Delhi High Court
74,231 judgments
Neeta Bhardwaj v. Kamlesh Sharma
The Delhi High Court directed implementation of redevelopment plans for Kalkaji Mandir, consolidation of deposited funds, eviction of non-compliant shopkeepers, and creation of a legal entity for transparent fund management.
Neeta Bhardwaj v. Kamlesh Sharma
The Delhi High Court directed implementation of a supervised redevelopment plan for Kalkaji Mandir, including fund consolidation, temporary shop construction, and eviction of unauthorized occupants, ensuring coordinated management under Court oversight.
Satish Kumar v. Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the petitioner to approach the Consumer Grievances Redressal Forum for disputed electricity bill issues and granted interim protection against disconnection until the CGRF takes up the matter.
Shakti Industries v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that closure of a welfare scheme does not bar release of sanctioned benefits to eligible beneficiaries and directed the respondent to consider the petitioner’s claim fairly, emphasizing legitimate expectation and non-arbitrariness under Article 14.
SOM Projects Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed arbitration petitions as withdrawn after the petitioner challenged the court's territorial jurisdiction and chose to approach a different court.
Rohit Paswan v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
Bail was denied to the petitioner accused of trafficking minor children under Section 370 IPC due to the gravity of offences and supporting evidence at the early trial stage.
M/S MBD PRINTOGRAPHICS PVT LTD v. M/S PARAGON PAPER INDUSTRIES
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes arising from multiple agreements between parties, allowing separate arbitration proceedings under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
KAKE DI HATTI v. SHREE FOODS AND ORS
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate franchise disputes following termination and default by the respondents.
AMR-BBB Consortium v. Bharat Coking Coal Ltd.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 after institutional arbitration failed, holding that the disputes are arbitrable and the petitioner is entitled to arbitration despite withdrawal of ICC proceedings.
Dr. Kousik Das Mahapatra v. Govt. of NCT Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted interim relief allowing a contractual employee to apply and participate in a UPSC examination pending final adjudication of his age relaxation claim before the Tribunal.
Ramesh Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed verification and grant of pro rata pension to the petitioner if similarly placed as in precedent cases, with procedural safeguards and interest on delayed arrears.
Suryodhan Tyagi v. Tirender Sharma
The Delhi High Court upheld the complaint under Section 138 NI Act and the interim compensation order under Section 143A, holding that such orders cannot be quashed at the pre-trial stage where statutory conditions are met.
India Tourism Development Corporation v. M/S Bajaj Electricals Ltd.
The Delhi High Court condoned the delay in filing and re-filing a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that initial non-est filing does not bar limitation if defects are cured within the extended period.
Narender@Ninde v. State
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal, set aside the conviction under POCSO and IPC, and remanded the case for retrial due to failure to decide recall application and absence of counsel during cross-examination causing prejudice.
Bhaskar Industries Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. National Textile Corporation Ltd. & Anr.
The Delhi High Court appointed nominee arbitrators for both parties under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to constitute the arbitral tribunal as per the arbitration agreements.
Rahul Wadhwani & Anr. v. Rajesh Anand
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's decree granting possession and rent arrears to the landlord based on an oral tenancy and sale deed, dismissing the tenants' appeal challenging the landlord-tenant relationship and adverse possession claim.
AXIS ENERGY VENTURES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court upheld the financial qualification criteria requiring the lead member of a consortium to individually meet net worth thresholds in a government PLI scheme RFP, dismissing the petition challenging its reasonableness and validity.
M/S AEE ENGINEEERS AND CONTACTORS & ANR. v. IGNOU THROUGH ITS VICE CHANCELLOR
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate payment disputes arising from a contract between M/s AEE Engineers and IGNOU after the respondent failed to appoint an arbitrator.
M/S DORO DESIGNS PVT LTD v. M/S RADIUM CREATION LTD
The Delhi High Court held that since part of the cause of action arose in Delhi, the trial court had territorial jurisdiction and set aside the order returning the plaint for lack of jurisdiction.
Gurina Kaur v. M/S. Narang Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a subsequent settlement agreement without an arbitration clause discharges the original arbitration agreement, dismissing the petition for appointment of an arbitrator.