Delhi High Court
71,673 judgments
Vinod Singh Chandel v. The State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to accused in a criminal case after considering investigation progress, nature of injuries, and imposing conditions to prevent witness tampering.
Anil Kumar and Co. v. The Commissioner of Trade and Taxes and Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the revenue to adjudicate long-pending tax objections within 15 days, emphasizing mandatory statutory timelines and ordering creation of an online portal for notice service.
BS Puria v. Indraprastha Power Generation Co. Ltd. & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the Director (Technical) was competent to initiate disciplinary proceedings and issue charge sheets imposing major penalties under the CCS (CCA) Rules and relevant delegation of powers, dismissing the appellant's challenge.
Asst. Comdt. Vedpal v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court set aside the petitioner’s de-induction from the Central Wrestling Team, directing a fair trial and proper maintenance of performance records before final decision.
Vinod Singh Chandel v. The State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to accused in a serious assault case after considering investigation progress, lack of criminal history, and imposing strict conditions to prevent witness interference.
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -6 v. Maruti Suzuki India Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeals against ITAT orders, affirming the Supreme Court's interpretation that stay orders under Section 254(2A) of the Income-tax Act can only be vacated if delay in appeal disposal is attributable to the assessee.
Lalit Kumar Poddar v. Income Tax Officer & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside the reopening notice and order under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act for failure to consider the assessee’s reply and directed the Assessing Officer to pass a fresh reasoned order in compliance with Section 148A(d).
Jagjeet Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed reference of payment disputes under contract to a sole arbitrator, appointing Mr. Baljeet Singh Dhir to adjudicate all related claims and counterclaims.
Jagjeet Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed reference of payment disputes under multiple contracts to a single arbitrator, affirming arbitration as the appropriate forum for unresolved claims including interest and rejected payments.
Ravi Inder Singh Johar v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed FIR under Section 25 of the Arms Act against a petitioner who unknowingly possessed dummy cartridges, holding that conscious possession is essential for offence under the Arms Act.
Shri Hari Shamsher Kaushik v. Shri Jasbir Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld dismissal of a complaint under Section 138 N.I. Act for non-impleadment of the company, affirming that vicarious liability under Section 141 arises only if the company is prosecuted as the principal accused.
Jai Kishan Datwani v. State, Govt. of NCT Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the Sessions Court's order setting aside the discharge of the accused under Sections 498A and 304B IPC, directing committal for trial based on prima facie evidence of cruelty and antemortem injuries.
Lumax Industries Limited & Ors. v. Hindustan Auto Industries
The Delhi High Court directed the Trial Court to hear the petitioners' interlocutory applications for ex parte injunction and appointment of Local Commissioner before service of summons on the respondent, allowing the petition for appropriate directions.
Surinder Pal Vij v. Gurmeet Singh Baweja & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a writ petition under Article 226 is not maintainable against a private company not discharging public functions, dismissing the challenge to election notices of the All India Motor Transport Congress.
Sholay Media Entertainment and Anr. v. Yogesh Patel and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the plaintiffs' exclusive rights in the mark 'SHOLAY', granted permanent injunctions against the defendants' unauthorized use of the mark and domain names, and awarded damages and costs for trademark infringement and passing off.
National Highway Authority of India v. MEP Chennai Bypass Toll Road Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that an ad hoc Arbitral Tribunal not bound by institutional rules may fix its own fees, and a party's acquiescence bars later challenge to the Tribunal's mandate on fee grounds.
Pritam Singh v. Ashok Kumar Makkar
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to summon two additional defence witnesses and directed strict adherence to trial dates without adjournments to ensure expeditious disposal.
Tanya Sharma v. Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing DSSSB to appoint the petitioner with seniority as per merit and imposed costs for administrative delay in processing her candidature.
Sanjana Rai alias Ankita Rai v. State and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of Sanjana Rai for trafficking and sexually exploiting a minor, affirming that minor inconsistencies in a child victim's testimony do not undermine the prosecution's case.
Union of India v. Delhi State Consumer Co Operative Federation Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that an arbitral tribunal can recall its termination order under Section 25(a) of the Arbitration Act on sufficient cause, and the High Court can supervise such jurisdictional failures under Article 227.