Delhi High Court

33,081 judgments

Year:

Dr. Sameer Bele v. Union of India & Ors.

11 May 2022 · Rekha Palli · 2022:DHC:1839

The Delhi High Court held that Rural Area Category reservation is a horizontal reservation applicable across vertical categories, dismissing the petition challenging allotment of a reserved seat to an SC candidate.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Rural Area Category reservation horizontal reservation vertical reservation SC/ST/OBC reservation

Azhar Rasheed v. State NCT of Delhi and Ors.

11 May 2022 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2022:DHC:1848

The Delhi High Court held that hair transplantation must be performed by qualified medical professionals and directed investigation and regulatory action against unqualified practitioners causing death by medical negligence.

criminal other Significant hair transplantation medical negligence medical malpractice aesthetic surgery

Ambika Pillai Designer Salon v. Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs & Ors.

11 May 2022 · Rajiv Shakdher; Poonam A. Bamba · 2022:DHC:1874-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the revenue authorities to consider the petitioner’s representation for extension of time under the Sabka Vishwas Scheme due to health hardship, without directly granting relief or quashing recovery notices.

administrative other Sabka Vishwas Scheme time extension tax recovery writ petition

ANK HOTELS PVT. LTD. v. M S DGN RESORTS PARTNERSHIP FIRM

11 May 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2022:DHC:1835

Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator with parties' consent under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, directing compliance with fee and disclosure provisions.

arbitration petition_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Appointment of arbitrator Section 12 disclosure Fourth Schedule fees

EXTRAMARKS EDUCATION INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. MES CENTRAL SCHOOL

11 May 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2022:DHC:1834

The Delhi High Court held that disputes under the subject agreements are arbitrable and the petitioner did not waive its right to arbitration by filing a written statement in an unrelated suit, directing reference to arbitration within the extended limitation period.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration agreement waiver of arbitration limitation period suspension of limitation

EXTRAMARKS EDUCATION INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. MES CENTRAL SCHOOL

11 May 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2022:DHC:1833

The Delhi High Court held that filing a written statement in an unrelated suit does not waive arbitration rights and referred disputes under education service agreements to arbitration within the extended limitation period.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration agreement waiver of arbitration limitation period COVID-19 suspension of limitation

Phonographic Performance Limited v. Lookpart Exhibitions and Events Private Limited

11 May 2022 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2022:DHC:1878

The Delhi High Court appointed an expert to interpret the exemption under Section 52(1)(za) of the Copyright Act regarding use of sound recordings at marriage-related social events, highlighting the need to balance copyright protection with cultural practices.

intellectual_property other Significant Copyright Act 1957 Section 52(1)(za) fair use exemption

Sanjeev Kumar Sinha v. The State (Govt of NCT Delhi)

11 May 2022 · Rajnish Bhatnagar · 2022:DHC:1840

The Delhi High Court dismissed bail applications of the CEO accused of large-scale financial fraud in stock broking, emphasizing the gravity of economic offences and ongoing investigation.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail economic offence white collar crime Power of Attorney

RIT FOUNDATION v. THE UNION OF INDIA

11 May 2022 · Rajiv Shakdher; C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:1825-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the constitutional validity of the Marital Rape Exception in Section 375 IPC, ruling that criminalization of non-consensual sex within marriage is a legislative domain and the exception does not violate fundamental rights.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Marital Rape Exception Section 375 IPC Section 376B IPC Section 198B CrPC

International Hospital Limited v. DCIT Circle 12 (2)

11 May 2022 · Yashwant Varma; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:7422-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that assessment notices issued in the name of amalgamating companies dissolved by operation of law are void and not curable under Section 292B of the Income Tax Act, affirming the Supreme Court's ruling in Maruti Suzuki.

tax appeal_allowed Significant amalgamation Scheme of Arrangement Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 292B

Pankaja Panda & Ors. v. Leela Kapila & Ors.

10 May 2022 · Amit Bansal · 2022:DHC:1873
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that the four children of late Mrs. Sheila Kapila each have an absolute 25% undivided share in the suit property, decreed partition without trial, and directed sale of the property with proceeds divided accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed Significant partition suit undivided share Will interpretation absolute bequest

M/S EVALUESERVE SEZ (GURGAON) PVT. LTD. v. THE NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR MINORITIES

10 May 2022 · Yashwant Varma · 2022:DHC:1823

The Delhi High Court held that the National Commission for Minorities lacks jurisdiction to direct reinstatement of an employee and set aside the Commission's order directing reinstatement.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant National Commission for Minorities Act, 1992 jurisdiction of statutory commissions employee reinstatement termination of employment

Indus Towers Ltd v. Income Tax Officer & Ors.

10 May 2022 · Manmohan; Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2022:DHC:1827-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed reassessment proceedings initiated by a non-jurisdictional Income Tax Officer, affirming that reassessment notices must be issued by the correct jurisdictional officer under the Income Tax Act, 1961.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 Section 148A(d) reassessment proceedings

Sunita Makkar v. Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi and Ors.

10 May 2022 · Jasmeet Singh · 2022:DHC:1895

Delhi High Court quashed FIR under Section 25 of the Arms Act against petitioner for unconscious possession of live ammunition found in a borrowed handbag.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 25 Arms Act conscious possession live ammunition unconscious possession

Jatayu Enterprises Services v. State Bank of India

10 May 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2022:DHC:1812

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator and referred disputes arising from caretaking service agreements containing arbitration clauses to arbitration, leaving limitation and maintainability issues to the tribunal.

arbitration appeal_allowed arbitration clause appointment of arbitrator arbitration and conciliation act 1996 section 12 disclosure

National Highways Authority of India v. PCL STICCO JV

10 May 2022 · Najmi Waziri; Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2022:DHC:2239-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award holding that the expulsion of a contractor was illegal due to employer's breaches, dismissing the appeal challenging the award under limited judicial review standards.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 challenge expulsion of contractor extension of time

Phool Wati v. Om Prakash

10 May 2022 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2022:DHC:1859

The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition against the dismissal of a second appeal challenging a preliminary partition decree, holding no substantial question of law arose and the appeal was rightly dismissed for non-prosecution.

civil petition_dismissed Significant second appeal substantial question of law preliminary decree of partition final decree of partition

Ritesh Kakkar @ Sonu v. The State

10 May 2022 · Talwant Singh, J. · 2022:DHC:1919

The Delhi High Court granted one month’s interim suspension of sentence and bail to a POCSO convict on humanitarian grounds to arrange family accommodation and care for his infant daughter, subject to strict conditions.

criminal appeal_allowed interim suspension of sentence bail POCSO Act Section 6 POCSO

Shebu v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

10 May 2022 · Talwant Singh · 2022:DHC:1918

Bail was denied to the accused in a murder case due to ongoing trial, presence of scientific evidence linking him to the crime, and seriousness of the offence.

criminal appeal_dismissed bail Section 302 IPC murder DNA profiling

Rakesh Saraha v. Union of India

10 May 2022 · Jasmeet Singh, J · 2022:DHC:2048

The Delhi High Court held that the Central Government's arbitrary refusal to concur with the Sentence Reviewing Board's recommendation for premature release of a life convict violates Article 14 and directed the petitioner's immediate release.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant premature release life imprisonment Sentence Reviewing Board Central Government concurrence