Delhi High Court

74,644 judgments

Year:

M/S WANTI OVERSEAS v. COMMISSIONER OF VAT & ANR.

14 Dec 2021 · D. N. Patel; Jyoti Singh · 2021:DHC:4175-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner's VAT refund claim expeditiously and pay interest if entitled, following the Supreme Court's principles in Mafatlal Industries Ltd.

tax other Significant Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2005 refund claim Section 42 DVAT Act interest on refund

Vinita Singh & Ors. v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

14 Dec 2021 · V. Kameswar Rao · 2021:DHC:4165

Delhi High Court directed a private unaided school to pay teachers salaries and arrears as per 7th CPC and comply with statutory benefits under provident fund and gratuity laws.

labor petition_allowed Significant 7th Central Pay Commission private unaided recognized schools salary revision Employees Provident Fund

Kaushalya v. Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission and Anr.

14 Dec 2021 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2021:DHC:4168

The Delhi High Court allowed restoration of electricity supply via prepaid connection pending resolution of disputed bills by the Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum, subject to partial payment by the petitioner.

administrative appeal_allowed electricity supply restoration billing dispute Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum prepaid electricity connection

Monish Das v. Rubina Rathore

14 Dec 2021 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2021:DHC:4164

The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition challenging the confirmation of an ex parte domestic violence maintenance order, holding that proper service and timely challenge are essential and appellate courts have discretionary powers under Order 41 Rule 33 CPC.

family appeal_dismissed Significant Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 ex parte order service of summons maintenance

ICETRAIL LOGISTICS PVT. LTD. v. KUEHNE+ NAGEL PVT. LTD.

14 Dec 2021 · SURESH KUMAR KAIT · 2021:DHC:4167

The Delhi High Court granted a joint petition extending the Arbitral Tribunal's mandate by three months under Sections 29A(4) and (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to enable passing of the Arbitral Award.

civil petition_allowed Arbitral Tribunal Extension of mandate Arbitral Award Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

NATIONAL SEEDS CORPORTION LTD. & ANR. v. RAM AVTAR GUPTA

14 Dec 2021 · Manmohan; Navin Chawla · 2021:DHC:4174-DB

The Delhi High Court held that interest claimed in arbitration proceedings must be included in the aggregate value of the claim for determining pecuniary jurisdiction under the Commercial Courts Act, dismissing the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant pecuniary jurisdiction Commercial Courts Act, 2015 arbitration aggregate value

GOEL CONSTRUCTION CO. v. DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD.

14 Dec 2021 · SURESH KUMAR KAIT · 2021:DHC:4166

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to resolve contract disputes where the respondent failed to suggest arbitrator names after arbitration was invoked.

civil petition_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) appointment of arbitrator contract dispute

M/S SHAURYA IMPEX v. M/S SOUTH INDIA TRADING COMPANY

13 Dec 2021 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2021:DHC:4155

The Delhi High Court directed the trial court to grant one opportunity to examine a bank official under Section 311 Cr.P.C., emphasizing the accused's right to a fair trial and judicious exercise of discretion.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 311 CrPC summoning witness fair trial discretionary power

Rajesh Kumar Modanwal v. M/S A.R. Spares Pvt. Ltd.

13 Dec 2021 · Manmohan J; Navin Chawla J · 2021:DHC:4162-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld an injunction restraining the appellant from using the trademark 'AR GOLD', holding that similarity in marks and goods creates likelihood of confusion justifying protection of the prior user's trademark rights.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant trademark infringement passing off likelihood of confusion prior user

JAGDAMBA v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

13 Dec 2021 · Rajiv Shakdher; Talwant Singh · 2021:DHC:4161-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing the respondents to consider the petitioner’s representation regarding allotment and HRA issues related to a Type-II Railway quarter and pass a speaking order within six weeks.

administrative appeal_allowed Type-II Railway quarter house rent allowance Central Administrative Tribunal waitlist

Realistic Realtors Pvt. Ltd. v. Karanpreet Singh Walia & Anr.

13 Dec 2021 · Amit Bansal · 2021:DHC:4138

The Delhi High Court held that a suit for recovery of consultancy fees under an agreement relating to leasing commercial immovable property qualifies as a commercial dispute under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Commercial Courts Act, 2015 commercial dispute immovable property consultancy agreement

Novartis AG & Anr. v. Natco Pharma Limited

13 Dec 2021 · C. Hari Shankar · 2021:DHC:4143

The Delhi High Court granted interlocutory injunction to Novartis against Natco Pharma, holding that the suit patent on Eltrombopag Olamine is prima facie valid and infringed, rejecting the defendant's challenge based on prior art and patentability grounds.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant patent infringement interlocutory injunction pharmaceutical patent Eltrombopag Olamine

Moveen v. State

13 Dec 2021 · Subramonium Prasad · 2021:DHC:4135

The Delhi High Court granted interim bail to an accused in an online fraud case after considering the documentary nature of evidence, completion of investigation, and low risk of tampering or absconding.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant interim bail online fraud Section 420 IPC forgery

Waris v. State of NCT of Delhi

13 Dec 2021 · Subramonium Prasad · 2021:DHC:4133

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to accused in an online fraud case after investigation completion, emphasizing the balance between liberty and the gravity of organized cybercrime.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail online fraud forgery Section 420 IPC

Waris v. State of NCT of Delhi

13 Dec 2021 · Subramonium Prasad · 2021:DHC:4132

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to accused in an organized online fraud case after investigation completion, emphasizing the balance between liberty and prevention of justice subversion.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail online fraud Section 420 IPC documentary evidence

Omender v. State

13 Dec 2021 · Subramonium Prasad · 2021:DHC:4136

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's bail application in a dowry death and murder case, holding that a prima facie case exists and bail is not warranted at this stage.

criminal petition_dismissed bail dowry death Section 302 IPC Section 304B IPC

Waris v. State of NCT of Delhi

13 Dec 2021 · Subramonium Prasad · 2021:DHC:4134

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to accused in an online fraud case after investigation completion, emphasizing documentary evidence and imposing conditions to prevent tampering and absconding.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail online fraud Section 420 IPC forgery

FDC Limited v. TAS MED (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANR.

13 Dec 2021 · Asha Menon · 2021:DHC:4137

The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction restraining defendants from using the deceptively similar pharmaceutical trademark "CINZITAS," protecting the plaintiff's registered mark "CINZAN" against infringement and passing off.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement pharmaceutical trademarks deceptive similarity interim injunction

SMS WATER GRACE BMW PVT. LTD. v. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI DIRECTORATE OF HEALTH SERVICES

13 Dec 2021 · Vibhu BakhrU · 2021:DHC:4142

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award interpreting a contract to require the petitioner to collect and treat all bio-medical waste free of charge without quantity limitation, dismissing the petitioner’s claim for compensation for excess waste treated.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Contract interpretation Bio-medical waste Clause 10

Vinod Sharma v. Estate Officer, Delhi Development Authority

13 Dec 2021 · Yashwant Varma · 2021:DHC:4151

The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of unauthorized occupants under the Public Premises Act, holding that payment of damages does not confer rights and limitation does not bar proceedings.

property petition_dismissed Significant Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 unauthorized occupation payment of damages limitation