Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

Union of India & Ors. v. Ex Po Com (EW) Munnalal

29 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9504-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's writ petition and upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's order granting disability pension to a service member injured while on duty.

administrative appeal_dismissed disability pension military service injury Armed Forces Tribunal Release Medical Board

Hemant Kumar v. Union of India

29 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9503-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the disqualification of a candidate suffering from ectasia, a LASIK surgery complication, ruling that concurrent medical findings disqualifying him under MHA guidelines cannot be challenged by fresh examination.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Detailed Medical Examination Review Medical Examination Ectasia LASIK surgery

GOVT OF NCT DELHI v. GOVT SCHOOL TEACHERS ASSOCIATION (MIGRANTS)

29 Oct 2025 · ANIL KSHETARPAL; HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR · 2025:DHC:9408-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the delayed review petition seeking pay fixation from the date of appointment, holding that delay cannot be condoned without sufficient cause and no error apparent on record justified review.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Review Petition Condonation of Delay Pay Fixation Regularization of Service

Sumit Kumar v. Union of India

29 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9508-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the disqualification of a candidate suffering from ectasia post-LASIK surgery, affirming that concurrent medical findings preclude fresh examination and that only uncomplicated LASIK surgery candidates are eligible under MHA guidelines.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Detailed Medical Examination Review Medical Examination LASIK surgery ectasia

Maharashtra Carrom Association v. Union of India

29 Oct 2025 · Mini Pushkarna

The Delhi High Court held that the unrecognized All India Carrom Federation cannot use 'India' or 'Indian' in its name or logo and must seek government recognition to claim National Sports Federation status.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant National Sports Federation Recognition All India Carrom Federation National Sports Code

Arun Sood v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

29 Oct 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:9517

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition filed on false ownership claims by a tenant evicted from the property, holding it an abuse of process and imposing costs.

civil petition_dismissed Significant writ petition abuse of process false averments ownership

Logix Heights Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 13(1), Delhi & Anr.

29 Oct 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar · 2025:DHC:9461-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the reassessment order and notice under Sections 148A and 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for AY 2019-20 and remanded the matter for fresh consideration after affording the petitioner an opportunity of hearing.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148A Section 148 Reassessment proceedings

Filatex India Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors.

29 Oct 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar · 2025:DHC:9460-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court set aside a reassessment notice issued beyond limitation and remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer to decide the surviving limitation period after hearing the assessee.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 148 Income Tax Act limitation period reassessment notice surviving limitation period

MICHAEL AND SUSAN DELL FOUNDATION v. ASSISTANT/ DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE INTERNATIONAL TAXATION 2(2)(1) NEW & ANR.

29 Oct 2025 · V. KAMESWAR RAO; VINOD KUMAR · 2025:DHC:9468-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside reassessment notices issued without considering the assessee's explanation and remanded the matter for fresh hearing and reasoned order within six weeks.

tax appeal_allowed Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 Section 148A(1) Section 148A(3)

Vinod Kumar v. Staff Selection Commission and Ors.

29 Oct 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:9428-DB

The Delhi High Court held that recruitment under the special Ex-Servicemen Commando category must strictly follow prescribed eligibility criteria and directed reworking of the merit list to include only eligible candidates, granting relief to the petitioner accordingly.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Ex-Servicemen reservation Special Action Group Commando certificate Recruitment eligibility

Mithalesh Devi v. State of NCT of Delhi & Arjun Singh Rathore

29 Oct 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:9471

The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to a mother-in-law accused of dowry harassment and causing death, emphasizing the need for specific evidence and cooperation with investigation over vague allegations.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail dowry harassment Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023

Neetu Rathaur v. State of NCT of Delhi & Arjun Singh Rathore

29 Oct 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:9472

Anticipatory bail granted to accused in dowry harassment and death case where medical evidence and investigation rebutted presumption of abetment and no specific allegations were made.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail dowry harassment death investigation Section 118 BSA

Shailender Chopra v. Air India Ltd & Anr.

29 Oct 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:9407-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is not maintainable against Air India post-privatization as it ceased to be a State entity, dismissing the appeal challenging employee dismissal.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant writ jurisdiction Article 226 privatization Air India

Sivkan Educational Society v. Delhi Development Authority & Ors.

29 Oct 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:9404-DB

The Delhi High Court held that internal approvals without formal allotment letters do not confer vested rights to land allotment, and statutory requirements including sponsorship and auction rules must be complied with, dismissing the appellant's claim for allotment of educational land.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Nazul Land Rules land allotment internal file notings vested right

Parveen Sood & Ors. v. Ashok Kumar Sood (Since Deceased Through LRs) & Ors.

29 Oct 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:9442

The Delhi High Court expunged a portion of the trial court's order inaccurately recording procedural suggestions and directed the trial court to independently consider the review application.

civil petition_allowed expungement of order bar of limitation Specific Relief Act Order XXIII Rule 1(4) CPC

Prabhat Singh Charak v. Union of India & Anr.

29 Oct 2025 · Subramonium Prasad; Saurabh Banerjee · 2025:DHC:9443-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside disciplinary penalties imposed without adherence to procedural safeguards and natural justice, directing full service benefits for the petitioner from compulsory retirement to superannuation.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant departmental enquiry disagreement note principles of natural justice Rule 15 CCS Rules

Court on Its Own Motion v. Nitin Bansal

29 Oct 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:9447-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that wilful intimidation of a Court-appointed Local Commissioner by placing a real air gun on the table during execution of a Court order constitutes criminal contempt and sentenced the contemnor to imprisonment and fine.

criminal conviction_upheld Significant criminal contempt Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Local Commissioner wilful obstruction

State (GNCT of Delhi) v. Bal Chand

29 Oct 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:9477
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a POCSO case due to material contradictions in prosecution evidence and absence of corroborative medical proof, emphasizing the double presumption of innocence in appeals against acquittal.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant POCSO Act child witness testimony sexual offence acquittal

Amarpal v. Directorate of Revenue Intelligence

29 Oct 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:9452

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to a repeat NDPS offender detained for over four years due to trial delay, emphasizing the constitutional right to liberty and speedy trial over statutory bail restrictions.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail NDPS Act commercial quantity right to speedy trial

Arvind Bhatnagar v. State; Neeti Bhatnagar

29 Oct 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:9440

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking quashing of a dowry harassment FIR due to non-fulfillment of settlement terms and dismissal of mutual consent divorce petition for non-appearance.

criminal petition_dismissed quashing of FIR Section 482 Cr.P.C. mutual consent divorce settlement enforcement