Delhi High Court

74,231 judgments

Year:

Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) Delhi v. India Trade Promotion Organisation

12 Jan 2022 · Manmohan; Navin Chawla · 2022:DHC:147-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld that the India Trade Promotion Organisation's activities qualify as charitable purposes under the Income Tax Act, dismissing the revenue's appeal and affirming exemption eligibility despite incidental commercial activities.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 2(15) Section 10(23C)(iv) charitable purpose

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-3 v. M/S GTM Builder and Promoters Pvt. Ltd.

12 Jan 2022 · Manmohan; Navin Chawla · 2022:DHC:196-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal upholding deletion of additions for alleged bogus purchases due to violation of natural justice and proper application of Accounting Standard AS-7.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 132 search and seizure bogus purchases principles of natural justice

T. Harish Kumar v. State NCT of Delhi

12 Jan 2022 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2022:DHC:160

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 188 IPC for lack of evidence and improper investigation, holding that inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. can be exercised to prevent abuse of process when no offence is made out.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR Section 188 IPC police verification

National Highways Authority of India v. M/S Hindustan Construction Co Ltd.

12 Jan 2022 · Vibhu Bahru · 2022:DHC:154

The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award granting additional costs for delays attributable to NHAI but set aside the award of loss of profit due to lack of evidentiary basis.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Extension of Time (EOT) General Conditions of Contract Additional Costs

Vikas Chaudhary v. Union of India and Ors.

12 Jan 2022 · Rekha Palli · 2022:DHC:122
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court quashed a Look Out Circular issued against a businessman on grounds of mere suspicion without cognizable offence, emphasizing judicial review and protection of fundamental rights against indefinite travel restrictions.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant Look Out Circular LOC Income Tax Act Black Money Act

ICICI Bank Limited v. Rashmi Sharma

12 Jan 2022 · Amit Bansal, J. · 2022:DHC:151

The Delhi High Court held that a subordinate court cannot initiate criminal contempt proceedings and that sending summons via WhatsApp alongside regular service does not amount to contempt or overreach the judicial process.

civil appeal_allowed Significant criminal contempt service of summons WhatsApp service jurisdiction of subordinate courts

Muskan Dental Care v. Director-Medical-Delhi & Ors.

12 Jan 2022 · Vipin Sanghi; Jasmeet Singh · 2022:DHC:203-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging cancellation of a dental services tender, holding that delay and changed circumstances preclude enforcement of the contract at old rates, but directed refund of the performance guarantee.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant e-tender cancellation performance guarantee public-private partnership contract enforcement

Ahmed Ali v. BSES Yamuna Power Ltd & Ors.

12 Jan 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2022:DHC:132
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court directed BSES Yamuna Power Ltd to provide electricity connection to the petitioner without requiring a no objection certificate from the Delhi Waqf Board, subject to compliance with prior orders and formalities, without affecting property rights.

administrative petition_allowed electricity connection no objection certificate Delhi Waqf Board Section 56 Waqf Act

Gautam Pathak v. East Delhi Municipal Corporation

12 Jan 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2022:DHC:131

The court declined to direct allotment of an alternative parking site not found financially viable but ordered the respondent to consider the petitioner's request or refund the deposited amount.

administrative petition_dismissed mandamus allotment parking site tender

Gain Chand @ Rahul v. The State Govt. of NCT, Delhi

12 Jan 2022 · Mukta Gupta · 2022:DHC:128

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 307 IPC of a husband who attacked his wife and mother-in-law with an axe, affirming that grievous injury and intention to murder were proved despite non-examination of the doctor who prepared the MLC.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 307 IPC grievous hurt intention to murder injured witnesses

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) – 3 v. Ishwar Chand Mittal

12 Jan 2022 · Manmohan; Navin Chawla · 2022:DHC:148-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's decision invalidating the reassessment notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, holding that reassessment cannot be initiated to reopen issues already examined in the original assessment.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 Section 153A reassessment notice

Ram Kishan v. Satya Vir Singh

12 Jan 2022 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2022:DHC:164

The Delhi High Court set aside the dismissal of an eviction petition under the Delhi Rent Control Act for inadequate analysis of property identity and landlord-tenant relationship, remanding the case for fresh consideration.

civil other Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 14(1)(e) landlord-tenant relationship property identity dispute

Pramod v. State

11 Jan 2022 · Mukta Gupta · 2022:DHC:119

The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for grievous injury to a police official but modified the sentence to the period already served, emphasizing credible medical evidence and eyewitness testimony.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant grievous injury Section 333 IPC assault on public servant medical evidence

M/S. INDO INTERNATIONAL TOBACCO LTD. v. SHRI VIVEK PRASAD, ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL, DGGI & ORS.

11 Jan 2022 · MANMOHAN; NAVIN CHAWLA · 2022:DHC:123-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that Section 6(2)(b) of the CGST Act and the CBEC Circular dated 05.10.2018 do not bar multi-jurisdictional GST investigations consolidated under an all-India jurisdictional authority like DGGI Ahmedabad Zonal Unit.

tax petition_dismissed Significant CGST Act Section 6 GST jurisdiction intelligence based enforcement DGGI jurisdiction

Bharpur Hooda v. Union of India & Ors.

11 Jan 2022 · Manmohan; Navin Chawla · 2022:DHC:167-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a candidate cannot be declared medically unfit for being overweight if his weight and BMI fall within the permissible 5 kg variation as per CAPF recruitment medical guidelines.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Detailed Medical Examination Review Medical Examination overweight borderline cases

Adhir Kumar Verma v. Central Reserve Police Force & Ors.

11 Jan 2022 · Manmohan; Navin Chawla · 2022:DHC:195-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the medical unfitness declaration of a CAPF recruitment candidate with multiple keloids, refusing to interfere with expert medical opinion absent mala fide.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant medical fitness keloid CAPF recruitment Review Medical Board

Chitra v. Union of India & Ors.

11 Jan 2022 · Manmohan; Navin Chawla · 2022:DHC:166-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a 5 kg permissible variation in weight must be considered in CAPF recruitment medical examinations, setting aside the petitioner’s medical unfitness declaration due to overweight.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Detailed Medical Examination Review Medical Examination overweight Body Mass Index

S. S. Chauhan v. Union of India & Ors.

11 Jan 2022 · Rajiv Shakdher; Talwant Singh · 2022:DHC:144-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the denial of interest on delayed retiral benefits, holding that interest claims cannot be independently adjudicated and pensionary benefits may be withheld during disciplinary proceedings under CCS (Pension) Rules.

administrative petition_dismissed interest on delayed payment retiral benefits CCS (Pension) Rules 1972 Rule 68

Rajinder Kumar v. Raj Kumar & Ors.

11 Jan 2022 · Amit Bansal · 2022:DHC:161

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging eviction under the Delhi Rent Control Act, holding that tenancy rights must be assessed as on the eviction petition date and unauthorized sub-letting by a minor is not protected tenancy.

property petition_dismissed Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 eviction tenancy sub-letting

Sanny Tomer v. Union of India & Ors.

11 Jan 2022 · Manmohan; Navin Chawla · 2022:DHC:165-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court set aside the medical unfitness declaration based on overweight, holding that a 5 kg variation and BMI must be considered as per CAPF recruitment guidelines.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Detailed Medical Examination Review Medical Examination overweight Body Mass Index