Delhi High Court

58,461 judgments

Year:

Manisha Agarwal v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 59(1), Delhi & Ors.

09 Oct 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar · 2025:DHC:8984-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that reassessment notices issued beyond the surviving limitation period under the Income Tax Act, as clarified by the Supreme Court in Ashish Agarwal, are time-barred and invalid, setting aside the impugned notices and orders for AY 2014-15.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 Section 148A reassessment notice

The State (GNCT of Delhi) v. Mandeep & Anr

09 Oct 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:9224

The High Court upheld conviction under Section 411 IPC and Section 392 IPC but upheld acquittal under Section 397 IPC due to lack of evidence of weapon use, partially allowing the State's appeal.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant robbery Section 392 IPC Section 397 IPC Section 411 IPC

Ansal Housing Limited v. Samyak Projects Private Limited

09 Oct 2025 · Jyoti Singh · ARB. A. (COMM.) 44/2025

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitrator's interlocutory order directing a security deposit to protect financial interests, emphasizing limited judicial interference under Section 37(2)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 17 Section 37(2)(b) interlocutory order

Mittal and Mayank Sansanwal v. Satyvir Singh

09 Oct 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:9097-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Placement of employees in higher pay grades following cadre bifurcation based on seniority constitutes upgradation and disqualifies them from MACP Scheme benefits.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant MACP Scheme financial upgradation promotion vs upgradation cadre restructuring

Santosh Devi v. Union of India

09 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9013-DB

The Delhi High Court held that upon an eligible child joining government service, the entire family pension of a deceased government servant accrues to the widow under Rule 54(7)(b) of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant family pension Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 Rule 54(7)(b) eligible child

Mr. Akshat Singh and Mr. Utkarsh Kandpal v. Union of India & Anr

09 Oct 2025 · Sachin Datta · 2025:DHC:9144

The Delhi High Court held that mere delay in furnishing RTI information without malafide intent does not warrant penalty under Section 20 of the RTI Act and upheld the CIC’s dismissal of the petitioner’s complaint.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Right to Information Act, 2005 Section 20 penalty malafide intent CPIO delay

C Jithin Kumar v. Central Board of Secondary Education

09 Oct 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:9050-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of a candidate’s application for an IT analyst post, holding that advertisement clarifications on continuous experience and reputed organizations are binding and the candidate cannot count internship or non-continuous experience.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant recruitment rules continuous work experience internship experience reputed institution

Maharani Bagh Co-Operative House Building and Welfare Society Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors.

09 Oct 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2025:DHC:9064-DB

The Delhi High Court directed urgent implementation of alternative drainage solutions and expedited construction of a Fixed Compactor Transfer Station to resolve chronic waterlogging and environmental concerns in Maharani Bagh colony.

administrative other waterlogging storm water drain Maharani Bagh Public Works Department

Union of India v. Major Gaurav Sheoran Retd

09 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9014-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's order granting disability pension to a retired officer who resigned but suffered a service-attributable disability, distinguishing it from voluntary retirement cases barred under Regulation 50.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension resignation voluntary retirement Army Pension Regulations

Soniya v. Union of India and Ors

09 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9009-DB

The Delhi High Court held that execution of a maintenance order cannot be sought by a writ petition under Article 226 and must be pursued through execution proceedings.

constitutional petition_dismissed writ petition Article 226 maintenance order execution proceedings

Eagle Hunter Solutions Ltd v. Kuldeep Chaturvedi

09 Oct 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:9108

The Delhi High Court set aside a labor tribunal award for lack of reasons and improper back wages grant, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication with directions to file pleadings and evidence.

labor appeal_allowed Significant reinstatement back wages quasi-judicial reasons denial of justice

Shriram General Insurance Co Ltd v. Meenu Chawla & Ors.

09 Oct 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:9103

The Delhi High Court held that absence of a valid permit for Delhi does not constitute a fundamental breach of the insurance policy, dismissing the insurer's appeal and upholding compensation awarded for a fatal motor accident.

motor_vehicles_accident_compensation appeal_dismissed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 permit conditions insurance recovery rights fundamental breach

Rahul Kumar & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr.

09 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9028-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition as withdrawn on the petitioners' request without adjudicating the merits.

constitutional petition_dismissed writ petition withdrawal dismissal as withdrawn petitioners

Samarendra, Advs v. Government of NCT of Delhi

09 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9029-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of a writ petition to enable the petitioner to pursue the matter before the Central Administrative Tribunal, affirming the CAT’s exclusive jurisdiction over service matters.

administrative petition_allowed Central Administrative Tribunal jurisdiction writ petition service matters

M/S MOMS CRADLE PRIVATE LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR

09 Oct 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:9065-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking condonation of delay in filing a statutory appeal under the CGST Act, holding that the limitation period is strict and refund can be adjusted against the demand raised for fraudulent ITC.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant CGST Act 2017 Section 107 appeal limitation condonation of delay

Neetu Suri v. Rajesh Malik & Anr.

09 Oct 2025 · Amit Bansal · 2025:DHC:9088

The Delhi High Court held that defendants against whom specific allegations of fraudulent share transfers are made cannot be deleted from the suit under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC, affirming their status as necessary and proper parties.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order 1 Rule 10 CPC necessary party proper party deletion of parties

Dr. Rupali Mishra v. Dr. Mannan Gupta

09 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9005-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court permitted the appellants to withdraw their appeal without expressing any opinion on the merits and disposed of the appeal accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed Procedural appeal withdrawal leave to withdraw appeal modification of order vacation of order

Rakesh Kumar Shrivastava v. Union of India & Ors.

09 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9011-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition as withdrawn after the petitioner informed that his grievance had been resolved.

constitutional petition_dismissed writ petition withdrawal grievance resolved disposal as withdrawn

Alkali Manufacturers Association of India v. Union of India

09 Oct 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:9055-DB

The Delhi High Court directed strict enforcement of DGFT's Minimum Import Price notifications on Soda Ash imports, dismissing the petition after confirming compliance by Customs authorities.

administrative petition_dismissed Minimum Import Price Soda Ash DGFT Notification Customs enforcement

Naseem Ahmed v. Deepak Singh

09 Oct 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:8924-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Commercial Court's jurisdiction and summary decree for possession in a commercial tenancy dispute, affirming that suit valuation based on prevailing market rent is valid and a tenant cannot challenge landlord's title while in possession.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Commercial Court jurisdiction Pecuniary jurisdiction Order XII Rule 6 CPC Landlord-tenant relationship