Delhi High Court

59,406 judgments

Year:

Suresh Chandra & Ors. v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.

18 Sep 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:8299

The Delhi High Court granted interim protection against coercive action on a Vacation Notice to enable filing of an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal, without deciding on the merits.

administrative petition_allowed Vacation Notice Section 349 Delhi Municipal Corporation Act Municipal Corporation of Delhi Appellate Tribunal MCD

Ritu Bhardwaj v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

18 Sep 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:8300

The Delhi High Court granted interim protection against demolition to the petitioner to enable filing of an appeal before the Municipal Corporation's Appellate Tribunal, without adjudicating the merits.

administrative petition_allowed Demolition Notice Interim Protection Appellate Tribunal Municipal Corporation of Delhi Show Cause Notice

Union of India and Ors. v. Ex Sub Sardeep Kumar

18 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025 SCC OnLine Del 2355
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising during service are service-connected unless rebutted by the employer, and clarified the limited scope of certiorari jurisdiction over tribunal decisions.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Primary Hypertension Armed Forces Tribunal certiorari jurisdiction

Md Julfikar v. State NCT of Delhi

18 Sep 2025 · Vivek Chaudhary; Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:8331-DB

The court dismissed the Habeas Corpus petition seeking production of a missing major daughter who voluntarily appeared and stated she was married and did not wish to return to her parents.

constitutional petition_dismissed Habeas Corpus majority personal liberty missing person

Meharban v. State

18 Sep 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:8517
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 10 POCSO based on the credible testimony of a competent child victim, emphasizing that corroboration is not mandatory and delay in reporting does not vitiate the case.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant child witness competency POCSO Act Section 10 sexual assault of minor Section 29 POCSO presumption

Sumer Singh v. Union of India and Anr.

18 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:8327-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a candidate acquitted of criminal charges cannot be disqualified from CAPF recruitment under the 2012 Policy Guidelines, quashing the petitioner’s rejection for appointment.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Policy Guidelines 2012 acquittal criminal antecedents Central Armed Police Forces recruitment

DAUS PACKAGING INDIA PVT LTD v. AMIT SHARMA

18 Sep 2025 · C. HARI SHANKAR; OM PRAKASH SHUKLA · 2025:DHC:8321-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a first appeal filed with a 483-day delay due to insufficient explanation for condonation of delay, emphasizing strict adherence to limitation periods.

civil appeal_dismissed condonation of delay limitation Section 5 Limitation Act first appeal

Babu Lal Mitharwal v. Union of India

18 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:8325-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging police duty hours as infructuous after the petitioner retired, holding such petitions cannot be maintained post-superannuation unless filed as public interest litigation.

constitutional petition_dismissed Police Act 1861 Delhi Police Act 1978 Article 21 writ petition

State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) v. Arif & Anr

18 Sep 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:8472

The High Court upheld the acquittal of accused under Section 411 IPC, emphasizing the double presumption of innocence and the appellate court's limited scope to disturb acquittals based on discrepancies in recovery evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant appeal against acquittal Section 411 IPC recovery of stolen property double presumption of innocence

CT Naresh Kumar v. Union of India

18 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:8320-DB

The High Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn on the petitioner’s request and disposed of the pending application.

constitutional petition_dismissed writ petition withdrawal dismissal petition dismissed as withdrawn

Dr. Gomaram Bal Reddy v. Union of India & Ors.

18 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:8336-DB

The petitioner withdrew the writ petition after the grievance was resolved, leading to its disposal as withdrawn by the Delhi High Court.

constitutional petition_dismissed Procedural writ petition withdrawal disposal grievance assuaged

P Suresh Rao v. Niranjani Rao and Ors

18 Sep 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:8348

The High Court held that trial court’s observations in an interlocutory order do not prejudice final adjudication and dismissed the revision petition under Section 115 CPC.

civil petition_dismissed Section 115 CPC Order XII Rule 6 CPC Order VII Rule 11 CPC written statement

Sahil Rao v. Richa Vats and Anr.

18 Sep 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:8444

The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's interim maintenance order of ₹25,000 per month to the wife and minor child, affirming principles on income assessment and non-deduction of voluntary expenses.

family appeal_dismissed Significant interim maintenance Section 125 CrPC income assessment voluntary expenses deduction

Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax v. State

18 Sep 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:8338

The Delhi High Court held that the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 prevails over the Income Tax Act, 1961 in respect of seized assets alleged to be proceeds of crime, and dismissed the Income Tax Department's petition seeking release of seized funds for tax recovery prior to conclusion of PMLA proceedings.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 Section 226(4) IT Act Section 132 IT Act

Tauqir Alam v. Ashwani Kumar & Ors.

18 Sep 2025 · Mini Pushkarna

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition against unauthorized construction for lack of locus standi and misuse of court process for extortion, while upholding the adequacy of statutory action.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant unauthorized construction writ petition locus standi Article 226

Ram Adheen Das v. Election Commission of India

18 Sep 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:8400

The Delhi High Court held that the Election Commission cannot reduce the mandatory 30-day public notice period for political party registration before election announcement but may do so thereafter, directing conditional relief to the petitioner.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Representation of the People Act, 1951 Election Commission of India public notice period political party registration

Dhanuka Agritech Private Limited v. Iotechworld Avigation Private Limited & Ors.

18 Sep 2025 · Amit Bansal · 2025:DHC:8408

The Delhi High Court stayed the appointment of a statutory auditor by a company for violating the affirmative vote requirement under a Shareholders' Agreement binding the company despite non-incorporation in its Articles of Association.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Shareholders' Agreement Articles of Association Affirmative vote Statutory auditor appointment

Union of India v. Additional Director of Income Tax- Exemption Range-II, New Delhi

18 Sep 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar

The Delhi High Court held that the Union of India has locus standi to file tax appeals after stepping into the shoes of the disbanded Commonwealth Games Organising Committee and remanded the appeals to the ITAT for decision on merits.

tax appeal_allowed Significant locus standi Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Section 143(3) Income Tax Act Union of India

Saumya Chaurasia v. Assistant/Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors.

18 Sep 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar · 2025:DHC:8318-DB

The Delhi High Court held that subsistence allowance credited to a salary bank account is exempt from attachment under the Income Tax Act and directed timely disposal of the petitioner's appeal against recovery orders.

tax petition_allowed Significant subsistence allowance attachment Income Tax Act 1961 Section 226

Darshana Rani v. The Government of NCT of Delhi

18 Sep 2025 · Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2025:DHC:8420-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal seeking life insurance benefits under CMAWS for an advocate who died before policy activation, affirming that coverage requires prior verification and policy commencement.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Chief Minister Advocate Welfare Scheme life insurance claim insurance policy activation Bar Council of Delhi