Delhi High Court
33,081 judgments
Rizwan Zafar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that possession of requisite work experience before the application deadline is the primary eligibility criterion and directed appointment of the petitioner despite incomplete disclosure due to application form constraints.
SHRI SAI CO-OPERATIVE THRIFT AND CREDIT SOCIETY LTD. v. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 43-6
The Delhi High Court quashed the income tax notices and order for failing to grant the mandatory minimum seven days to the petitioner to respond under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Divya Capital One Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 7(1) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed reassessment notices and order under the amended Income Tax Act for failure to consider the assessee’s detailed reply and remanded the matter for fresh reasoned determination in accordance with law.
The Commissioner of Income Tax v. GS1 India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal by the Income Tax Commissioner, upholding ITAT's grant of exemption under sections 11 and 12 of the Income Tax Act to GS1 India, confirming the activities as charitable and not commercial.
The South Indian Bank Ltd v. Transstroy Dindigul - Theni - Kumili Tollways Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
The Delhi High Court appointed a nominee Arbitrator on behalf of a non-cooperative party to complete the Arbitral Tribunal, enabling arbitration to proceed without prejudice to jurisdictional objections.
GAIL(INDIA) LTD. v. TRIVENI ENGINEERING & INDUSTRIES LTD.
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award directing refund of liquidated damages and partial release of withheld amounts, affirming the binding nature of the Engineer-in-Charge's decisions and the arbitrator's discretion on interest and evidentiary matters.
Varun Gupta v. Irrigation and Flood Control Department Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court referred surviving disputes under a contract's arbitration clause to the Delhi International Arbitration Centre for appointment of a sole arbitrator, directing compliance with Section 12 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
M/S Shakti Oil and Chemical Co. v. Commissioner of DGST Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed desealing of the petitioner’s business premises upon production of relevant documents, emphasizing lawful procedure and protection of the fundamental right to carry on business under Article 19(1)(g).
Jasbir Singh v. State
The Delhi High Court allowed the appellant's criminal appeal and acquitted him of kidnapping and intimidation charges due to unexplained FIR delay, material contradictions in prosecution evidence, and lack of proof of prosecutrix's minority.
Gujarat Gas Limited v. Vedanta Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed Gujarat Gas's petition seeking interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act, holding that Vedanta duly notified termination and Gujarat Gas failed to validly exercise its Right of First Refusal within the contractual period.
M L BROTHER LLP v. MAHESHKUMAR BHURALAL TANNA
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction to the registered trademark owner against unauthorized use of a deceptively similar mark, holding that an unchallenged Local Commissioner's report is admissible evidence without mandatory examination.
Meenakshi Manna v. Suriti Manna & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that Order XII Rule 6 and Order XV Rule 1 CPC serve distinct purposes and a trial court must independently assess triable issues before dismissing an application under Order XV Rule 1, setting aside the dismissal of such application solely based on rejection under Order XII Rule 6.
V Guard Industries Ltd v. Crompton Greaves Consumer Electricals Ltd
The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction restraining the Defendant from using the mark 'PEBBLE' for electric irons, holding that the Plaintiff's registered trademark's dominant part is infringed under Section 29(4) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 due to the Defendant's unauthorized use without due cause.
Parvesh Gaur v. Ranbir Singh
The High Court directed the trial court to decide the application for amendment and then decide the preliminary issues framed before proceeding with the trial, dismissing the petition challenging the interim order.
Dr. Jatinder Bali v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court held that the petitioner’s application was within the extended limitation period suspended due to COVID-19 and remanded the matter for adjudication on merits.
Jose Inacio Cota v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking full disclosure of evidence in UK rape extradition proceedings, holding that only prima facie evidence is required and no violation of natural justice or racial discrimination was established.
Macchita Malik v. Union of India Ministry of Personnel Public Grievances Pensions & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the cancellation of the petitioner’s Civil Services candidature due to lack of intimation for medical examination and directed his appointment based on merit.
Amit Kumar Tripathi v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court set aside the cancellation of a DDA plot allotment, holding that statutory Nazul Land Rules govern eligibility and that allotment cannot be cancelled if existing land owned is less than 67 sq.mtrs.
Naved v. The State
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail to an accused charged with armed attack on police personnel, holding that prima facie evidence and the gravity of offences preclude bail at this stage.
Satpal Singh Kirar v. Bank of Baroda
The Delhi High Court held that Article 227 does not confer jurisdiction to challenge a bank's actions under Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act and dismissed the petition accordingly.