Delhi High Court

29,725 judgments

Year:

Suresh v. State NCT of Delhi

16 Sep 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:8173

The Delhi High Court dismissed bail to a habitual offender charged with attempted murder and arms offences, emphasizing the gravity of the charges and criminal history over delay and discrepancies in investigation.

criminal appeal_dismissed bail Section 307 IPC Arms Act criminal record

Amit Rajak v. The State of NCT of Delhi

16 Sep 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:8165

The Delhi High Court upheld the decision to try a nearly 18-year-old accused as an adult for heinous sexual offences against a minor, holding that the juvenile justice board's delayed but thorough preliminary assessment validly established his mental capacity and maturity.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant juvenile justice preliminary assessment mental capacity heinous offence

NOUAM FINANCIAL CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD. v. THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT DELHI)

16 Sep 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:8171

The High Court held that the presumption under Section 139 of the NI Act applies and disputed questions about the cheque being a security or discharge of debt must be decided at trial, dismissing the petition to quash proceedings under Section 138.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 139 NI Act presumption quashing of complaint security cheque

Novartis AG v. Controller of Patents and Designs & Anr.

16 Sep 2025 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petitions, holding that the petitioner waived its right to cross-examine opponent’s experts by not seeking it at the earliest stage and that denial of belated cross-examination does not violate natural justice.

intellectual_property appeal_dismissed Significant post-grant opposition cross-examination patent validity rebuttal evidence

Hemant Kumar Goyal alias Harish Goyal trading as Goyal Traders v. Yashwant Jain trading as Jain Traders

16 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:7803-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside an interim order granting trademark infringement and passing off relief due to contradictory findings and lack of prima facie goodwill, remitting the matter for fresh consideration.

civil appeal_allowed Procedural trademark infringement passing off interim injunction Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC

Ajay Kumar Garg v. Amit Kumar & Anr.

16 Sep 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:8823

The High Court upheld the trial court's dismissal of the petitioner's application to reject the plaint, holding that the plaint disclosed a cause of action and that Delhi courts had territorial jurisdiction as part of the cause of action arose there.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC cause of action territorial jurisdiction Section 20(c) CPC

Pradeep @ Vikram @ Vicky v. The State (NCT of Delhi)

16 Sep 2025 · Subramonium Prasad; Vimal Kumar Yadav · 2025:DHC:8711-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the appellant's murder conviction under Section 302 IPC due to insufficient proof of intention and cause of death, substituting it with conviction under Section 304 Part II IPC for culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant murder culpable homicide Section 302 IPC Section 304 Part II IPC

BS v. State (NCT of Delhi)

16 Sep 2025 · Sanjeev Narula · 2025:DHC:8647
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and 20-year sentence of a father for aggravated sexual assault of his minor daughter, affirming the sufficiency of corroborated victim testimony and DNA evidence, and validating trial court's sentencing discretion under pre-amendment POCSO.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant sexual assault POCSO Act DNA profiling child victim testimony

Sushila Bhatnagar v. Union of India

16 Sep 2025 · Nitin Wasudeo Sambre; Anish Dayal · 2025:DHC:8582-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking enhanced compensation and rehabilitation benefits under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 due to inordinate delay and failure to comply with statutory time limits for reference under Section 18.

property petition_dismissed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 18 reference enhanced compensation delay and laches

Moneywise Financial Services Pvt Ltd v. Muskan Engineering & Ors.

16 Sep 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:8547
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, the court's role is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed an arbitrator accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 Appointment of Arbitrator Prima facie examination

Director Bureau of Outreach and Communication v. Chitra Sharma

16 Sep 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:8449-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT order directing correction of pay anomaly ensuring Staff Artists do not receive higher grade pay than superior Programme Officers, maintaining cadre hierarchy.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant pay anomaly grade pay Staff Artist Programme Officer

M/S R.U. Overseas v. Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax

16 Sep 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:8343-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the petitioner to challenge overlapping GST demand orders through statutory appeals with regulated pre-deposit, dismissing the writ petition for lack of alternative remedy exhaustion.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Goods and Services Tax Input Tax Credit Overlapping GST demands Pre-deposit in GST appeals

Deepak Gupta v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 43(1), Delhi & Ors.

16 Sep 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar · 2025:DHC:8217-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the reopening order under Sections 148 and 148A(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, directing the Assessing Officer to reconsider the petitioner's replies after hearing him within eight weeks.

tax appeal_allowed Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 Section 148A(3) reopening of assessment

Shivani Sharma v. Centre for Railway Information System & Anr.

16 Sep 2025 · Amit Bansal · 2025:DHC:8405

The court held that upon lease expiry, the lessee must surrender possession to the lessor and dismissed the defendant’s application to recall the rent arrears order beyond permitted scope, releasing the deposited rent to the plaintiff.

civil appeal_dismissed lease expiry vacant possession rent arrears House Rent Allowance

Janata Shikshan Prasarak Mandals Womens B Ed College v. National Council for Teacher Education

16 Sep 2025 · Vikas Mahajan · 2025 SCC OnLine Del 5683

The Delhi High Court quashed the withdrawal of recognition of a B.Ed. college by NCTE due to vague and non-specific Show Cause Notice, emphasizing the necessity of clear allegations for fair hearing.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Show Cause Notice Natural Justice Withdrawal of Recognition NCTE Regulations

Taufik Khan Proprietor of TLD Traders v. Union of India & Ors.

16 Sep 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:8219-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order due to lack of proper notice and opportunity to be heard, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of the impugned notification to the Supreme Court.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Show Cause Notice GST portal Additional Notices Tab Section 168A Central GST Act

Mushlina v. Commissioner of Customs

16 Sep 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:8223-DB

The Delhi High Court directed implementation of the Customs Appellate Authority's order releasing seized gold upon payment of fine and duty, emphasizing the Customs Department's duty to serve notice of revisions and ensure representation.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Customs Act, 1962 Order-in-Appeal redemption fine warehousing charges

M/s Muchipara Consumers Co-operative Stores Ltd v. Union of India & Ors.

16 Sep 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:8218-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) lacks jurisdiction over forfeiture of EMD in e-auctions and permitted the petitioner to challenge the forfeiture and refund orders before the CESTAT.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Earnest Money Deposit Forfeiture Customs Act, 1962 Commissioner of Customs (Appeals)

M/S SAP INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (IMPORT) NEW CUSTOMS HOUSE NEAR IGI AIRPORT NEW DELHI

16 Sep 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:8220-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal restoring it to CESTAT for merits hearing, holding that DRI officers are proper officers under Section 28 of the Customs Act as per the Supreme Court's ruling in Canon-II.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Customs Act 1962 Section 28 proper officer Directorate of Revenue Intelligence

Rinki Rani v. Chinta Ram

16 Sep 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:8259-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the dismissal of a maintenance petition under Section 19 of HAMA for a widowed daughter-in-law, holding that the Family Court must allow evidence before deciding on the respondent's means and property status.

family appeal_allowed Significant Hindu Adoption & Maintenance Act, 1956 Section 19 maintenance widowed daughter-in-law