Delhi High Court
74,231 judgments
Sunder Singh Bhati v. The State
The Delhi High Court granted bail to petitioners accused of a large-scale economic fraud, holding that gravity of offence alone cannot deny bail absent risk of flight or tampering.
DHARAMRAJ v. INCOME TAX OFFICER
The Delhi High Court held that a notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act issued to a deceased person is void and all consequent proceedings are invalid, allowing the writ petition challenging such notice.
Neeta Bhardwaj & Ors. v. Kamlesh Sharma
Delhi High Court directed coordinated redevelopment of Kalkaji Mandir premises including temporary shops, financial contributions, fund consolidation, and eviction of non-compliant occupants under the supervision of a court-appointed Administrator.
Neeta Bhardwaj & Ors. v. Kamlesh Sharma
The Delhi High Court directed coordinated redevelopment of Kalkaji Mandir premises with fixed financial contributions, consolidation of deposited funds, and compliance by shopkeepers, while permitting temporary constructions under civic authority oversight.
G.S Sandhu & Anr. v. Geeta Aggarwal
Directors of a judgment debtor company cannot be compelled to disclose their personal assets in execution proceedings against the company absent a proper application and clear evidence justifying lifting the corporate veil.
Ashish Gupta v. Tata Power Delhi Distribution Limited
The Delhi High Court held that a tenant can obtain a fresh electricity connection without landlord's NOC, subject to clearing dues and complying with regulations, recognizing electricity as linked to the fundamental right to life.
Raghav Gupta v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court set aside the CAT order passed by one bench with reasons given by another, remanding the matter for fresh hearing to uphold procedural propriety.
Bharat Aluminium Company Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that under the faceless assessment scheme, issuance of Show Cause Notice and granting personal hearing upon request are mandatory procedural requirements, setting aside the impugned assessment order and remanding the matter for fresh proceedings.
Vichitra Prestressed Concrete Udhyog Pvt. Ltd. v. Central Board of Trustees EPF
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging EPFO recovery proceedings, holding that the petitioners had received the orders through authorized representatives and misled the court by falsely claiming non-receipt.
Neeta Bhardwaj & Ors. v. Kamlesh Sharma
The Delhi High Court directed consolidation of funds, permitted temporary constructions, fixed financial contributions, and issued eviction notices to facilitate the redevelopment of Kalkaji Mandir under court supervision.
Neeta Bhardwaj v. Kamlesh Sharma
The Delhi High Court directed consolidation of funds, regulated temporary shop allotments, and issued eviction notices to facilitate the redevelopment of Kalkaji Mandir under court supervision.
M/S Prabhu Land & Finance v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the Union of India's review petition to set aside impermissible overlapping interest awarded on land acquisition compensation under Section 23(1A) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
Neeta Bhardwaj v. Kamlesh Sharma
The Delhi High Court directed implementation of the Administrator's redevelopment plan for Kalkaji Mandir, including fund consolidation, eviction of occupants, and cooperation of civic authorities.
Neeta Bhardwaj v. Kamlesh Sharma
Delhi High Court directs coordinated redevelopment of Kalkaji Mandir premises including consolidation of funds, eviction of occupants, and cooperation of civic authorities under Court supervision.
Neeta Bhardwaj v. Kamlesh Sharma
Delhi High Court approved the Kalkaji Mandir redevelopment plan including temporary shops, consolidated deposited funds for redevelopment, and directed eviction of non-compliant occupants under court supervision.
M/S METALROD PVT. LTD. v. M/S Y.K. HOSPITALITY & ORS.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate interlinked disputes arising from lease and loan agreements through two separate arbitration proceedings under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Neeta Bhardwaj v. Kamlesh Sharma
The Delhi High Court directed consolidation of funds, eviction of occupants, and authorized temporary constructions and financial contributions for the redevelopment of Kalkaji Mandir premises under court supervision.
Neeta Bhardwaj v. Kamlesh Sharma
The Delhi High Court directed commencement of Kalkaji Mandir redevelopment with court-monitored temporary constructions, consolidation of deposited funds, eviction of unauthorized occupants, and creation of a legal entity for fund management.
Fateh Saharan v. Rohit Saharan
The Delhi High Court enhanced interim maintenance for a minor child from Rs. 15,000 to Rs. 25,000 per month and directed expeditious disposal of the maintenance petition by the Family Court.
Neeta Bhardwaj & Ors. v. Kamlesh Sharma
The Delhi High Court directed coordinated redevelopment of Kalkaji Mandir premises by consolidating deposited funds, fixing rents for temporary shops, directing eviction of unauthorized occupants, and overseeing fund management through a court-appointed administrator.