Delhi High Court

29,725 judgments

Year:

Chintu Kumar & Ors. v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

19 Sep 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:8324

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and divorce between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 498A IPC Section 406 IPC Section 34 IPC Section 482 CrPC

Naqibullah Rodaie v. Air Customs, IGI Airport, New Delhi

19 Sep 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:8341

Bail was refused to an accused in a commercial heroin trafficking case under Section 37 NDPS Act due to failure to satisfy stringent twin conditions and high risk of absconding.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail NDPS Act Section 37 NDPS commercial quantity

CBI v. V K Singh & Anr

19 Sep 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:8313
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that in cases involving official secrets, the accused is entitled to inspect sensitive documents but not necessarily to receive hard copies, balancing fair trial rights with State security.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Official Secrets Act, 1923 Right to fair trial Section 207 CrPC Inspection of documents

Chhotey Lal v. The State

19 Sep 2025 · Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:8305

The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of rape under Section 376 IPC, holding that consent obtained on a false promise of marriage is not vitiated consent unless the promise was made without any intention to marry from the outset.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant consent false promise of marriage Section 376 IPC Section 90 IPC

JAIN SHIKANJI PRIVATE LIMITED v. SATISH KUMAR JAIN

18 Sep 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:8248-DB

The Delhi High Court corrected typographical errors in its judgment and emphasized that the appellant violated interim orders by continuing to use the old corporate name in transactions until compelled to change it after the respondent's complaint.

civil other interim orders undertakings trademark use corporate name change

Srishti Rustagi v. Securities and Exchange Board of India

18 Sep 2025 · Devender Kumar Upadhyay; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2025:DHC:8242-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld SEBI's refusal to disclose details of an ongoing investigation under Section 8(1)(h) of the RTI Act, dismissing the appellant's plea for further information and emphasizing confidentiality in regulatory probes.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Right to Information Act, 2005 Section 8(1)(h) SEBI investigation confidentiality

Soumya Bhattacharya v. Sudhir Kumar Thakur & Ors.

18 Sep 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:8289

The Delhi High Court held that a brother managing the estate and maintenance of the deceased's dependents has locus to file a consumer complaint under the Consumer Protection Act, dismissing the maintainability challenge.

consumer_protection petition_dismissed Significant locus standi consumer complaint legal heir representative

Umesh @ Kala v. State

18 Sep 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:8285
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed bail under MCOCA to an accused involved in organized crime, holding that delay in trial alone does not justify bail when the accused’s role and risk to society are significant.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant MCOCA bail organized crime syndicate Section 21(4) MCOCA

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. M/S Valley Iron & Steel Co. Ltd.

18 Sep 2025 · Jasmeet Singh
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award directing insurer United India Insurance to pay ₹33.26 crores to insured Valley Iron & Steel, holding that the consent letter was signed under economic duress and that arbitrable disputes survived despite prior settlement.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 challenge Insurance claim settlement Consent letter

Shadab @ Salman v. State (NCT of Delhi)

18 Sep 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:8297

The High Court acquitted the appellant in a robbery case due to failure of the prosecution to establish his identity beyond reasonable doubt, emphasizing the importance of judicial TIP and examination of public witnesses.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant identification parade judicial TIP benefit of doubt non-examination of public witnesses

Suresh Chandra & Ors. v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.

18 Sep 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:8299

The Delhi High Court granted interim protection against coercive action on a Vacation Notice to enable filing of an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal, without deciding on the merits.

administrative petition_allowed Vacation Notice Section 349 Delhi Municipal Corporation Act Municipal Corporation of Delhi Appellate Tribunal MCD

Ritu Bhardwaj v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

18 Sep 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:8300

The Delhi High Court granted interim protection against demolition to the petitioner to enable filing of an appeal before the Municipal Corporation's Appellate Tribunal, without adjudicating the merits.

administrative petition_allowed Demolition Notice Interim Protection Appellate Tribunal Municipal Corporation of Delhi Show Cause Notice

Union of India and Ors. v. Ex Sub Sardeep Kumar

18 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025 SCC OnLine Del 2355
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising during service are service-connected unless rebutted by the employer, and clarified the limited scope of certiorari jurisdiction over tribunal decisions.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Primary Hypertension Armed Forces Tribunal certiorari jurisdiction

Md Julfikar v. State NCT of Delhi

18 Sep 2025 · Vivek Chaudhary; Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:8331-DB

The court dismissed the Habeas Corpus petition seeking production of a missing major daughter who voluntarily appeared and stated she was married and did not wish to return to her parents.

constitutional petition_dismissed Habeas Corpus majority personal liberty missing person

Meharban v. State

18 Sep 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:8517
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 10 POCSO based on the credible testimony of a competent child victim, emphasizing that corroboration is not mandatory and delay in reporting does not vitiate the case.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant child witness competency POCSO Act Section 10 sexual assault of minor Section 29 POCSO presumption

Sumer Singh v. Union of India and Anr.

18 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:8327-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a candidate acquitted of criminal charges cannot be disqualified from CAPF recruitment under the 2012 Policy Guidelines, quashing the petitioner’s rejection for appointment.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Policy Guidelines 2012 acquittal criminal antecedents Central Armed Police Forces recruitment

DAUS PACKAGING INDIA PVT LTD v. AMIT SHARMA

18 Sep 2025 · C. HARI SHANKAR; OM PRAKASH SHUKLA · 2025:DHC:8321-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a first appeal filed with a 483-day delay due to insufficient explanation for condonation of delay, emphasizing strict adherence to limitation periods.

civil appeal_dismissed condonation of delay limitation Section 5 Limitation Act first appeal

Babu Lal Mitharwal v. Union of India

18 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:8325-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging police duty hours as infructuous after the petitioner retired, holding such petitions cannot be maintained post-superannuation unless filed as public interest litigation.

constitutional petition_dismissed Police Act 1861 Delhi Police Act 1978 Article 21 writ petition

State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) v. Arif & Anr

18 Sep 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:8472

The High Court upheld the acquittal of accused under Section 411 IPC, emphasizing the double presumption of innocence and the appellate court's limited scope to disturb acquittals based on discrepancies in recovery evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant appeal against acquittal Section 411 IPC recovery of stolen property double presumption of innocence

CT Naresh Kumar v. Union of India

18 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:8320-DB

The High Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn on the petitioner’s request and disposed of the pending application.

constitutional petition_dismissed writ petition withdrawal dismissal petition dismissed as withdrawn