Ashok Verma v. Delhi Cantonment Board

Delhi High Court · 19 Sep 2025 · 2025:DHC:8390
Mini Pushkarna
W.P.(C) 14588/2025
2025:DHC:8390
administrative petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file a regularization application against demolition proceedings and directed the Cantonment Board to consider it with a personal hearing, restraining coercive action during pendency.

Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 19th September, 2025
W.P.(C) 14588/2025 & CM APPL. 59843/2025, CM APPL.
59844/2025 ASHOK VERMA .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Abhinav Sharma, Mr. Manish Tanwar, Advocates (M:9953993355)
VERSUS
DELHI CANTONMENT BOARD .....Respondent
Through: Mr. Ankur Mishra, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA MINI PUSHKARNA, J (ORAL):
JUDGMENT

1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking quashing of the order dated 29th July, 2025 passed by the General Officer Commanding-in-Chief, Western Command, Chandigarh, in Appeal No. 01/2024, titled as “Shri Ashok Verma Versus Delhi Cantonment Board.”

2. There is further prayer for setting aside the Demolition Notice dated 03rd September, 2025 issued by the Chief Executive Officer, Delhi Cantonment Board, with respect to the property of the petitioner, i.e. property bearing no. CB-97, Village Naraina, Delhi Cantt.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the appeal of the petitioner herein has been dismissed solely on the ground that the petitioner made reference to the compounding provisions as contained in Section 248 of the Cantonment Act, 2006.

4. After some hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the petitioner, the petitioner shall approach the respondent for filing an application for regularization.

5. Issue notice. Notice is accepted by learned counsel for the Delhi Cantonment Board (“DCB”), who submits that in case any application for regularization is filed by the petitioner, appropriate orders shall be passed therein.

6. Accordingly, having heard learned counsels for the parties, it is directed as follows:

I. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to file an application for regularization of the construction in the property in question, within a period of four weeks, from today.

II. Upon the petitioner filing the regularization application, the same shall be considered by the respondent-DCB, in accordance with law.

III. At the time of considering the regularization application of the petitioner, the petitioner shall be granted opportunity of personal hearing.

IV. In case any directions are issued by the DCB during the hearing of the application for regularization, the said directions shall be duly complied by the petitioner.

V. In case the petitioner files the regularization application within a period of four weeks from today, no coercive action shall be taken against the property of the petitioner, during the pendency of the regularization application.

VI. In case the petitioner is aggrieved by any orders passed by the respondent-DCB in the regularization application, the petitioner shall have the liberty to seek his remedies, in accordance with law.

7. With the aforesaid directions, the present petition, along with pending applications, is accordingly disposed of. MINI PUSHKARNA, J SEPTEMBER 19, 2025