliberate delays, emphasizing that the right to cross examine is not absolute and must be exercised within reasonable limits.
Neelam Arora and Anr v. Manju Arora
The Delhi High Court held that an owner can evict a daughter-in-law from a shared household under the PWDV Act by providing alternate accommodation without awaiting trial on domestic violence allegations.
Abhishek Verma and Others v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 420 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Romy Mehra & Anr. v. Gautam Mehra & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed an interim injunction directing the daughter-in-law to vacate the matrimonial home with alternate accommodation, balancing ownership rights and the right of residence under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act.