Delhi High Court
71,673 judgments
M L BROTHER LLP v. MAHESHKUMAR BHURALAL TANNA
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction to the registered trademark owner against unauthorized use of a deceptively similar mark, holding that an unchallenged Local Commissioner's report is admissible evidence without mandatory examination.
Meenakshi Manna v. Suriti Manna & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that Order XII Rule 6 and Order XV Rule 1 CPC serve distinct purposes and a trial court must independently assess triable issues before dismissing an application under Order XV Rule 1, setting aside the dismissal of such application solely based on rejection under Order XII Rule 6.
V Guard Industries Ltd v. Crompton Greaves Consumer Electricals Ltd
The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction restraining the Defendant from using the mark 'PEBBLE' for electric irons, holding that the Plaintiff's registered trademark's dominant part is infringed under Section 29(4) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 due to the Defendant's unauthorized use without due cause.
Parvesh Gaur v. Ranbir Singh
The High Court directed the trial court to decide the application for amendment and then decide the preliminary issues framed before proceeding with the trial, dismissing the petition challenging the interim order.
Dr. Jatinder Bali v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court held that the petitioner’s application was within the extended limitation period suspended due to COVID-19 and remanded the matter for adjudication on merits.
Jose Inacio Cota v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking full disclosure of evidence in UK rape extradition proceedings, holding that only prima facie evidence is required and no violation of natural justice or racial discrimination was established.
Macchita Malik v. Union of India Ministry of Personnel Public Grievances Pensions & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the cancellation of the petitioner’s Civil Services candidature due to lack of intimation for medical examination and directed his appointment based on merit.
Amit Kumar Tripathi v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court set aside the cancellation of a DDA plot allotment, holding that statutory Nazul Land Rules govern eligibility and that allotment cannot be cancelled if existing land owned is less than 67 sq.mtrs.
Naved v. The State
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail to an accused charged with armed attack on police personnel, holding that prima facie evidence and the gravity of offences preclude bail at this stage.
Satpal Singh Kirar v. Bank of Baroda
The Delhi High Court held that Article 227 does not confer jurisdiction to challenge a bank's actions under Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act and dismissed the petition accordingly.
Dr. Sameer Bele v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that Rural Area Category reservation is a horizontal reservation applicable across vertical categories, dismissing the petition challenging allotment of a reserved seat to an SC candidate.
Azhar Rasheed v. State NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that hair transplantation must be performed by qualified medical professionals and directed investigation and regulatory action against unqualified practitioners causing death by medical negligence.
Ambika Pillai Designer Salon v. Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the revenue authorities to consider the petitioner’s representation for extension of time under the Sabka Vishwas Scheme due to health hardship, without directly granting relief or quashing recovery notices.
ANK HOTELS PVT. LTD. v. M S DGN RESORTS PARTNERSHIP FIRM
Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator with parties' consent under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, directing compliance with fee and disclosure provisions.
EXTRAMARKS EDUCATION INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. MES CENTRAL SCHOOL
The Delhi High Court held that disputes under the subject agreements are arbitrable and the petitioner did not waive its right to arbitration by filing a written statement in an unrelated suit, directing reference to arbitration within the extended limitation period.
EXTRAMARKS EDUCATION INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. MES CENTRAL SCHOOL
The Delhi High Court held that filing a written statement in an unrelated suit does not waive arbitration rights and referred disputes under education service agreements to arbitration within the extended limitation period.
Phonographic Performance Limited v. Lookpart Exhibitions and Events Private Limited
The Delhi High Court appointed an expert to interpret the exemption under Section 52(1)(za) of the Copyright Act regarding use of sound recordings at marriage-related social events, highlighting the need to balance copyright protection with cultural practices.
Sanjeev Kumar Sinha v. The State (Govt of NCT Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail applications of the CEO accused of large-scale financial fraud in stock broking, emphasizing the gravity of economic offences and ongoing investigation.
RIT FOUNDATION v. THE UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court upheld the constitutional validity of the Marital Rape Exception in Section 375 IPC, ruling that criminalization of non-consensual sex within marriage is a legislative domain and the exception does not violate fundamental rights.
International Hospital Limited v. DCIT Circle 12 (2)
The Delhi High Court held that assessment notices issued in the name of amalgamating companies dissolved by operation of law are void and not curable under Section 292B of the Income Tax Act, affirming the Supreme Court's ruling in Maruti Suzuki.