Anil Parihar v. Union of India

Delhi High Court · 22 Sep 2025 · 2025:DHC:8477-DB
C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla
W.P.(C) 8852/2023
2025:DHC:8477-DB
administrative appeal_dismissed

AI Summary

The High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition as it became infructuous following the passing of a punishment order.

Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 8852/2023 & CM APPL. 33465/2023
ANIL PARIHAR .....Petitioner
Through: Mr Himanshu Gautam and Ms. Niharika Punn, Advs.
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents
Through: Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, CGSC
WITH
Ms. Mansi Singh, Ms. Monalisa Padan and Mr. Sanyam Bhardwaj, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA
ORDER (ORAL)
22.09.2025 C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
JUDGMENT

1. Mr. Himanshu Gautam, learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this writ petition as he submits that a punishment order has been passed and the petition has become infructuous.

2. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending application stands disposed of.

C. HARI SHANKAR, J

OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J SEPTEMBER 22, 2025