Delhi High Court
96,834 judgments
Dr Kaushal Kant Mishra v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the legality of exclusive COVID-19 treatment facilities for government officers during the pandemic, rejecting claims of constitutional violations and lack of authority.
Rupa Singh v. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of a PIL concerning misleading ORS products by directing the competent authority to treat the petition as a representation and decide it expeditiously after hearing all stakeholders.
Kamlesh Gupta v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a timely application for release of seized jewellery under Section 132B of the Income Tax Act must be acted upon within 120 days, and failure of officers to act cannot prejudice the petitioner’s right to release upon furnishing security and undertaking.
Sujeet Kumar v. State Through Delhi Administration
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of the husband accused under Sections 304B and 498A IPC in a dowry death case, holding that no ground for bail was made out at the investigation stage.
CJ DARCL LOGISTICS LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER
The Delhi High Court held that creditors cannot bypass the insolvency liquidation process to recover dues from a PSU in liquidation and that revival of a PSU is a government policy matter beyond the writ court's scope.
Kela Devi v. Umed Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court decreed a civil suit based on a settlement agreement, allowing modification of deadlines for compliance due to COVID-19 related difficulties.
Rajesh Rai v. Ajay Kumar & Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions as withdrawn after the petitioners complied with the court's orders, rendering the petitions infructuous.
GD Shiv Lal v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed respondents to consider government employees' claims for second financial upgradation under the MACP Scheme in line with Supreme Court precedents, pending final adjudication by the Apex Court.
Geeta Sinha v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition for lack of territorial jurisdiction as the impugned order was passed by an authority outside Delhi and no part of the cause of action arose there.
Rohini Educational Society and Anr v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation and Ors
The Delhi High Court quashed property tax demand notices due to incorrect computation and lack of personal hearing, remanding the matter for fresh assessment.
Pravesh Dhawan & Ors. v. Jatin Dhawan
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the trial court's order rejecting the defendants' application to dismiss a suit based on an unregistered family settlement, holding the suit maintainable and emphasizing the limited scope of Order 7 Rule 11 CPC.
Dr. Arjun Saili v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that respondents cannot retain a candidate's original documents beyond course completion without express contractual authority and must recover dues through legal proceedings.
Pawan Puri v. The State
The Delhi High Court held that legal heirs of a deceased Executor are entitled to Letters of Administration with the Will annexed after Probate has been granted but before full estate administration, allowing conversion of Probate into Letters of Administration without fresh proceedings.
M/S RAJIV GANDHI CANCER INSTITUTE AND RESEARCH CENTRE v. REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, DELHI (NORTH)
The Delhi High Court held that orders imposing interest under Section 7Q and damages under Section 14B arising from common proceedings should be treated as composite and appealable together before the Tribunal, directing the petitioner to challenge the interest demand before the Tribunal rather than by writ petition.
Pramod Gupta & Anr. v. Cyber Media Research and Services Ltd & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the respondents must finalize the Qualified IPO strictly as per Clause 8.1.2 of the Shareholders' Agreement, leaving other disputes to arbitration and disposing of the petition accordingly.
Gaurav Enterprises v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that orders under Sections 7Q and 14B of the EPF Act arising from common proceedings are composite and appealable before the CGIT, allowing the writ petition to stay coercive action on the interest demand.
Varun Moudgil & Ors. v. Neena Khatry
The Delhi High Court upheld the execution of a consent decree enforcing a Settlement Agreement with strict timelines, rejecting the appellants' belated extension plea and confirming that the agreement itself operated as a power of attorney for sale of properties.
Delhi Parshashan Vikas Vibhag Industrial Employees Union v. Department of Social Welfare & Ors.
Delhi High Court held that contractual Data Entry Operators have no absolute right to prevent change of contractor under mandatory government procurement rules, provided existing employees are retained on current terms pending regularization claims.
Delhi Parshashan Vikas Vibhag Industrial Employees Union v. Department of Social Welfare & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Government's right to procure Data Entry Operator services through the GeM portal while directing retention of existing contractual employees and maintenance of their service conditions during pending regularization proceedings.
Delhi Parshashan Vikas Vibhag Industrial Employees Union v. Department of Social Welfare & Ors.
Delhi High Court held that contractual Data Entry Operators must be retained with unchanged service conditions under new contractors procured via GeM portal, while regularization claims proceed before labour courts.