Delhi High Court

59,406 judgments

Year:

Sanju @ Ashwani & Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

10 Sep 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:7919

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under dowry and related IPC sections on the basis of an amicable settlement between estranged spouses, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to serve the ends of justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute amicable settlement

Lakshya Sharma v. Union of India & Anr.

10 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:7915-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner’s pending representation against transfer on compassionate grounds within four weeks and stayed any adverse decision for one week to enable legal remedies.

administrative other transfer order compassionate grounds pending representation stay of operation

Harendra Kumar v. State of NCT Delhi & Anr.

09 Sep 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:7869

The Delhi High Court upheld the grant of bail to an accused under the SC/ST Act, holding that bail cancellation requires cogent reasons and the Trial Court’s order was legally sound and not perverse.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant bail cancellation SC/ST Act Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Section 41A CrPC

Rajinder Pal Singh Bhatia v. The State & Ors.

09 Sep 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:7816-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of the Will dated 15.05.1994, dismissing the competing Will dated 15.11.1994 for lack of proper proof, affirming the testator's testamentary freedom and evidentiary requirements under the Indian Succession Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Probate Petition Will execution Indian Succession Act 1925 Attesting witnesses

Esam Ahmad Bilgrami v. Aaliyah Saeed Dang

09 Sep 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:7829-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's interim order permitting the mother to relocate the minor child to Abu Dhabi, emphasizing the child's welfare as paramount and validating safeguards for the father's access.

family appeal_dismissed Significant Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 Section 12 interim custody child relocation child welfare

Sakshi & Anr. v. Radhey Shyam & Anr.

09 Sep 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:7861

The Delhi High Court held that striking off the entire defence for non-appearance during concluding cross-examination is not justified and granted a last opportunity to conclude the cross-examination.

civil appeal_allowed Significant cross-examination striking off defence non-appearance trial court discretion

Raj Krishan Gupta and Ors v. Principal Director of Income Tax (Investigation) -1 New Delhi

09 Sep 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Saurabh Banerjee · 2025:DHC:7856-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of searches and seizures under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act based on bona fide reasons to believe, dismissing the petitioners' challenge to the search of their lockers.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Section 132 Income Tax Act search and seizure reasons to believe CBDT Instruction 1916

Gaurav Rajgaria v. Maruti Suzuki India Limited & Ors.

09 Sep 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025 INSC 485

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal against rejection of the plaint challenging wrongful termination, holding that claims for damages and procedural impropriety are maintainable despite the bar on specific performance of employment contracts.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC Specific Relief Act Section 14 employment contract termination mala fide termination

Madnani Engineerings Works v. Union of India and Another

09 Sep 2025 · Devender Kumar Upadhyay, CJ; Tushar Rao Gedela, J · 2025:DHC:7834-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging rejection of the petitioner’s bid in a tender reserved for MSEs, holding that the petitioner was not an OEM for the specific product (Jerrycans) as required by the tender conditions.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Micro and Small Enterprises Original Equipment Manufacturer Vendor Assessment Report Government e-Marketplace

SNS Engineering Pvt. Ltd. v. M/S Hariom Projects Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.

09 Sep 2025 · Jasmeet Singh · 2025:DHC:7868

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for appointment of an arbitrator on the ground that the arbitration clause confers exclusive jurisdiction on the courts at Ahmedabad, which is deemed the seat of arbitration.

arbitration petition_dismissed Significant arbitration clause exclusive jurisdiction seat of arbitration Section 11(6) Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Suraj Garg v. State & Anr

09 Sep 2025 · Sanjeev Narula · 2025:DHC:7867

The Delhi High Court quashed the summoning order under Section 420 IPC against the petitioner, holding that the material did not disclose the essential ingredients of cheating and the criminal proceedings amounted to abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 420 IPC cheating summoning order Section 482 CrPC

Aashim & Anr. v. State

09 Sep 2025 · Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:7839

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 489C IPC for possession of counterfeit currency, emphasizing the sufficiency of credible police evidence and the accused's failure to explain possession, while reducing the sentence on mitigating grounds.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant counterfeit currency Section 489C IPC possession knowledge and intention

Hi Tech Arai Private Limited v. Paul Components Private Limited & Ors.

09 Sep 2025 · Amit Bansal · 2025:DHC:7819

The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction to the plaintiff restraining defendants from using the 'HTA' mark and similar trade dress, holding that the plaintiff demonstrated prior use and defendants fabricated evidence to claim prior rights.

civil appeal_allowed Significant passing off trademark infringement interim injunction prior use

Abiyan Capital India Pvt Ltd v. Meena; Ashok Kumar Kaurav

09 Sep 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025 SCC OnLine Del 3022
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that the court's role is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement, leaving substantive disputes to arbitration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 11(6) Arbitration and Conciliation Act appointment of arbitrator prima facie examination arbitration agreement

M/S Noorjahan Begum v. General Manager Northern Railways

09 Sep 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025 SCC OnLine Del 3022

The Delhi High Court appointed an independent arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, limiting its role to a prima facie examination of the arbitration agreement's existence and leaving substantive disputes to arbitration.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Appointment of arbitrator Prima facie examination

M/S Abdul Gaffur Ahmad Noor v. General Manager Northern Railways

09 Sep 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:8619
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court appointed an independent arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, limiting its role to a prima facie examination of the arbitration agreement's existence and leaving substantive disputes to arbitration.

other petition_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Appointment of arbitrator Prima facie examination

Narendra Pal Singh Soam v. Union of India through Ministry of Home Affairs

09 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:8578-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a government appointment made with full knowledge of qualifications cannot be rescinded years later, quashing the dismissal of an ex-serviceman SI and directing payment of retiral benefits.

administrative petition_allowed Significant ex-serviceman recruitment Staff Selection Commission Sub-Inspector appointment educational qualification eligibility

Sahil Paliwal v. Union of India and Others

09 Sep 2025 · Vikas Mahajan · 2025:DHC:8380

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner’s writ challenging NEET UG 2025 results and counselling exclusion, holding that official records are presumed correct absent credible evidence of forgery or error.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant NEET UG 2025 National Testing Agency scorecard forgery official record presumption

Ramanbhai Chhaganbhai Patel v. Religare Finvest Ltd.

09 Sep 2025 · Jasmeet Singh · 2025:DHC:8292

The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte arbitral award due to failure to serve the petitioner adequately and unilateral appointment of the sole arbitrator, holding such violations breach natural justice and public policy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitral Award Section 34 Arbitration and Conciliation Act Ex-parte proceedings Natural justice

Simranjit Singh Gandhi v. M/s CIDP Biotech India Pvt Ltd

09 Sep 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025 SCC OnLine Del 3022
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, limiting its role to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and leaving substantive disputes to arbitration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Arbitration agreement Prima facie examination