Delhi High Court

71,673 judgments

Year:

Pankaja Panda & Ors. v. Leela Kapila & Ors.

10 May 2022 · Amit Bansal · 2022:DHC:1873
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court held that the four children of late Mrs. Sheila Kapila each have an absolute 25% undivided share in the suit property, decreed partition without trial, and directed sale of the property with proceeds divided accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed Significant partition suit undivided share Will interpretation absolute bequest

M/S EVALUESERVE SEZ (GURGAON) PVT. LTD. v. THE NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR MINORITIES

10 May 2022 · Yashwant Varma · 2022:DHC:1823

The Delhi High Court held that the National Commission for Minorities lacks jurisdiction to direct reinstatement of an employee and set aside the Commission's order directing reinstatement.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant National Commission for Minorities Act, 1992 jurisdiction of statutory commissions employee reinstatement termination of employment

Indus Towers Ltd v. Income Tax Officer & Ors.

10 May 2022 · Manmohan; Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2022:DHC:1827-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed reassessment proceedings initiated by a non-jurisdictional Income Tax Officer, affirming that reassessment notices must be issued by the correct jurisdictional officer under the Income Tax Act, 1961.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 Section 148A(d) reassessment proceedings

Sunita Makkar v. Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi and Ors.

10 May 2022 · Jasmeet Singh · 2022:DHC:1895

Delhi High Court quashed FIR under Section 25 of the Arms Act against petitioner for unconscious possession of live ammunition found in a borrowed handbag.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 25 Arms Act conscious possession live ammunition unconscious possession

Jatayu Enterprises Services v. State Bank of India

10 May 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2022:DHC:1812

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator and referred disputes arising from caretaking service agreements containing arbitration clauses to arbitration, leaving limitation and maintainability issues to the tribunal.

arbitration appeal_allowed arbitration clause appointment of arbitrator arbitration and conciliation act 1996 section 12 disclosure

National Highways Authority of India v. PCL STICCO JV

10 May 2022 · Najmi Waziri; Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2022:DHC:2239-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award holding that the expulsion of a contractor was illegal due to employer's breaches, dismissing the appeal challenging the award under limited judicial review standards.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 challenge expulsion of contractor extension of time

Phool Wati v. Om Prakash

10 May 2022 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2022:DHC:1859

The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition against the dismissal of a second appeal challenging a preliminary partition decree, holding no substantial question of law arose and the appeal was rightly dismissed for non-prosecution.

civil petition_dismissed Significant second appeal substantial question of law preliminary decree of partition final decree of partition

Ritesh Kakkar @ Sonu v. The State

10 May 2022 · Talwant Singh, J. · 2022:DHC:1919

The Delhi High Court granted one month’s interim suspension of sentence and bail to a POCSO convict on humanitarian grounds to arrange family accommodation and care for his infant daughter, subject to strict conditions.

criminal appeal_allowed interim suspension of sentence bail POCSO Act Section 6 POCSO

Shebu v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

10 May 2022 · Talwant Singh · 2022:DHC:1918

Bail was denied to the accused in a murder case due to ongoing trial, presence of scientific evidence linking him to the crime, and seriousness of the offence.

criminal appeal_dismissed bail Section 302 IPC murder DNA profiling

Rakesh Saraha v. Union of India

10 May 2022 · Jasmeet Singh, J · 2022:DHC:2048

The Delhi High Court held that the Central Government's arbitrary refusal to concur with the Sentence Reviewing Board's recommendation for premature release of a life convict violates Article 14 and directed the petitioner's immediate release.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant premature release life imprisonment Sentence Reviewing Board Central Government concurrence

GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI v. ANJANA

10 May 2022 · Najmi Waziri; Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2022:DHC:2007-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT order directing appointment of the respondent as an OBC candidate based on a valid OBC certificate issued by the competent Delhi authority, emphasizing acceptance of such certificates for recruitment.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant OBC certificate reservation competent authority GNCTD

DCM Shriram Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

10 May 2022 · Manmohan; Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2022:DHC:1826-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a reassessment notice under Section 148 cannot be issued when the original assessment is pending before the DRP, and allowed the writ petition challenging such notice issued post-amalgamation.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Act 1961 Section 148 reassessment notice Dispute Resolution Panel

Krishnan Subramanian v. State of NCT of Delhi

10 May 2022 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2022:DHC:1805

Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the applicant in an economic offences case after finding no prima facie risk of tampering or absconding, emphasizing the crystallization of investigation and documentary nature of evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail economic offences chargesheet documentary evidence

Anis @ Dupettewala v. The State (Govt. of NCT, Delhi)

10 May 2022 · Talwant Singh · 2022:DHC:1853

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a murder case on the ground of parity with co-accused and completed sentences in other cases, emphasizing that prior convictions alone cannot justify indefinite detention during trial.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant regular bail parity in bail prior convictions evidence tampering

Millennium School v. Pawan Dawar

10 May 2022 · Vibhu Bakru · 2022:DHC:1796

The Delhi High Court held that a non-obstante clause permitting termination for material breach overrides a lock-in period, set aside the arbitral award’s loss of profits, upheld outstanding fees and interest, and ruled that Section 65-B Evidence Act does not strictly apply to arbitration evidence.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 lock-in period termination of contract non-obstante clause

SAYA BUILDCON PRIVATE LIMITED v. MR VIJAY KUMAR AGGARWAL & ORS.

09 May 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2022:DHC:1785

The Delhi High Court referred the parties' dispute arising from a partnership agreement to arbitration, appointed a sole arbitrator, and allowed parties to seek interim reliefs from the Arbitral Tribunal under the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil petition_dismissed Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 9 Section 17 Section 11

Kayoom v. State

09 May 2022 · Talwant Singh · 2022:DHC:1784

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to an accused implicated under the NDPS Act primarily on co-accused disclosures and voice sample evidence, emphasizing the need for speedy trial and parity with co-accused already on bail.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act regular bail disclosure statement voice sample

Sanjay Enterprises v. Commissioner of Trade and Taxes

09 May 2022 · Rajiv Shakdher; Poonam A. Bamba · 2022:DHC:1849-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the revenue to adjudicate long-pending tax objections within 15 days, emphasizing strict adherence to statutory timelines under the Delhi VAT Act and mandating modernization of notice service procedures.

tax petition_allowed Significant Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 Section 74 objections default assessment statutory timelines

Chanchal Kochar v. Delhi Development Authority

09 May 2022 · VIPIN SANGHI, ACJ; NAVIN CHAWLA, J · 2022:DHC:1846-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging cancellation of a DDA flat allotment due to delayed payments, holding that mutation for refund does not confer allotment rights and delay condonation cannot revive stale claims.

property appeal_dismissed Delhi Development Authority MIG Flat allotment condonation of delay automatic cancellation

Punjab and Sind Bank v. Oberoi Cars Pvt Ltd & Anr.

09 May 2022 · VIPIN SANGHI, ACJ; NAVIN CHAWLA, J · 2022:DHC:1845-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a bank cannot unilaterally revise One-Time Settlement terms after full payment by the borrower and must release mortgaged property documents accordingly.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant One-Time Settlement mortgaged properties loan repayment extension of time