Delhi High Court
36,659 judgments
Garima Gupta v. State
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner accused of economic offences, considering settlements with investors, compliance with bail conditions, and the moratorium under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, emphasizing bail as the rule and jail the exception.
Delhi Development Authority v. Arra Raju Narsimha
The Delhi High Court dismissed appeals challenging an interim status quo order in pending writ petitions, emphasizing restraint in interfering with interlocutory orders and directing expeditious hearing of the main matters.
Bijender @ Binder v. The State
The High Court remanded the bail rejection order back to the trial court for reconsideration, emphasizing the necessity of a reasoned order addressing all points raised by the accused at the bail hearing.
Pawan Kumar Chhabra v. M/S OM Enterprises & Ors.
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from loan agreements containing a valid arbitration clause after the respondents failed to respond to the arbitration notice.
HSPS Textiles Pvt. Ltd. v. Sanjeev Kumar Goel & Anr.
The High Court dismissed the appeal against the dismissal of a Section 34 petition as barred by limitation, holding that courts cannot examine the merits of an arbitral award if the challenge is time-barred.
ATIR v. State of NCT Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed multiple FIRs registered for the same incident of arson within a single compound, holding that only one FIR can be registered for the same transaction to prevent abuse of investigation powers.
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited v. Mohanjit Singh Legal Heirs
The Delhi High Court dismissed an application opposing release of security after final dismissal of HPCL's appeal, holding that pending title disputes do not affect execution of decree or release of security.
Vandana Dua v. State
The Delhi High Court discharged the petitioner at the charge framing stage under Section 227 Cr.P.C, holding that the material was insufficient to show grave suspicion against her for abetment of rape.
Dharam Pal Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-reasoned order denying MACP benefit and directed reconsideration with reasons, affirming the mandatory requirement of reasoned quasi-judicial decisions.
Rajesh Kumar v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition as not pressed after the petitioner’s wife expressed her wish to reside with her maternal grandmother and the petitioner chose not to pursue the petition.
TATA SONS PRIVATE LIMITED v. SUNIL KESHAVJI TATARIA & ANR.
The Delhi High Court decreed a trademark infringement suit in terms of a valid mediated settlement and allowed refund of entire court fees under Section 16A of the Court Fees Act.
Kuldeep v. State (Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail for the accused in a serious trafficking and sexual exploitation case involving a minor, emphasizing the gravity of offences and prima facie evidence against the accused.
Kuldeep v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail for the petitioner accused of forcing a minor into prostitution, holding that material indicated his knowledge and involvement, and that bail was not warranted given the severity of offences and risk of tampering with evidence.
MAGMA HDI GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD v. MEENA KUMARI @ MEENU & ORS
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company's appeal and upheld the motor accident claim award granting compensation for loss of love and affection to the deceased's children and parents, applying Supreme Court precedents on consortium.
MR KAMAL KHOSLA & ORS. v. MR VIDYA SAGAR SAREEN & ORS.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate payment disputes arising from a Share Purchase Agreement due to respondents' failure to nominate an arbitrator.
Indian Ex Borderman Movement v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking extension of enhanced retirement age benefits to personnel who had crossed 60 years before the cut-off date, affirming the applicability of the Dev Sharma judgment only prospectively as clarified in Bharat Singh.
Dharamveer Yadav v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-reasoned order denying MACP benefit and directed reconsideration with proper reasons for grant of 2nd financial upgradation from June 2008.
Deepak Dua v. State & Anr.
The High Court discharged the accused at the charge framing stage, holding that the prosecutrix's allegations were afterthoughts lacking grave suspicion, and the Sessions Court failed to apply judicial mind in framing charges.
Sterlite Techologies Limited v. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited
The Delhi High Court held that disputes regarding trench depth penalties under a BSNL contract are prima facie arbitrable and appointed an arbitrator, emphasizing limited court intervention under Section 11(6A) of the Arbitration Act.
Henna Industries Pvt. Ltd v. RPS Infrastructure Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Section 9 petition for lack of territorial jurisdiction, holding that the Court at the stipulated arbitration venue alone has jurisdiction absent mutual agreement to change venue.