Delhi High Court

29,724 judgments

Year:

MICHAEL AND SUSAN DELL FOUNDATION v. ASSISTANT/ DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE INTERNATIONAL TAXATION 2(2)(1) NEW & ANR.

29 Oct 2025 · V. KAMESWAR RAO; VINOD KUMAR · 2025:DHC:9468-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside reassessment notices issued without considering the assessee's explanation and remanded the matter for fresh hearing and reasoned order within six weeks.

tax appeal_allowed Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 Section 148A(1) Section 148A(3)

Vinod Kumar v. Staff Selection Commission and Ors.

29 Oct 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:9428-DB

The Delhi High Court held that recruitment under the special Ex-Servicemen Commando category must strictly follow prescribed eligibility criteria and directed reworking of the merit list to include only eligible candidates, granting relief to the petitioner accordingly.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Ex-Servicemen reservation Special Action Group Commando certificate Recruitment eligibility

Mithalesh Devi v. State of NCT of Delhi & Arjun Singh Rathore

29 Oct 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:9471

The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to a mother-in-law accused of dowry harassment and causing death, emphasizing the need for specific evidence and cooperation with investigation over vague allegations.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail dowry harassment Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023

Neetu Rathaur v. State of NCT of Delhi & Arjun Singh Rathore

29 Oct 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:9472

Anticipatory bail granted to accused in dowry harassment and death case where medical evidence and investigation rebutted presumption of abetment and no specific allegations were made.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail dowry harassment death investigation Section 118 BSA

Shailender Chopra v. Air India Ltd & Anr.

29 Oct 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:9407-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is not maintainable against Air India post-privatization as it ceased to be a State entity, dismissing the appeal challenging employee dismissal.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant writ jurisdiction Article 226 privatization Air India

Sivkan Educational Society v. Delhi Development Authority & Ors.

29 Oct 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:9404-DB

The Delhi High Court held that internal approvals without formal allotment letters do not confer vested rights to land allotment, and statutory requirements including sponsorship and auction rules must be complied with, dismissing the appellant's claim for allotment of educational land.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Nazul Land Rules land allotment internal file notings vested right

Parveen Sood & Ors. v. Ashok Kumar Sood (Since Deceased Through LRs) & Ors.

29 Oct 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:9442

The Delhi High Court expunged a portion of the trial court's order inaccurately recording procedural suggestions and directed the trial court to independently consider the review application.

civil petition_allowed expungement of order bar of limitation Specific Relief Act Order XXIII Rule 1(4) CPC

Prabhat Singh Charak v. Union of India & Anr.

29 Oct 2025 · Subramonium Prasad; Saurabh Banerjee · 2025:DHC:9443-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside disciplinary penalties imposed without adherence to procedural safeguards and natural justice, directing full service benefits for the petitioner from compulsory retirement to superannuation.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant departmental enquiry disagreement note principles of natural justice Rule 15 CCS Rules

Court on Its Own Motion v. Nitin Bansal

29 Oct 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:9447-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that wilful intimidation of a Court-appointed Local Commissioner by placing a real air gun on the table during execution of a Court order constitutes criminal contempt and sentenced the contemnor to imprisonment and fine.

criminal conviction_upheld Significant criminal contempt Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Local Commissioner wilful obstruction

State (GNCT of Delhi) v. Bal Chand

29 Oct 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:9477
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a POCSO case due to material contradictions in prosecution evidence and absence of corroborative medical proof, emphasizing the double presumption of innocence in appeals against acquittal.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant POCSO Act child witness testimony sexual offence acquittal

Amarpal v. Directorate of Revenue Intelligence

29 Oct 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:9452

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to a repeat NDPS offender detained for over four years due to trial delay, emphasizing the constitutional right to liberty and speedy trial over statutory bail restrictions.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail NDPS Act commercial quantity right to speedy trial

Arvind Bhatnagar v. State; Neeti Bhatnagar

29 Oct 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:9440

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking quashing of a dowry harassment FIR due to non-fulfillment of settlement terms and dismissal of mutual consent divorce petition for non-appearance.

criminal petition_dismissed quashing of FIR Section 482 Cr.P.C. mutual consent divorce settlement enforcement

Through Mother v. State of NCT of Delhi & Gulfam Malik

29 Oct 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:9441

The Delhi High Court upheld bail granted to a father accused of sexually assaulting his minor daughter but modified the bail order to impose stringent conditions ensuring the victim's safety and preventing intimidation.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail sexual assault minor POCSO Act

K.K. Talwar v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

29 Oct 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:9449

The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR and criminal proceedings against a bona fide purchaser in a property dispute resolved by a valid settlement, holding continuation of prosecution would be an abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC cheating Section 420 IPC

Ajay Khanna & Anr. v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

29 Oct 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:9473

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 336 and 288 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC amicable settlement non-compoundable offences

Rajinder Kumar v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

29 Oct 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:9446

The Delhi High Court held that prima facie material of forged caste certificate justified framing of charges under Sections 467 and 471 IPC and dismissed the petition seeking quashing of the FIR and charges.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 482 CrPC framing of charges forgery of caste certificate Sections 467 and 471 IPC

Shekhar v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi

29 Oct 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:9453

The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of an accused in a gang-related murder case, emphasizing the gravity of the offence, eyewitness identification, and risk of witness intimidation over grounds of parity and delay in trial.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail murder gang rivalry eyewitness identification

Capital Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. v. Somesh Kumar Bishnoi

29 Oct 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna

The Delhi High Court held that non-compliance with a court-recorded settlement due to financial constraints is not wilful contempt, dismissing the contempt petition but allowing time for payment with interest.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act wilful disobedience court-recorded settlement

Union of India v. Ajay Kumar

29 Oct 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:9426-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing the Railways to grant additional increments to a sportsperson for 2007 medal-winning performances under the policies prevailing at the time, rejecting retrospective application of the 2010 Policy.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant sports quota additional increments policy supersession retrospective application

Malini Dahiya v. State (Govt. of NCT)

29 Oct 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:9435

The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to Malini Dahiya in a cheating case involving documentary evidence, holding custodial interrogation unnecessary and quashing proclamation proceedings against her.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail custodial interrogation documentary evidence Section 84 BNSS