Delhi High Court
29,725 judgments
BNP Paribas Suisse SA v. Ashok Kumar Goel & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a foreign decree from a reciprocating territory can be simultaneously executed in India and the cause country under Section 44A CPC, rejecting objections based on pendency of foreign proceedings and decree finality.
Court on its Own Motion v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed coordinated inspections, data reconciliation, and upgradation of industrial effluent treatment infrastructure under judicial supervision to prevent water pollution and water-logging.
Neeta Bhardwaj & Ors. v. Kamlesh Sharma
The Delhi High Court upheld the appointment of an Administrator for Kalkaji Mandir's redevelopment amid baaridars' disputes, with the Supreme Court dismissing challenges but staying redevelopment pending resolution.
Union of India v. EX 770906 SGT PK Rajesh
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising post-entry are service-related unless rebutted by clear reasons.
Manoj Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the penalty of zero marks for a candidate who violated explicit examination instructions by writing his own name in the answer sheet, emphasizing strict adherence to rules to maintain fairness.
Ashwani Kumar Sarpal v. High Court of Delhi
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw a writ petition deemed infructuous and dismissed the petition accordingly.
Rupinder Singh Sahni v. Manmeet Singh Sahni
The Delhi High Court held that civil courts have jurisdiction over inheritance and title disputes despite pending NCLT proceedings and granted interim injunctions directing deposit of rental income to protect heirs' interests.
Surendra v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed re-measurement of the petitioner’s height by the Appellate Authority due to an impractical appeal process and marginal shortfall in physical standards in CAPF recruitment.
M/S INSPIRE EXIM PVT. LTD. & ANR. v. M/S JAIN BROTHERS SANITATION PVT. LTD. & ANR.
The High Court allowed the petitioners one final opportunity to conclude cross-examination previously closed by the trial court, subject to payment of costs and strict time limits, to ensure fair trial and expeditious disposal.
Ashok Kumar v. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Limited
The Delhi High Court held that objections under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act filed beyond the strict limitation period, even after excluding time spent in a court without jurisdiction under Section 14 of the Limitation Act, are barred and cannot be condoned.
M/S SSM Engineers Pvt Ltd v. State (GNCT) of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition upholding conviction under Section 138 NI Act, holding that the petitioners failed to rebut statutory presumptions of cheque issuance against a legally enforceable debt.
Salman Sayeed Siddiqui v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of the accused in a sophisticated cyber fraud case, holding that substantial incriminating evidence and risk of tampering justified denial of bail.
Vishal Jaiswal v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to Vishal Jaiswal in an NDPS case, holding that CDRs and co-accused disclosures alone cannot deny bail and emphasizing cooperation with investigation and compliance with conditions.
Union of India & Ors. v. Brijesh Singh through Lrs Vishal Saxena
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's quashing of recovery of alleged shortage amount from a retired railway employee's retiral benefits due to lack of evidence and proper inquiry.
XXXXX v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of an uncle for aggravated penetrative sexual assault on his minor nephew, relying on credible child testimony, DNA evidence, and independent witness identification under the POCSO Act.
Nitesh Kumar & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a voluntary and amicable settlement between estranged spouses, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Hoshiyar Singh & Ors. v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Shanti Devi v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under dowry harassment and related offences based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Sanjay Kumar v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 509, 506, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Dharmender & Ors. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on a voluntary and amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.