Delhi High Court
36,653 judgments
Asian Hotels (North) Ltd. v. Swatika Jain & Madonna’s
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes arising from revocation of license agreements for shops in Hotel Grand Hyatt under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Tushar Mittal v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The High Court upheld the Sessions Court order directing framing of charges for sexual harassment, emphasizing the limited scope of inquiry at the charge framing stage and sparing use of inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
56c4fae4000face3106982f70c0ff28f7222783c4db157f0724292a24152ec92
Bail applications of accused charged with robbery by impersonation under Section 395 IPC were dismissed due to the serious nature of offences and strong prosecution evidence including recovery of stolen property.
Muddasir Nazir Bhat v. The State
Bail applications of accused involved in dacoity by impersonating police officers were dismissed due to seriousness of offence and risk of evidence tampering.
Ursapharm India Private Limited v. Employees State Insurance Corporation
The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of a subsidiary company's tender bid for failing to meet turnover criteria on its own, refusing to consider the parent company's turnover in absence of a joint venture or binding arrangement.
Tushar Mittal v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The High Court upheld the Sessions Court order setting aside the discharge of the accused and directed framing of charges for sexual harassment offences, affirming the limited scope of judicial scrutiny at the charge framing stage.
State of West Bengal v. Reena Joshi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing the State of West Bengal to reconsider an IAS officer's inter-cadre transfer request, holding that refusal on vague grounds without relevant material is impermissible.
ASIAN HOTELS (NORTH) LTD. v. KUMAR GALLERY PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition for appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act as the parties resolved their dispute with the respondent agreeing to vacate the premises.
Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) Delhi v. National Safai Karamcharis Finance and Development Corporation
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's order granting income tax exemption under Section 10(26B) to a government-owned corporation working exclusively for the benefit of Scheduled Caste communities.
EX HC GD SANTRAJ NO.930120101 v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the ITBP authorities to dispose of the petitioner's pending revision petition against his removal from service within six weeks, emphasizing timely administrative action without deciding on the merits.
Amrendra Kumar & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the BSF to dispose of the petitioners' representation challenging the merger of Constable (Kahar) post with Constable (Kitchen Services) by a reasoned order within eight weeks, leaving the merits open for future adjudication.
Dr Kaushal Kant Mishra v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the legality of exclusive COVID-19 treatment facilities for government officers during the pandemic, rejecting claims of constitutional violations and lack of authority.
Rupa Singh v. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of a PIL concerning misleading ORS products by directing the competent authority to treat the petition as a representation and decide it expeditiously after hearing all stakeholders.
Kamlesh Gupta v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a timely application for release of seized jewellery under Section 132B of the Income Tax Act must be acted upon within 120 days, and failure of officers to act cannot prejudice the petitioner’s right to release upon furnishing security and undertaking.
Sujit Kumar v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of the accused in a dowry death case, holding that prima facie evidence of cruelty and dowry demand justified denial of bail at the investigation stage.
Sujeet Kumar v. State Through Delhi Administration
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of the husband accused under Sections 304B and 498A IPC in a dowry death case, holding that no ground for bail was made out at the investigation stage.
CJ DARCL LOGISTICS LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER
The Delhi High Court held that creditors cannot bypass the insolvency liquidation process to recover dues from a PSU in liquidation and that revival of a PSU is a government policy matter beyond the writ court's scope.
Kela Devi v. Umed Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court decreed a civil suit based on a settlement agreement, allowing modification of deadlines for compliance due to COVID-19 related difficulties.
Rajesh Rai v. Ajay Kumar & Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions as withdrawn after the petitioners complied with the court's orders, rendering the petitions infructuous.
GD Shiv Lal v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed respondents to consider government employees' claims for second financial upgradation under the MACP Scheme in line with Supreme Court precedents, pending final adjudication by the Apex Court.