Delhi High Court
74,644 judgments
M/S Shivalaya Construction Company Pvt. Ltd. v. Delhi Development Authority
Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging an arbitral award, upholding limited claims and affirming principles limiting judicial interference in arbitration awards and evidentiary requirements for contractual claims.
Nisha Ara v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL seeking demolition of alleged illegal construction, holding that such factual disputes cannot be adjudicated in writ jurisdiction and directing authorities to consider grievances with due process.
Namita Verma & Ors. v. Momman Khan & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that under Order XIII Rule 1 CPC and the Delhi High Court Rules, production of original documents for inspection suffices and filing originals is not mandatory, dismissing the petition challenging the Trial Court's order.
Rahul Sanwariya and Anr v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL challenging the complete ban on firecrackers during Diwali 2021 as infructuous after the festival passed, allowing petitioners liberty to seek remedies if fresh cause arises.
Anjana Gosain v. Government of NCT and Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the GNCTD to clear the petitioner's outstanding legal fees promptly and endorsed the development of an Online Single Window System to ensure timely payments.
Sarvesh Security Services Pvt Ltd v. Guru Govind Singh Govt Hospital
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate payment disputes arising from a security services contract, directing arbitration under DIAC rules.
Sidharth Chauhan v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) Through SHO
The Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail to the Managing Director of a real estate company accused of large-scale fund diversion and threats, emphasizing the necessity of custodial interrogation in serious economic offences.
Jagran Prakashan Limited v. 3Y3 Digital Labs Private Limited
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to resolve a payment dispute where parties failed to mutually agree on the arbitrator.
EZEN AVIATION PTY LIMITED & ANR. v. BIG CHARTER PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court set aside interim orders restraining the appellants from dealing with aircraft parts due to the respondent's failure to commence arbitration within the statutory period under Section 9(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Sidharth Chauhan v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
Anticipatory bail was denied to the Managing Director accused of large-scale real estate fraud involving misappropriation of funds and threats to witnesses, emphasizing the necessity of custodial interrogation in serious economic offences.
Radhika Ashar and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking extension of the internship completion cut-off date for AYUSH postgraduate admissions, holding that administrative eligibility criteria fixed by the Ministry are binding and not arbitrarily extendable.
Veterans Forum for Transparency in Public Life v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to expeditiously consider the petitioner's grievances regarding the Bureau of Indian Standards' statutory functions without granting substantive relief, disposing of the PIL with liberty for further remedies.
Anand Ballabh v. Union of India
The Court held that disability pension claims require case-specific medical evaluation to establish service attribution and directed the petitioner to file a representation for reconsideration.
M/S SHAURYA IMPEX v. M/S SOUTH INDIA TRADING COMPANY
The Delhi High Court directed the trial court to grant one opportunity to examine a crucial bank official under Section 311 Cr.P.C. to ensure a fair trial, emphasizing the wide discretionary power of courts to summon witnesses essential for just decision.
GD K Jayavelu v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the Director General, BSF to decide the petitioner's pending revocation of voluntary discharge petition within four weeks, emphasizing the obligation to consider revocation requests before final acceptance.
Pushpanjali Rana v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court allowed writ petitions directing retrospective promotion of petitioners to Assistant Commandants and Deputy Commandants with consequential benefits, following seniority principles and Supreme Court precedent.
M/S SHAURYA IMPEX v. M/S SOUTH INDIA TRADING COMPANY
The Delhi High Court directed the trial court to grant one opportunity to summon and examine a bank official under Section 311 Cr.P.C. to ensure a fair trial, subject to payment of costs.
M/S SHAURYA IMPEX v. M/S SOUTH INDIA TRADING COMPANY
The Delhi High Court directed the trial court to grant one opportunity to summon and examine a bank official under Section 311 Cr.P.C., emphasizing the accused's right to a fair trial and the essentiality of such evidence for just decision.
M/S SHAURYA IMPEX v. M/S SOUTH INDIA TRADING COMPANY
The Delhi High Court directed the trial court to grant the petitioner one opportunity to summon and examine a crucial bank official under Section 311 Cr.P.C., emphasizing the right to a fair trial and judicious exercise of discretion.
Arjun Sethi v. All About Outdoor Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that it has jurisdiction to appoint a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act despite the arbitration venue being Gurugram, upholding party autonomy in designating the appointing court.