Delhi High Court

59,406 judgments

Year:

Director Bureau of Outreach and Communication v. Chitra Sharma

16 Sep 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:8449-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT order directing correction of pay anomaly ensuring Staff Artists do not receive higher grade pay than superior Programme Officers, maintaining cadre hierarchy.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant pay anomaly grade pay Staff Artist Programme Officer

M/S R.U. Overseas v. Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax

16 Sep 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:8343-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the petitioner to challenge overlapping GST demand orders through statutory appeals with regulated pre-deposit, dismissing the writ petition for lack of alternative remedy exhaustion.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Goods and Services Tax Input Tax Credit Overlapping GST demands Pre-deposit in GST appeals

Deepak Gupta v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 43(1), Delhi & Ors.

16 Sep 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar · 2025:DHC:8217-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the reopening order under Sections 148 and 148A(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, directing the Assessing Officer to reconsider the petitioner's replies after hearing him within eight weeks.

tax appeal_allowed Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 Section 148A(3) reopening of assessment

Shivani Sharma v. Centre for Railway Information System & Anr.

16 Sep 2025 · Amit Bansal · 2025:DHC:8405

The court held that upon lease expiry, the lessee must surrender possession to the lessor and dismissed the defendant’s application to recall the rent arrears order beyond permitted scope, releasing the deposited rent to the plaintiff.

civil appeal_dismissed lease expiry vacant possession rent arrears House Rent Allowance

Janata Shikshan Prasarak Mandals Womens B Ed College v. National Council for Teacher Education

16 Sep 2025 · Vikas Mahajan · 2025 SCC OnLine Del 5683

The Delhi High Court quashed the withdrawal of recognition of a B.Ed. college by NCTE due to vague and non-specific Show Cause Notice, emphasizing the necessity of clear allegations for fair hearing.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Show Cause Notice Natural Justice Withdrawal of Recognition NCTE Regulations

Taufik Khan Proprietor of TLD Traders v. Union of India & Ors.

16 Sep 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:8219-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order due to lack of proper notice and opportunity to be heard, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of the impugned notification to the Supreme Court.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Show Cause Notice GST portal Additional Notices Tab Section 168A Central GST Act

Mushlina v. Commissioner of Customs

16 Sep 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:8223-DB

The Delhi High Court directed implementation of the Customs Appellate Authority's order releasing seized gold upon payment of fine and duty, emphasizing the Customs Department's duty to serve notice of revisions and ensure representation.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Customs Act, 1962 Order-in-Appeal redemption fine warehousing charges

M/s Muchipara Consumers Co-operative Stores Ltd v. Union of India & Ors.

16 Sep 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:8218-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) lacks jurisdiction over forfeiture of EMD in e-auctions and permitted the petitioner to challenge the forfeiture and refund orders before the CESTAT.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Earnest Money Deposit Forfeiture Customs Act, 1962 Commissioner of Customs (Appeals)

M/S SAP INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (IMPORT) NEW CUSTOMS HOUSE NEAR IGI AIRPORT NEW DELHI

16 Sep 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:8220-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal restoring it to CESTAT for merits hearing, holding that DRI officers are proper officers under Section 28 of the Customs Act as per the Supreme Court's ruling in Canon-II.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Customs Act 1962 Section 28 proper officer Directorate of Revenue Intelligence

Rinki Rani v. Chinta Ram

16 Sep 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:8259-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the dismissal of a maintenance petition under Section 19 of HAMA for a widowed daughter-in-law, holding that the Family Court must allow evidence before deciding on the respondent's means and property status.

family appeal_allowed Significant Hindu Adoption & Maintenance Act, 1956 Section 19 maintenance widowed daughter-in-law

Ajay Malik & Ors. v. Prem Lata & Ors.

16 Sep 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · SCC OnLine Del 5592
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that in partition suits over immovable property, co-sharers are presumed in constructive possession and thus not liable to pay ad valorem Court fee on the partition relief, even if ousted from possession.

civil appeal_allowed Significant partition suit ad valorem Court fee constructive possession co-sharer

Chander Dev v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr.

16 Sep 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:8277-DB

The Delhi High Court held that claims based on subsequent exoneration cannot be raised in a petition challenging earlier promotion denial orders and must be pursued through fresh proceedings.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Departmental Promotion Committee sealed cover promotion disciplinary proceedings

Shri Narottam Singh Shami v. Govt. of NCTD

16 Sep 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:8262-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that employees are entitled to interest on delayed Leave Encashment payments under constitutional provisions despite absence of statutory rules, setting aside the CAT order denying such interest.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Leave Encashment Interest on delayed payment Retiral benefits Articles 14, 19, 21 of Constitution

Govt of NCT of Delhi v. Sunita

16 Sep 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:8182-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the candidate to produce the original degree certificate for verification before appointment, emphasizing mandatory document verification despite university delays.

administrative other original degree certificate document verification appointment Central Administrative Tribunal

Ravi Kumar Dogra v. Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd.

16 Sep 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:8156-DB

The Delhi High Court held that mere registration of an FIR without Magistrate's cognizance does not justify withholding retiral benefits under CCS Pension Rules and ordered release of pension with interest.

administrative petition_allowed Significant retiral benefits FIR registration CCS Pension Rules 1972 judicial proceedings

Anuradha Sharma & Ors. v. S.V.R. Chandra Sekhar & Anr.

16 Sep 2025 · Saurabh Banerjee · 2025:DHC:8322
Cites 3 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court dismissed the contempt petition for non-compliance of seniority and pay arrears directions, holding no wilful disobedience by the respondents and affirming the necessity of deliberate violation for contempt proceedings.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant wilful disobedience contempt of court seniority list Trained Graduate Teacher

Landmark Property Development Co Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 1

16 Sep 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar · 2025:DHC:8216-DB

The Delhi High Court directed income tax authorities to manually resolve advance tax credit issues arising from corporate demerger within a stipulated time, disposing of the writ petition with liberty to revive if unresolved.

tax petition_dismissed advance tax credit corporate demerger income tax manual refund

R v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

16 Sep 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:8164

The Delhi High Court upheld convictions of adoptive parents for sexual and physical abuse of a minor child, affirming the reliability of the victim's testimony and statutory presumptions under the POCSO Act despite defense challenges.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant POCSO Act child sexual assault juvenile justice statutory presumption

Chander Pal Singh v. State thru NCT of Delhi

16 Sep 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:8169

The Delhi High Court set aside the summary conviction of a police officer for giving false evidence due to procedural irregularities and denial of fair trial safeguards under Section 344 Cr.P.C.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 193 IPC Section 344 CrPC false evidence summary trial

Md. Shakir v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

16 Sep 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:8295
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed bail for an accused in a brutal sexual assault and murder case, holding that bail is not a matter of right in heinous offences with prima facie evidence and ongoing trial.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail sexual assault rape murder