Delhi High Court

92,628 judgments

Year:

Eagle Hunter Solutions Ltd v. Kuldeep Chaturvedi

09 Oct 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:9108

The Delhi High Court set aside a labor tribunal award for lack of reasons and improper back wages grant, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication with directions to file pleadings and evidence.

labor appeal_allowed Significant reinstatement back wages quasi-judicial reasons denial of justice

Shriram General Insurance Co Ltd v. Meenu Chawla & Ors.

09 Oct 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:9103

The Delhi High Court held that absence of a valid permit for Delhi does not constitute a fundamental breach of the insurance policy, dismissing the insurer's appeal and upholding compensation awarded for a fatal motor accident.

motor_vehicles_accident_compensation appeal_dismissed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 permit conditions insurance recovery rights fundamental breach

Rahul Kumar & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr.

09 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9028-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition as withdrawn on the petitioners' request without adjudicating the merits.

constitutional petition_dismissed writ petition withdrawal dismissal as withdrawn petitioners

Samarendra, Advs v. Government of NCT of Delhi

09 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9029-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of a writ petition to enable the petitioner to pursue the matter before the Central Administrative Tribunal, affirming the CAT’s exclusive jurisdiction over service matters.

administrative petition_allowed Central Administrative Tribunal jurisdiction writ petition service matters

M/S MOMS CRADLE PRIVATE LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR

09 Oct 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:9065-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking condonation of delay in filing a statutory appeal under the CGST Act, holding that the limitation period is strict and refund can be adjusted against the demand raised for fraudulent ITC.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant CGST Act 2017 Section 107 appeal limitation condonation of delay

Neetu Suri v. Rajesh Malik & Anr.

09 Oct 2025 · Amit Bansal · 2025:DHC:9088

The Delhi High Court held that defendants against whom specific allegations of fraudulent share transfers are made cannot be deleted from the suit under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC, affirming their status as necessary and proper parties.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order 1 Rule 10 CPC necessary party proper party deletion of parties

Dr. Rupali Mishra v. Dr. Mannan Gupta

09 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9005-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court permitted the appellants to withdraw their appeal without expressing any opinion on the merits and disposed of the appeal accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed Procedural appeal withdrawal leave to withdraw appeal modification of order vacation of order

Rakesh Kumar Shrivastava v. Union of India & Ors.

09 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9011-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition as withdrawn after the petitioner informed that his grievance had been resolved.

constitutional petition_dismissed writ petition withdrawal grievance resolved disposal as withdrawn

Alkali Manufacturers Association of India v. Union of India

09 Oct 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:9055-DB

The Delhi High Court directed strict enforcement of DGFT's Minimum Import Price notifications on Soda Ash imports, dismissing the petition after confirming compliance by Customs authorities.

administrative petition_dismissed Minimum Import Price Soda Ash DGFT Notification Customs enforcement

Naseem Ahmed v. Deepak Singh

09 Oct 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:8924-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Commercial Court's jurisdiction and summary decree for possession in a commercial tenancy dispute, affirming that suit valuation based on prevailing market rent is valid and a tenant cannot challenge landlord's title while in possession.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Commercial Court jurisdiction Pecuniary jurisdiction Order XII Rule 6 CPC Landlord-tenant relationship

Rajwanti Deshwal v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

09 Oct 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:9063
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court granted interim protection against demolition of the petitioner’s property due to disputed service of notices and absence of a Presiding Officer in the appellate tribunal, allowing time to file an appeal.

administrative petition_allowed Demolition Order Principles of Natural Justice Show Cause Notice Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Dass Paper Mart v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

09 Oct 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:9062

The Delhi High Court granted temporary de-sealing of business premises sealed without prior notice, directing the petitioner to file an appeal and emphasizing adherence to natural justice.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Sealing Order Principles of Natural Justice Show Cause Notice Factory License

Manauvar Ali v. Union of India & Ors.

09 Oct 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:9061

Delhi High Court held it has jurisdiction to grant a seven-month extension to a catering licensee affected by COVID-19, emphasizing uniformity of Railway policy and parity with similarly placed petitioners.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant territorial jurisdiction Article 226 Indian Railways Commercial Circular No. 20/2017

Arun Kumar Saini v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

09 Oct 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:9060

Delhi High Court granted interim protection restraining MCD from coercive demolition action pending hearing of a statutory appeal before a non-functional Appellate Tribunal.

administrative petition_allowed Significant statutory appeal demolition order interim protection municipal corporation

ARTI ENTERPRISES v. Union of India & Ors.

09 Oct 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:9068
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Delhi High Court held it has jurisdiction to grant a seven-month extension to petitioner’s Indian Railways catering licenses, aligning with prior relief granted to similarly placed parties under uniform Railway policy.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant territorial jurisdiction Article 226 Indian Railways Catering Policy license extension

Sayra v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

09 Oct 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:9059

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking demolition of illegal construction as not maintainable due to a pending civil suit and directed the MCD to grant a hearing before any demolition.

administrative petition_dismissed writ petition illegal construction demolition order abuse of process

Hitesh Kumar v. University of Delhi

09 Oct 2025 · Vikas Mahajan · 2025:DHC:9054

The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition challenging the University of Delhi's admission notification process, holding that candidates must vigilantly check all official website notifications and relief cannot be granted after admission closure.

administrative petition_dismissed admission notification University of Delhi PG Admission CUET PG Examination

M/S WELCUT INDUSTRIES v. COMMISSIONER, CGST, DELHI, NORTH COMMISSIONERATE

09 Oct 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:9000-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to deposit 10% of the GST demand as pre-deposit to stay recovery proceedings pending the functioning of the GST Appellate Tribunal and permitted filing of appeal thereafter.

tax petition_allowed Significant CGST Act Section 112 pre-deposit stay of recovery

Gajraj @ Amit @ Kalicharan v. State NCT of Delhi

09 Oct 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:9053
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court modified the appellant's conviction from attempt to murder under Section 307 IPC to attempt to cause grievous hurt under Section 308 IPC, reducing the sentence to the period already served due to lack of evidence of intent to cause death.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 307 IPC Section 308 IPC common intention attempt to murder

Union of India and Ors. v. Kartar Singh

09 Oct 2025 · Sachin Datta · 2025:DHC:8976
Cites 0 · Cited by 6

The Delhi High Court held that non-availability of information does not constitute denial under the RTI Act and set aside the penalty imposed on the CPIO for alleged denial of information.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Right to Information Act, 2005 Section 6(3) RTI Act Section 20 RTI Act denial of information