Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

Dharambir Dhan v. Union of India and Anr.

28 Oct 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:7449-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed rectification of a clerical error in its judgment to correctly reflect the petitioner's appointment year as 2014 instead of 2019.

administrative other clerical mistake rectification typographical error judgment correction

Swadeshi Civil Infrastructure Pvt Ltd v. All India Institute of Medical Sciences AIIMS New Delhi & Anr

28 Oct 2025 · Jasmeet Singh · 2025:DHC:9700
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that where the dispute and intention to arbitrate are clearly communicated through contractual dispute resolution steps, a separate Section 21 notice is not mandatory, and appointed a sole arbitrator rejecting the respondent’s objection of prematurity.

other appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Section 21 notice Dispute resolution mechanism

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-7 v. M/s Shivgori Builders Pvt

28 Oct 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's order invalidating mechanical approvals under Section 153D of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing the necessity of genuine application of mind by prescribed authorities before passing assessment orders in search cases.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 153D Income Tax Act Section 151 Income Tax Act approval validity mechanical approval

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax v. Om Shiv Buildtech Pvt. Ltd.

28 Oct 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's decision invalidating penalty notices under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for lack of specificity, dismissing the Revenue's appeals.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 271(1)(c) penalty Income Tax Act 1961 penalty notice validity concealment of income

RAMAA ADVISORS PRIVATE LIMITED v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE 20

28 Oct 2025 · V. KAMESWAR RAO; VINOD KUMAR

The Delhi High Court held that reassessment notices under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act are barred by limitation if issued beyond ten years from the date of receipt of seized material by the AO of the non-searched person.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 153C Income Tax Act limitation period reassessment ten-year block period

Govt of NCT of Delhi v. Vikash Saini

28 Oct 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:9488-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's order disposing of a police recruitment medical fitness challenge without reasons, emphasizing limited judicial interference with medical board decisions in disciplined forces recruitment.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant judicial review medical examination detailed medical examination review medical examination

Manohar Lal v. Delhi Development Authority and Ors.

28 Oct 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:9382-DB

The Delhi High Court held that in a suit by a non-executant in possession seeking declaration and injunction, only fixed court fee is payable as the injunction relief is independent and not consequential to the declaration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant court fee ad valorem fee fixed court fee declaration suit

Ajay Narain v. Aarti Singh & Ors.

28 Oct 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:9387-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the decree for specific performance of sale agreements, rejecting the appellant's claim that the transactions were loans and affirming compliance with foreign exchange regulations.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Agreement to Sell Specific Performance Transfer of Property Act Foreign Exchange Regulation Act

Sanjay Kumar v. Union of India

28 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul

The Delhi High Court upheld seniority fixation of Sahastra Seema Bal Assistant Commandants based on the 2003 and 2010 Recruitment Rules and DOPT instructions, rejecting challenges invoking the 2012 Rules.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Assistant Commandant Sahastra Seema Bal Seniority Recruitment Rules

Delhi Maharashtriya Educational and Cultural Society v. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Delhi & Ors

28 Oct 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar · 2025:DHC:9369-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a bona fide inadvertent delay in filing the audit report by a charitable trust constitutes reasonable cause for condonation under Section 119(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act, directing fresh consideration of the condonation application.

tax other Significant Income Tax Act 1961 Section 119(2)(b) condonation of delay Form 10B

Vikramjeet Masih v. Commissioner of Customs

28 Oct 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:9489-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging detention of gold jewelry, directing the petitioner to file an appeal against the confiscation order, emphasizing mandatory statutory procedure and limiting writ interference.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Customs Act, 1962 Show Cause Notice Detention of goods Confiscation order

Surender Kumar v. Manita; Devender Kumar v. Sunita

28 Oct 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar

The Delhi High Court upheld dismissal of divorce petitions on ground of cruelty, holding that unsubstantiated allegations and acquittals in related criminal cases do not satisfy the legal threshold for mental cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act.

family appeal_dismissed Significant mental cruelty Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 13(1)(ia) divorce

State v. Laxman Singh & Deepak

28 Oct 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:9400

The Delhi High Court set aside the acquittal and convicted the respondents under Section 323 IPC for causing simple injuries with a broken bottle, holding that the prosecution evidence was wrongly disbelieved by the trial court.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 323 IPC Section 324 IPC Simple injuries Dangerous weapon

Shishupal Singh and Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

28 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9444-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed an omnibus recovery order lacking individual liability allocation and emphasized adherence to natural justice before imposing penalties.

administrative petition_allowed Significant input tax credit GST recovery order natural justice

Delhi Development Authority v. Ashish Jain & Anr.

28 Oct 2025 · The Chief Justice; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2025:DHC:9399-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the entitlement of the purchaser to a 25% commercial component in a two-level parking plot under MPD 2021, rejecting DDA's unilateral attempt to rectify the conveyance deed and directing sanction of the building plan upon payment of applicable charges.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Conveyance Deed Commercial Component Master Plan Delhi 2021 Clause 12.14.3.7

State (NCT of Delhi) v. Bheem Kumar Jaiswal

28 Oct 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:9412

The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a rape case due to material contradictions in the prosecutrix's testimony and applied the principle of double presumption of innocence in appeals against acquittal.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant rape acquittal double presumption of innocence benefit of doubt

Virender Singh Bidhuri v. State (NCT of Delhi) and Anr

28 Oct 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:9396

Anticipatory bail was denied to the petitioner in a case under the SC/ST Act as a prima facie offence was made out and the statutory bar under Section 18 of the Act applied.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant anticipatory bail SC/ST Act Section 18 SC/ST Act public view

Shital Singh v. Union of India

28 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9467-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition for default and nonprosecution due to the petitioner's failure to appear and prosecute the matter.

constitutional petition_dismissed writ petition default dismissal nonprosecution petitioner's absence

Devyani Kundra v. State of NCT of Delhi

28 Oct 2025 · Sanjeev Narula · 2025:DHC:9421

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a murder case after a prima facie assessment found insufficient direct evidence and noted prolonged pre-trial detention and trial delays.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant regular bail Section 302 IPC murder criminal conspiracy

Subhash Pahwa v. State of NCT of Delhi

28 Oct 2025 · Sanjeev Narula · 2025:DHC:9423

The Delhi High Court set aside a subsequent conviction barred by double jeopardy under Article 20(2) and Section 300 CrPC and directed the Sentence Review Board to treat overlapping antecedents as one in premature release consideration.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant double jeopardy Article 20(2) Constitution Section 300 CrPC writ jurisdiction