Delhi High Court
36,659 judgments
KSHEM KUMAR v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking a Review Medical Board for recruitment, holding that the medical fitness decisions of the Armed Forces Medical Boards are final and binding under applicable regulations and Navy Orders.
Prem Chandra Thakur v. Central Industrial Security Force
The Delhi High Court dismissed CISF's review petition, upholding its earlier order allowing a writ petition challenging termination despite the petitioner's criminal antecedents and probationary status, emphasizing acquittal on merits and proper application of law.
Sher Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging decades-old land acquisition proceedings, holding that stale claims cannot be revived under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Land Acquisition Act and emphasizing the presumption of regularity of official acts.
Navin Kumar Sharma v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed grant of pro rata pension to the petitioner if similarly placed as in precedent cases, subject to verification and payment of arrears with interest.
Irfan Chhenu v. State, National Capital Territory of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail plea of the petitioner accused of murder and conspiracy, holding that judicial custody on the date of offence does not preclude conspiracy liability and bail is discretionary based on case facts.
Irfan @ Chhenu v. State, NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of the petitioner accused of murder and conspiracy, holding that his role as gang leader and serious charges warranted denial of bail despite some hostile witnesses and bail granted to co-accused.
Novelty Merchants Private Limited v. National Faceless Assessment Centre Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside a faceless income tax assessment order for failure to issue mandatory show cause notice and draft order, emphasizing compliance with Section 144B and principles of natural justice.
Raj Kanwar v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to grant pro rata pension with arrears to the petitioner if found similarly placed as in earlier judgments, subject to verification and procedural safeguards.
Pushpa Builders Ltd v. The Vaish Cooperative Adarsh Bank Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that banks must maximize mortgaged property value during execution sales and upheld compound interest as per compromise, directing satisfaction of decree at the auction sale price despite petitioner’s objections.
Anand Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging non-regularization of service due to delay and unsatisfactory record, refusing to interfere with the Tribunal's order upheld by detailed administrative reasons.
Micro Labs Limited v. Bristol Myers Squibb Holdings Ireland Unlimited
The Delhi High Court directed expeditious disposal of an interlocutory application concerning an ex-parte injunction and recall order in a patent infringement suit, allowing the appellant to seek suspension of the recall direction pending final decision.
M/S SUISSE A LA MODE (P) (LTD) v. M/S KAPOOR ENTERPRISES
The Delhi High Court upheld the mandatory 75% pre-deposit requirement under Section 19 of the MSMED Act before entertaining arbitration award challenges, dismissing the petition against the Commercial Court's order.
Arun Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the Indian Air Force to verify and grant pro rata pension to the petitioner if similarly placed as in prior cases, with interest on delayed arrears, or communicate reasons for denial.
EX CPL ASIT KUMAR v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Indian Air Force to verify and grant pro rata pension with arrears to the petitioner if similarly placed as in precedent cases, ensuring procedural fairness and interest on delayed payments.
Orchid Container Line (Thailand) Co Ltd v. IAPL Group & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the validity of a compromise decree, holding that internal disputes among company directors cannot be adjudicated in the suit and no enforceable right was lost by the appellant.
Ravina and Associates Pvt Ltd & Anr. v. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that only funds directly linked to the criminal offence constitute case property subject to restraint, allowing release of excess funds for tax recovery while preserving amounts connected to the crime.
Shiv Kumar v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking action against alleged illegal construction by a petitioner with no connection to the property and no affected legal rights, holding that such a petitioner lacks locus standi under Article 226.
AYG REALITY PRIVATE LIMITED v. NBCC(INDIA) LIMITED AND ANR.
The Delhi High Court held that the defects liability period in a construction contract is fixed at twelve months per building from taking over, and the contractor is entitled to release of bank guarantees and security deposits upon expiry of this period and submission of final bills, overruling NBCC's attempts to withhold payments and guarantees beyond the DLP.
Vandana v. M/S HBL Globel Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that reinstatement is not automatic in illegal termination cases and enhanced compensation awarded in lieu of reinstatement to the petitioner.
Balbir Singh Bisht v. M/S. A V Workshop Limited and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that illegal termination does not automatically entitle reinstatement, enhanced retrenchment compensation was awarded instead, and reinstatement was denied due to loss of trust and confidence.