Delhi High Court

59,406 judgments

Year:

Bhanu Chaudhary v. Geeta Rani Alias Geeta Bansal

18 Sep 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:8269

The Delhi High Court upheld rejection of plaint for defective valuation where a non-executant plaintiff sought declaration and injunctions without paying court fees based on market value of the property.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC Court Fees Act valuation of suit declaration of nullity

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -1 v. FIS Global Business Solutions India Pvt. Ltd.

17 Sep 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar · 2025:DHC:8235-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT’s decision that an Advance Pricing Agreement has persuasive value for years not covered by it when FAR remains unchanged, leading to deletion of transfer pricing adjustments.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Advance Pricing Agreement Transfer Pricing Functions Performed Assets Employed Risks Assumed Income Tax Act 1961

Man Mohan Singh Attri v. Union of India & Ors.

17 Sep 2025 · Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya, C.J.; Tushar Rao Gedela, J. · 2025:DHC:8214-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld the demolition order of structurally unsafe apartments under Section 348 of the DMC Act, ruling that expert opinions relied upon by the competent authority are binding and judicial interference is unwarranted.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Section 348 Delhi Municipal Corporation Act dangerous buildings structural safety expert opinion

Siya through her next friend Kajal Kumari and Anr. v. Election Committee Dayal Singh College and Anr.

17 Sep 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:8233

The Delhi High Court held that Dayal Singh College elections shall be conducted through Ballot Papers as per the college's procedure, dismissing the petition seeking EVM-based elections.

administrative petition_dismissed election procedure Electronic Voting Machines Ballot Papers college elections

Siya v. Election Committee Dayal Singh College

17 Sep 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:8233

The Delhi High Court allowed students to contest college elections after rectifying minor clerical errors in surety bonds accompanying their nomination forms.

administrative petition_allowed Significant student election nomination form surety bond clerical mistake

Pramod Vashisht v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation

17 Sep 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:8415-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the compulsory retirement order of a government servant, holding that later good service records and promotions must be considered and that such orders must be bona fide and based on valid material.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant compulsory retirement FR 56(j) CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 judicial review

Jai Kishan v. Gauri Shankar & Anr

17 Sep 2025 · Saurabh Banerjee · 2025:DHC:8200
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant's revision petition upholding the eviction order based on the landlords' better title and bona fide requirement under the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Eviction Petition Landlord-Tenant Relationship Bona Fide Requirement

AAJ Supply Chain Management Pvt. Ltd. v. Skylark Express (Delhi) Pvt. Ltd.

17 Sep 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:8230

The High Court allowed the petition to condone delay in filing Written Statement caused by late supply of legible plaint copies, emphasizing adjudication on merits subject to costs.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order VIII Rule 1 CPC Written Statement condonation of delay legible copies

Sarbaj Singh v. Union of India & Ors.

17 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:8213-DB
Cites 6 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and sentence of a BSF officer for aggravated sexual assault of a minor, ruling that procedural irregularities in preliminary evidence recording did not vitiate the lawful GSFC trial and limited judicial review under Article 226.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Border Security Force Act, 1968 General Security Force Court Rule 45B(1)(c) BSF Rules Sexual harassment

M/S N.N. BROTHERS v. COMMISSIONER OF DVAT AND ANR

17 Sep 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:8359-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a taxpayer is entitled to interest on VAT refund from the date the refund application was filed, rejecting the Department's denial based on procedural delays and taxpayer's delay in payment.

tax petition_allowed Significant refund interest on refund Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 Section 42(1)

Jahangir v. State (NCT of Delhi)

17 Sep 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:8268

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under the POCSO Act, applying the presumption of guilt once foundational facts were established, dismissing the appellant's claim of false implication.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant POCSO Act Section 29 POCSO presumption of guilt child sexual assault

Petitioner v. Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr

17 Sep 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:8252
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed an unmarried woman to medically terminate a pregnancy over 20 weeks caused by sexual abuse, affirming her constitutional right to reproductive choice under Article 21 and directing DNA evidence collection for investigation.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 Article 21 reproductive rights bodily integrity

Janak Kumari Gandhi & Ors. v. Registrar Co-operative Society & Ors.

17 Sep 2025 · Nitin Wasudeo Sambre; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2025:DHC:8255-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Registrar Co-operative Societies' belated review petition and upheld the direction to regularize self-draw allotments conducted before 2010, affirming the limited scope of review jurisdiction and the RCS's duty to comply.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Review petition Registrar Co-operative Societies Self-draw allotment Regularization

Jain Shikanji Private Limited v. Satish Kumar Jain

17 Sep 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:8248-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld civil imprisonment for wilful disobedience of a trademark injunction and false undertakings by the appellant company and its director.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant wilful disobedience ad-interim injunction trademark infringement contempt of court

M/S SPMS Abrasive v. Union of India & Ors.

17 Sep 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:8364-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order due to lack of proper notice and hearing, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of extension notifications open pending Supreme Court review.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Goods and Services Tax Section 168A GST Act Show Cause Notice Fair opportunity to be heard

Shri Bali Arya v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

17 Sep 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:8265

The Delhi High Court granted interim protection against sealing of the petitioner's shop pending appeal before the ATMCD, holding that the Civil Court suit was not maintainable due to availability of statutory remedy.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Sealing Order Principles of Natural Justice Show Cause Notice Statutory Remedy

Pooja Chopra v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

17 Sep 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:8264

The Delhi High Court restrained demolition of the petitioner’s property pending her appeal before the non-functional municipal appellate tribunal, without deciding on merits.

administrative petition_allowed Demolition Order Municipal Corporation of Delhi Appellate Tribunal Municipal Corporation of Delhi interim relief

Survesh R v. State NCT of Delhi and Ors.

17 Sep 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:8225

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 279 IPC and 185 Motor Vehicle Act based on an amicable settlement, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and serve the ends of justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR amicable settlement Section 279 IPC

Mahesh Malkani v. Commissioner of Customs

17 Sep 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:8278-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a single Rolex watch cannot be deemed commercial quantity under the Customs Act and allowed the petitioner to redeem the detained watch by paying the redemption fine despite the lapse of the stipulated period.

administrative petition_dismissed Customs Act 1962 confiscation redemption of goods commercial quantity

Manish Nautiyal & Anr. v. The State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

17 Sep 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:8229

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a voluntary and amicable settlement between estranged spouses, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC matrimonial dispute