Delhi High Court

29,725 judgments

Year:

Jahangir v. State (NCT of Delhi)

17 Sep 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:8268

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under the POCSO Act, applying the presumption of guilt once foundational facts were established, dismissing the appellant's claim of false implication.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant POCSO Act Section 29 POCSO presumption of guilt child sexual assault

Petitioner v. Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr

17 Sep 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:8252
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed an unmarried woman to medically terminate a pregnancy over 20 weeks caused by sexual abuse, affirming her constitutional right to reproductive choice under Article 21 and directing DNA evidence collection for investigation.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 Article 21 reproductive rights bodily integrity

Janak Kumari Gandhi & Ors. v. Registrar Co-operative Society & Ors.

17 Sep 2025 · Nitin Wasudeo Sambre; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2025:DHC:8255-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Registrar Co-operative Societies' belated review petition and upheld the direction to regularize self-draw allotments conducted before 2010, affirming the limited scope of review jurisdiction and the RCS's duty to comply.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Review petition Registrar Co-operative Societies Self-draw allotment Regularization

Jain Shikanji Private Limited v. Satish Kumar Jain

17 Sep 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:8248-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld civil imprisonment for wilful disobedience of a trademark injunction and false undertakings by the appellant company and its director.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant wilful disobedience ad-interim injunction trademark infringement contempt of court

M/S SPMS Abrasive v. Union of India & Ors.

17 Sep 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:8364-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order due to lack of proper notice and hearing, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of extension notifications open pending Supreme Court review.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Goods and Services Tax Section 168A GST Act Show Cause Notice Fair opportunity to be heard

Shri Bali Arya v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

17 Sep 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:8265

The Delhi High Court granted interim protection against sealing of the petitioner's shop pending appeal before the ATMCD, holding that the Civil Court suit was not maintainable due to availability of statutory remedy.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Sealing Order Principles of Natural Justice Show Cause Notice Statutory Remedy

Pooja Chopra v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

17 Sep 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:8264

The Delhi High Court restrained demolition of the petitioner’s property pending her appeal before the non-functional municipal appellate tribunal, without deciding on merits.

administrative petition_allowed Demolition Order Municipal Corporation of Delhi Appellate Tribunal Municipal Corporation of Delhi interim relief

Survesh R v. State NCT of Delhi and Ors.

17 Sep 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:8225

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 279 IPC and 185 Motor Vehicle Act based on an amicable settlement, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and serve the ends of justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR amicable settlement Section 279 IPC

Mahesh Malkani v. Commissioner of Customs

17 Sep 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:8278-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a single Rolex watch cannot be deemed commercial quantity under the Customs Act and allowed the petitioner to redeem the detained watch by paying the redemption fine despite the lapse of the stipulated period.

administrative petition_dismissed Customs Act 1962 confiscation redemption of goods commercial quantity

Manish Nautiyal & Anr. v. The State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

17 Sep 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:8229

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a voluntary and amicable settlement between estranged spouses, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC matrimonial dispute

Tarun Arora v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

17 Sep 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:8231

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 279 and 337 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC amicable settlement non-compoundable offences

Ms. Shadiya v. State of NCT Delhi & Ors.

17 Sep 2025 · Vivek Chaudhary; Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:8288-DB

The Court dismissed the Habeas Corpus petition seeking the return of a major woman found residing voluntarily, affirming her right to personal liberty and choice of residence.

constitutional petition_dismissed Habeas Corpus personal liberty major illegal confinement

Sachin Nadia v. Union of India & Ors.

17 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:8284-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to re-file after impleading necessary parties and disposed of the petition accordingly.

constitutional other Procedural writ petition withdrawal liberty to re-file impleading parties

Late Sh Pramod Kumar Jain & Ors. v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.

17 Sep 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:8212-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the appellants' claims were barred by limitation from the date of their first written assertion in 2003, and subsequent arbitration invoked in 2008 was time-barred.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Limitation Act, 1963 Cause of action Assertion of claim

M/S Chopra Marketing Private Limited v. M/S Drishticon Properties Private Limited & Ors.

17 Sep 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:8206-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the nature of the transaction, not the residential character of the property, determines jurisdiction under the Commercial Courts Act, and set aside the dismissal of execution proceedings on jurisdictional grounds.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Commercial Courts Act, 2015 commercial dispute jurisdiction execution petition

Surender Kumar v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

17 Sep 2025 · Amit Sharma · 2025:DHC:8227

The Delhi High Court held that only persons actually conducting business from acquired shops are entitled to alternative allotment under the rehabilitation policy, dismissing the petitioner's claim based solely on ownership.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Relocation and Rehabilitation policy Project affected persons Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Alternative shop allotment

Roop Chand v. State

17 Sep 2025 · Amit Sharma
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court acquitted two accused in a corruption case due to failure of prosecution to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt, emphasizing the necessity of foundational evidence for conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 demand and acceptance Section 7 PC Act Section 13(1)(d) PC Act

Laxmi Jha v. State

17 Sep 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:8234
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The High Court quashed summons under Section 306 IPC, holding that mere harassment without evidence of instigation does not constitute abetment of suicide.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 306 IPC Abetment of suicide Suicide note Section 482 CrPC

Reliance Gen Ins Co Ltd v. Rashid Ali

17 Sep 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court modified the compensation award in a motor accident claim by reducing future prospects to 40%, setting aside the Tribunal's reduced functional disability finding, and remanding for recalculation of compensation including prosthetic costs and wages based on 80% disability.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim permanent disability functional disability future prospects

Rajender Prasad Sharma v. Court of Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities & Anr.

17 Sep 2025 · Prateek Jalan · 2025:DHC:8293

The Delhi High Court directed the Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities to reconsider the petitioner’s disability-related grievances post-certification, clarifying the limited scope of the Commissioner’s powers and the writ jurisdiction regarding employment disputes with private entities.

administrative other Significant Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities disability certificate reasonable accommodation