Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

Union of India v. M/S GR-GAWAR (J.V.)

30 Oct 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025 SCC OnLine Del 636
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that a Section 34 petition filed without the arbitral award and beyond the 120-day limitation period is non est and barred by limitation, with delay not condonable.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Section 34 Arbitration and Conciliation Act non est filing limitation period condonation of delay

Patil Rail Infrastructure Pvt Ltd v. Pandrol Limited

30 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9542-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of the appeal without deciding merits after the appellants undertook not to use certain disputed diagrams during the pendency of the suit.

civil appeal_dismissed Procedural interlocutory appeal undertaking impugned diagrams disposal of appeal

Jagan Singh v. Union of India & Ors.

30 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9532-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed as premature a writ petition challenging the institution of a preliminary inquiry against a government official, holding that such inquiries cannot be interdicted before conclusion.

administrative petition_dismissed preliminary inquiry writ petition prematurity disciplinary proceedings

DAY1 ADVISORS PRIVATE LIMITED AND ORS v. CATALYST TRUSTEESHIP LIMITED AND ORS

30 Oct 2025 · Subramonium Prasad · 2025:DHC:9570

The Delhi High Court refused interim relief under Section 9 and appointed an arbitrator to adjudicate disputes over alleged default and sale of pledged shares under arbitration agreements.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 9 petition Section 17 application Debenture Trust Deed

State v. Parvesh Rana & Anr.

30 Oct 2025 · Vivek Chaudhary; Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:9530-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld a sentence less than the statutory minimum for rape under Section 376 IPC, holding that adequate and special reasons recorded by the trial court justify such sentencing and appellate interference is unwarranted absent arbitrariness.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 376 IPC rape sentence adequacy minimum sentence

Anil Kumar Jain v. National Council of Education Research and Training

30 Oct 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:9566-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the withholding of gratuity for unauthorized occupation of government quarters post-retirement but directed payment of interest on delayed release of balance dues.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant unauthorized occupation government accommodation withholding gratuity retiral dues

Jamia Hamdard Deemed to be University v. Delhi Jal Board

30 Oct 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:9580

The Delhi High Court directed the Delhi Jal Board to provide water supply to Jamia Hamdard University by March 2026, emphasizing the authority's obligation to fulfill prior commitments within a reasonable timeframe.

administrative petition_allowed water supply Delhi Jal Board public authority obligation writ petition

Rakesh Aggarwal v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation

30 Oct 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:9581

The Delhi High Court granted liberty to file an appeal against the rejection of a municipal regularization application and stayed coercive action for four weeks without expressing any opinion on the merits.

administrative other regularization application municipal corporation appeal Appellate Tribunal MCD

Nitesh Kumar Singh; Aliza Alam; Mohnish Sehrawat v. Gursharan Singh

30 Oct 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:9561-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court remanded the pay revision dispute of a retired employee back to the Tribunal for fresh consideration, emphasizing the need for natural justice and consistent application of precedents.

administrative other Significant Modified Assured Career Progression Grade Pay Pay Revision Principles of Natural Justice

Farukh Qureshi Pharuk v. State of NCT Delhi

30 Oct 2025 · Vivek Chaudhary; Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:9586-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a Habeas Corpus petition seeking production of a major woman who denied marriage and refused to live with the petitioner, affirming her right to personal liberty and independent choice.

constitutional petition_dismissed Habeas Corpus major woman personal liberty denial of marriage

Ram Kripal Singh Construction Pvt. Ltd v. Union of India

30 Oct 2025 · Sachin Datta · 2025:DHC:9596
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court directed fair adjudication of a show cause notice issued under the Integrity Pact, emphasizing procedural fairness and opportunity to be heard without staying the proceedings.

administrative petition_dismissed Integrity Pact show cause notice natural justice Independent External Monitors

MS DROPADI v. MS RINKI VERMA

30 Oct 2025 · Prateek Jalan · 2025:DHC:9578

The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court’s refusal to grant judgment on admissions under Order XII Rule 6 CPC, holding that the respondent’s written statement asserted a bona fide right to reside in the property, necessitating a trial.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XII Rule 6 CPC judgment on admissions right to residence licensee

Vaibhav Kakkar v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

30 Oct 2025 · Amit Bansal · 2025:DHC:9627

The Delhi High Court granted probate of the Will of late Shri Rakesh Bhatia to the petitioner, exempting him from furnishing a surety bond, as the beneficiaries were natural legal heirs under a welfare trust.

civil petition_allowed probate Indian Succession Act, 1925 administrative-cum-surety bond welfare trust

Patanjali Ayurved Limited v. Ujala Goel Proprietor of R.U. Overseas

30 Oct 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar · 2025:DHC:9481-DB

The Delhi High Court held that an email accepting a debit note does not necessarily admit liability if surrounding circumstances show tactical acceptance, dismissing the appeal but reducing interest awarded.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant debit note acknowledgment of debt commercial dispute territorial jurisdiction

Waseem v. State NCT of Delhi

29 Oct 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:9478

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 25(1B) of the Arms Act but reduced the sentence to the period already served by the appellant, granting leniency in sentencing.

criminal sentence_modified Arms Act, 1959 Section 25(1B) sentence reduction conviction upheld

Shree Sai Vignesh Agency v. Avato Ward 39 State Goods and Service Tax

29 Oct 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain

The Delhi High Court set aside ex-parte GST adjudication orders for lack of hearing, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of extension notifications pending before the Supreme Court.

tax remanded Significant Goods and Services Tax Section 168A Show Cause Notice Natural Justice

Mr. Manik Gupta, Mr. Mohammad Tanvir Ali v. Union of India & Ors.

29 Oct 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora

The Delhi High Court directed multiple government agencies to coordinate and submit joint action plans for redevelopment and environmental management of 27 industrial areas lacking basic sewage and drainage infrastructure.

administrative other Procedural industrial redevelopment sewage system storm water drains Delhi Pollution Control Committee

Voltas Limited v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

29 Oct 2025 · Dinesh Mehta; Vimal Kumar Yadav · 2025:DHC:9579-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a Labour Commissioner cannot issue a certificate of recovery treating an employee as reinstated without adjudication, and quashed such certificate issued beyond the terms of a binding settlement.

labor appeal_allowed Significant certificate of recovery Labour Commissioner Industrial Disputes Act 1947 Section 33(C)(1)

Employees State Insurance Corporation v. Dr Sanjay Prasad & Ors.

29 Oct 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · (2023) SCC OnLine Del 2761

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's direction to reimburse LTC air fare claims based on authorised agent fares, allowing website bookings if not exceeding authorised fares, and directed recovery of excess amounts with interest.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Leave Travel Concession LTC reimbursement Employees State Insurance Corporation Central Administrative Tribunal

Shri Neeraj Aggarwal v. Sh Gaurav Punj & Anr.

29 Oct 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:9403-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld a summary judgment for recovery of possession in a commercial tenancy dispute, holding that tenancy was validly terminated and no real prospect of defense existed, dismissing the appeal.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant summary judgment Order XIII-A CPC recovery of possession termination of tenancy