Delhi High Court

29,725 judgments

Year:

Dr. Gomaram Bal Reddy v. Union of India & Ors.

18 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:8336-DB

The petitioner withdrew the writ petition after the grievance was resolved, leading to its disposal as withdrawn by the Delhi High Court.

constitutional petition_dismissed Procedural writ petition withdrawal disposal grievance assuaged

P Suresh Rao v. Niranjani Rao and Ors

18 Sep 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:8348

The High Court held that trial court’s observations in an interlocutory order do not prejudice final adjudication and dismissed the revision petition under Section 115 CPC.

civil petition_dismissed Section 115 CPC Order XII Rule 6 CPC Order VII Rule 11 CPC written statement

Sahil Rao v. Richa Vats and Anr.

18 Sep 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:8444

The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's interim maintenance order of ₹25,000 per month to the wife and minor child, affirming principles on income assessment and non-deduction of voluntary expenses.

family appeal_dismissed Significant interim maintenance Section 125 CrPC income assessment voluntary expenses deduction

Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax v. State

18 Sep 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:8338

The Delhi High Court held that the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 prevails over the Income Tax Act, 1961 in respect of seized assets alleged to be proceeds of crime, and dismissed the Income Tax Department's petition seeking release of seized funds for tax recovery prior to conclusion of PMLA proceedings.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 Section 226(4) IT Act Section 132 IT Act

Tauqir Alam v. Ashwani Kumar & Ors.

18 Sep 2025 · Mini Pushkarna

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition against unauthorized construction for lack of locus standi and misuse of court process for extortion, while upholding the adequacy of statutory action.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant unauthorized construction writ petition locus standi Article 226

Ram Adheen Das v. Election Commission of India

18 Sep 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:8400

The Delhi High Court held that the Election Commission cannot reduce the mandatory 30-day public notice period for political party registration before election announcement but may do so thereafter, directing conditional relief to the petitioner.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Representation of the People Act, 1951 Election Commission of India public notice period political party registration

Dhanuka Agritech Private Limited v. Iotechworld Avigation Private Limited & Ors.

18 Sep 2025 · Amit Bansal · 2025:DHC:8408

The Delhi High Court stayed the appointment of a statutory auditor by a company for violating the affirmative vote requirement under a Shareholders' Agreement binding the company despite non-incorporation in its Articles of Association.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Shareholders' Agreement Articles of Association Affirmative vote Statutory auditor appointment

Union of India v. Additional Director of Income Tax- Exemption Range-II, New Delhi

18 Sep 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar

The Delhi High Court held that the Union of India has locus standi to file tax appeals after stepping into the shoes of the disbanded Commonwealth Games Organising Committee and remanded the appeals to the ITAT for decision on merits.

tax appeal_allowed Significant locus standi Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Section 143(3) Income Tax Act Union of India

Saumya Chaurasia v. Assistant/Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors.

18 Sep 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar · 2025:DHC:8318-DB

The Delhi High Court held that subsistence allowance credited to a salary bank account is exempt from attachment under the Income Tax Act and directed timely disposal of the petitioner's appeal against recovery orders.

tax petition_allowed Significant subsistence allowance attachment Income Tax Act 1961 Section 226

Darshana Rani v. The Government of NCT of Delhi

18 Sep 2025 · Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2025:DHC:8420-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal seeking life insurance benefits under CMAWS for an advocate who died before policy activation, affirming that coverage requires prior verification and policy commencement.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Chief Minister Advocate Welfare Scheme life insurance claim insurance policy activation Bar Council of Delhi

Engineering Projects (India) Limited & Ors. v. MSA Global LLC (Oman)

18 Sep 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:8440

Delhi High Court granted interim injunction restraining defendant from continuing vexatious arbitration-related contempt proceedings in Singapore, emphasizing judicial intervention where arbitration is prima facie oppressive.

civil appeal_allowed Significant interim injunction anti-arbitration injunction vexatious arbitration non-disclosure by arbitrator

Commissioner of Customs Export v. Ravindra Kumar

18 Sep 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:8374-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld a Rs. 10 lakh penalty under Section 114 of the Customs Act on a freight forwarder involved in illegal export of Red Sanders but dismissed the Revenue's appeal for an additional penalty under Section 114AA due to lack of knowledge of misdeclaration in documents filed under the Act.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Customs Act 1962 Section 114 penalty Section 114AA penalty Red Sanders export

Mayank Gupta v. Commissioner of Custom (Export)

18 Sep 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:8372-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld a Rs. 10 lakh penalty on the appellant for filing airway bills facilitating illegal export of Red Sanders, clarifying that penalty under Section 114 applies without intent, while Section 114AA requires knowledge of false documents filed under the Customs Act.

customs appeal_dismissed Significant Customs Act, 1962 Section 114 penalty Section 114AA penalty Red Sanders export

Kushal Ram v. Commissioner of Customs & Anr.

18 Sep 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:8381-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging confiscation of goods by customs for non-declaration, directing the appeal to be heard on merits with personal hearing granted.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Customs Act, 1962 confiscation show cause notice personal hearing

K Babu alias Yusuf v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

18 Sep 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:8446

Interim bail on medical grounds was denied where the accused's condition was stable, surgery elective, and bail misused by traveling without undergoing surgery.

criminal petition_dismissed interim bail medical grounds elective surgery misuse of bail

State (NCT) of Delhi v. Vikas Jain

18 Sep 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:8445
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the discharge of an accused in a rape case where the prosecutrix was already married, holding that a false promise of marriage cannot vitiate consent absent genuine deception at inception.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant framing of charge Section 376 IPC false promise of marriage prima facie case

M/S MOHAN FOOTCARE PVT. LTD v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF CGST

18 Sep 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:8377-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the GST department to re-credit Input Tax Credit adjusted against erroneous refunds despite technical portal limitations, allowing the writ petition.

tax petition_allowed Significant Input Tax Credit GST refund PMT-03 erroneous refund

Findoc Ventures Private Limited v. GST Officer Ward 101 Zone 9 Delhi & Ors.

18 Sep 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:8385-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file an appeal against GST adjudication orders despite pending Supreme Court challenges to the validity of related notifications, emphasizing procedural compliance and leaving the question of validity open.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 168A Central GST Act GST Council recommendation Show Cause Notice Appeal under Section 107

Manjeet Singh Jassal and Anr. v. Atma Singh and Ors.

18 Sep 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:8459-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a plaint seeking partition and related reliefs cannot be summarily rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC merely on maintainability objections under the Benami Act without evidence.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC rejection of plaint cause of action Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988

Union of India and Anr. v. Neeta Mishra

18 Sep 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:8454-DB

The High Court set aside the Tribunal’s order directing supply of ACRs without considering limitation, remanding the matter for fresh consideration of limitation before deciding merits.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant limitation Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 Annual Confidential Reports Original Application