Delhi High Court
33,441 judgments
Ojha v. Controller General of Patents Designs and Trademarks
The Delhi High Court upheld costs on CGPDTM officers for procedural lapses, clarified the procedure for oppositions filed beyond limitation during the pandemic, and directed expeditious recruitment and mediation to address trademark opposition pendency.
Udipt Mani Jain v. The State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court allowed bail to accused in an economic offences case, holding that absence on bail order date due to misunderstanding does not indicate flight risk and that the dispute over money receipt is a trial issue.
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd v. M/S Dhampur Sugar Mills
The Delhi High Court upheld the setting aside of an arbitral award for damages under a liquidated damages clause due to failure to plead and prove actual loss, affirming that proof of legal injury is essential even under such clauses.
Ravinder Yadav v. Puneet Kumar Goel & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's appeal challenging the disposal of a contempt petition after the original Court order was modified, holding that the contempt petition lost its maintainability and no illegality was found in accepting respondents' affidavits without advance copies.
Arun Chopra v. Chandra Associates Pvt Ltd
The High Court upheld eviction of a sub-tenant inducted without owner’s consent, affirming limited scope of Article 227 jurisdiction to interfere with concurrent findings of fact in rent control disputes.
Ojha v. Controller General of Patents Designs and Trademarks
The Delhi High Court clarified procedural lapses and directed administrative reforms in CGPDTM’s handling of trademark oppositions filed beyond limitation, while upholding costs and ensuring oppositions proceed on merits without affecting ongoing civil disputes.
Ojha v. Controller General of Patents Designs and Trademarks
The Delhi High Court upheld costs on CGPDTM officers for procedural lapses, clarified the procedure for oppositions filed beyond limitation under pandemic extensions, and directed expeditious recruitment and mediation to address trademark opposition pendency.
M/S Rudraksha Marketing v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-1
The Delhi High Court condoned delay and set aside the Tribunal's order for lack of reasoned findings, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication on merits.
Radico Khaitan Ltd v. Registrar Trade Marks
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and directed registration of the trademark “EFKAY’S XXX RUM (Device)” after recognizing the valid assignment of the mark “EFKAY’S” to the appellant, subject to non-exclusivity of descriptive elements.
Gulati Enterprises v. Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
The Delhi High Court held that mandatory pre-show cause consultation under Rule 142(1A) of the CGST Rules, 2017 is a prerequisite to issuing a show cause notice under Section 74 of the CGST Act, and set aside the impugned notice for non-compliance.
M/S BLUE HEAVEN COSMETICS PVT LTD v. SHIVANI COSMETICS THROUGH ITS PARTNERS VINOD MONGA NISHANT MONGA
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages to Blue Heaven Cosmetics for trademark and trade dress infringement by Shivani Cosmetics, proceeding ex parte due to the defendant's non-appearance.
Ravinder Kaur Khurana v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 28-1 Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed the reassessment notice and order under Section 148A for failure to consider the petitioner’s reply, emphasizing mandatory procedural compliance and adequate time for filing replies under the Income Tax Act.
Pappu Sharma v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking to quash demolition orders and stay municipal action, holding that the petitioner must exhaust alternate remedies before the Appellate Tribunal under the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act.
M/S Sri Shyam Incorporation & Anr. v. M/S Shree Balaji Industries
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions challenging a commercial court order due to improper language attributing obstinacy to the court, emphasizing the necessity of dignified pleadings.
Ketan Ribbons Pvt Ltd v. National Faceless Assessment Centre Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside an income tax assessment order passed without affording the petitioner an opportunity to respond due to COVID-19 lockdown-related difficulties, holding it violated natural justice.
Krishan Kumar Lal v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that a quasi-permanent CPWD employee absorbed into IAAI before 1988 is entitled to pro-rata pension for CPWD service, setting aside the tribunal's denial.
Sandeep Singh v. Simran Sodhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail, holding that serious allegations alone do not justify bail cancellation without material evidence of misuse or interference with justice.
Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited v. Seraphic Divine Beauty Private Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed defendant no.2's application to set aside an ex-parte order due to non-appearance, emphasizing strict adherence to procedural timelines under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.
N.D. Tyagi v. Power Finance Corporation Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that PFCL validly initiated disciplinary proceedings against an employee for misconduct during deputation to its wholly owned subsidiary, affirming that jurisdiction reverts to the lending authority after repatriation.
Sandeep Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a trial court can modify interlocutory orders under Section 451 Cr.P.C. for custody of property, and dismissed the petition challenging such modification for lack of jurisdiction and violation of natural justice.