Delhi High Court
71,673 judgments
State NCT of Delhi v. Akash @ Gunni
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a sexual offence case against a minor victim due to unreliable testimony and lack of corroborative evidence.
Emandi A R Ajay Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to consider and grant pro-rata pension to an ex-IAF personnel with over 10 years of service, in line with government notifications and prior judgments.
Saloni Bansal and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Central Administrative Tribunal to expeditiously dispose of the petitioners' recruitment-related dispute to prevent prejudice caused by undue delay.
Flyover Distillers and Bottlers Private Limited v. OM Sons Marketing Private Limited
The Delhi High Court directed expeditious hearing of the appellant's application under Section 39(4) CPC to vacate an ex parte injunction, emphasizing timely disposal and limited arguments.
Ram Kumar v. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a decade-delayed appeal against a motor accident claim award, holding that the appellant failed to demonstrate sufficient cause for condonation of delay or justify setting aside the ex-parte award.
Din Dayal v. Director General Central Industrial Security Force & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the CISF to consider the petitioner’s request for posting in his home sector as per service policy and stayed the transfer orders pending such consideration.
Jagjeet Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court referred contract payment disputes involving common questions to a sole arbitrator for adjudication under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Jagjeet Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed reference of payment-related contractual disputes involving common issues to a sole arbitrator under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Raj Kumari Taneja v. Rajinder Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration Act to resolve partnership disputes, holding that questions of settlement are for the arbitrator to decide.
Raj Kumari Taneja v. Rajinder Kumar & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration Act, the Court must appoint an arbitrator if an arbitration agreement exists and the petition is timely, leaving factual disputes such as settlement to the arbitrator.
Sohan Lal v. Sohan Lal Passi
The High Court upheld a decree for possession against appellants claiming adverse possession, holding that mere long possession without proof of hostile intent and other elements does not establish title by adverse possession.
Mohit Saini v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to consider and grant pro-rata pension to an ex-IAF personnel with over 10 years of service, in line with government notifications and prior judgments.
Starbucks Corporation v. Teaquila A Fashion Cafe & Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and awarded notional damages to Starbucks Corporation against unauthorized use of its well-known FRAPPUCCINO trademark by a café, establishing infringement and passing off.
M/S JAKKI MULL & SONS v. JAGDISH THAKRAL
The Delhi High Court held that a counter claim referred to arbitration must be adjudicated upon even if an amendment application is withdrawn, setting aside the arbitrator's refusal to decide it.
Agbahia Ikenna v. State
Bail was denied to a foreign national accused of possessing commercial quantity of heroin under the NDPS Act, as procedural irregularities did not outweigh the bar under Section 37 and risk of absconding.
Shree Kripa Agro v. Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Services Tax
The Delhi High Court held that tax authorities cannot pass reassessment orders under the DVAT Act for a financial year already assessed under the Central Sales Tax Act, quashing the impugned orders and directing refund with interest.
OCM Singapore Njord Holdings Hardrada Pte Ltd. & Anr. v. Prerit Goel & Ors.
Delhi High Court holds it has jurisdiction and pierces corporate veil to hold directors personally liable for fraudulently misappropriated cargo sale proceeds, granting interim reliefs against asset dissipation.
M/S COBRA INSTALACIONES Y SERVICIOS, S.A. & M/S SHYAM INDUS POWER SOLUTION PVT LTD. (JV) v. HARYANA VIDYUT PRASARAN NIGAM LTD.
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions challenging an arbitral award that rejected the claim for sales tax reimbursement, holding the contract price to be all-inclusive and refusing judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Haryana Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Limited v. Cobra Instalaciones Y Services SA and Shyam Indus Power Solution Pvt Ltd JV
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award denying recovery of deferment charges on non-leviable liquidated damages and affirmed the Arbitral Tribunal's contract interpretation on interest, dismissing HVPNL's challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
Haryana Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Limited v. Cobra Instalaciones Y Services SA and Shyam Indus Power Solution Pvt Ltd JV
The Delhi High Court dismissed HVPNL's challenge to an arbitral award, holding that deferment charges cannot be recovered on non-leviable liquidated damages and that the Arbitral Tribunal's interpretation of contract clauses on interest is final.