Delhi High Court

59,406 judgments

Year:

Atul Tanwar & Anr. v. Delhi Cantonment Board

19 Sep 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:8391

The Delhi High Court allowed petitioners to file a regularization application for their property and restrained demolition during its consideration, emphasizing procedural fairness under the Cantonment Act.

administrative other regularization application demolition notice Cantonment Act 2006 Section 248

Pooja Tokas v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

19 Sep 2025 · Mini Pushkarna

The Delhi High Court held that interim protection against demolition cannot be misused to continue unauthorized construction and directed prompt action by municipal and police authorities.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant unauthorized construction interim protection status quo order demolition order

Krishna Devi and Ors. v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors.

19 Sep 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2017 SCC OnLine Del 11050

The Delhi High Court held that non-neighbor petitioners lack locus standi to challenge municipal action against unauthorized construction and upheld the MCD's revocation of building plans obtained by misrepresentation.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant locus standi unauthorized construction Sanctioned Building Plans Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957

Ragib Khan v. Commissioner MCD and Ors.

19 Sep 2025 · Mini Pushkarna

Delhi High Court held that only immediate neighbors or persons personally affected have locus standi to challenge unauthorized construction, and dismissed petitions where municipal authorities had already taken action.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant locus standi unauthorized construction municipal corporation writ petition

Shruti Garg v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors.

19 Sep 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:8399

The Delhi High Court upheld MCD's sealing of unauthorized commercial activity in property No. 12/20 and directed consideration of de-sealing upon compliance with building laws and fire safety norms.

administrative petition_dismissed unauthorized construction sealing order Municipal Corporation of Delhi Master Plan for Delhi 2021

Bhagat Ram v. State NCT of Delhi

19 Sep 2025 · Vivek Chaudhary; Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:8414-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court dismissed a Habeas Corpus petition seeking production of a wife who voluntarily left her husband and is not under unlawful detention.

constitutional petition_dismissed Habeas Corpus Article 226 voluntary absence unlawful detention

Siam Stock Holdings Limited v. Assistant/ Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle International Taxation 3(1)(2) & Ors.

19 Sep 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar · 2025:DHC:8394-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside ex-parte income tax assessment and penalty orders due to improper service of notices, remanding the matter for fresh proceedings after proper notice.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 natural justice service of notice ex-parte assessment

Avtar Singh v. Union of India and Ors

19 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:8402-DB

The High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to challenge an order passed on appeal during the petition's pendency.

constitutional petition_allowed writ petition withdrawal of petition liberty to challenge appeal order

Shiva Enterprises v. Union of India & Ors.

19 Sep 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:8386-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a GST adjudication order and upheld the procedure of granting appellate remedy pending the Supreme Court's decision on the validity of related notifications.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Show Cause Notice Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 168A Notification validity

M/S S K Overseas v. Superintendent Range 20 Central GST Division

19 Sep 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:8383-DB

The Delhi High Court directed investigation into a GST registration cancellation case involving a fictitious firm and emphasized the need for verification of client identity and documents in GST writ petitions.

administrative other Significant GST registration cancellation fictitious firms forgery fabrication

BNP Paribas Suisse SA v. Ashok Kumar Goel & Ors.

19 Sep 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:8496

The Delhi High Court held that a foreign decree from a reciprocating territory can be simultaneously executed in India and the cause country under Section 44A CPC, rejecting objections based on pendency of foreign proceedings and decree finality.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 44A CPC foreign decree execution simultaneous execution reciprocating territory

Court on its Own Motion v. Union of India & Ors.

19 Sep 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2025:DHC:8465-DB

The Delhi High Court directed coordinated inspections, data reconciliation, and upgradation of industrial effluent treatment infrastructure under judicial supervision to prevent water pollution and water-logging.

administrative other Significant Effluent Treatment Plant Common Effluent Treatment Plant Delhi Pollution Control Committee Industrial pollution

Neeta Bhardwaj & Ors. v. Kamlesh Sharma

19 Sep 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2025:DHC:8475

The Delhi High Court upheld the appointment of an Administrator for Kalkaji Mandir's redevelopment amid baaridars' disputes, with the Supreme Court dismissing challenges but staying redevelopment pending resolution.

administrative other Significant Kalkaji Mandir Administrator appointment Temple redevelopment Baaridars disputes

Union of India v. EX 770906 SGT PK Rajesh

19 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:8418-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising post-entry are service-related unless rebutted by clear reasons.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Primary Hypertension Armed Forces Tribunal Release Medical Board

Manoj Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.

19 Sep 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:8461-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the penalty of zero marks for a candidate who violated explicit examination instructions by writing his own name in the answer sheet, emphasizing strict adherence to rules to maintain fairness.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant examination instructions answer sheet evaluation personal identity disclosure competitive examination

Ashwani Kumar Sarpal v. High Court of Delhi

19 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:8425-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw a writ petition deemed infructuous and dismissed the petition accordingly.

constitutional appeal_dismissed writ petition withdrawal infructuous dismissal

Rupinder Singh Sahni v. Manmeet Singh Sahni

19 Sep 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:8529

The Delhi High Court held that civil courts have jurisdiction over inheritance and title disputes despite pending NCLT proceedings and granted interim injunctions directing deposit of rental income to protect heirs' interests.

civil appeal_allowed Significant interim injunction civil court jurisdiction Companies Act 2013 Section 430

Surendra v. Union of India & Ors.

19 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:8319-DB

The Delhi High Court directed re-measurement of the petitioner’s height by the Appellate Authority due to an impractical appeal process and marginal shortfall in physical standards in CAPF recruitment.

administrative petition_allowed Significant recruitment physical standard test height requirement appellate authority

M/S INSPIRE EXIM PVT. LTD. & ANR. v. M/S JAIN BROTHERS SANITATION PVT. LTD. & ANR.

19 Sep 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:8335

The High Court allowed the petitioners one final opportunity to conclude cross-examination previously closed by the trial court, subject to payment of costs and strict time limits, to ensure fair trial and expeditious disposal.

civil appeal_allowed cross-examination right to cross-examine closure of evidence trial procedure

Ashok Kumar v. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Limited

19 Sep 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:8286-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that objections under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act filed beyond the strict limitation period, even after excluding time spent in a court without jurisdiction under Section 14 of the Limitation Act, are barred and cannot be condoned.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Limitation Act, 1963 Section 14