Rajesh Kumar v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors.

Delhi High Court · 31 Aug 2021 · 2021:DHC:4490-DB
Siddharth Mridul; Anup Jairam Bhambhani
W.P.(CRL)1627/2021
2021:DHC:4490-DB
other other

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition as not pressed after the petitioner’s wife expressed her wish to reside with her maternal grandmother and the petitioner chose not to pursue the petition.

Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.
(CRL)1627/2021 SH.RAJESH KUMAR
Through
VERSUS
THE STATE
(NCT OF DELHI)& ORS.
Through Petitioner Mr.Harish Kumar,Advocate.
Respondents Mr.Sanjay Lau, Standing Counsel for the State along with Inspector
Gulshan Nagpal and ASI Mahavir Singh,P.S. Mundka,Delhi.
CORAM"
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI
31.08.2021 In view of the circumstance that Smt. Beenu, wife of Mr.Rajesh
Kumar, the petitioner herein, has appeared before this court in-person and stated that she wishes to reside with her maternal grandmotherSmt.
Nathiwife ofSh.Harchan,respondentNo.4herein,atthe address F-188, 12-Gaj, Village Bakarwala,P.S. Mundaka,New Delhi,learned counsel appearing onbehalfofthe petitioner,oninstructionsfromthelatter,does notpress this writpetition.
This writpetitionis accordingly disposedofasnotpressed.
[DDHARTH MRIDUL,J AUGUST 31,2021/dn/j ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI,J
Click here rhprk corrieendum,, i:Lcmy-
W.P.(CRL.)1627/2021
Page1 of1 2021:DHC:4490-DB
JUDGMENT