Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

Subhash Gupta and Anr v. Smt Pooja

03 Nov 2025 · Saurabh Banerjee · 2025:DHC:9797

The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction of tenants on bona fide requirement grounds under the Delhi Rent Control Act, rejecting jurisdictional and alternative accommodation objections.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Eviction petition Bona fide requirement Jurisdiction

Mohd Rais @ Rahish @ Mulla v. The State (NCT of Delhi)

03 Nov 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:9770
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that non-supply of written grounds of arrest does not render arrest illegal absent demonstrable prejudice, and upheld dismissal of bail for an accused involved in organized vehicle theft under MCOCA.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant grounds of arrest Article 22(1) Constitution of India written communication remand application

Arka Bhattacharya v. State

03 Nov 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:9768

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner’s writ seeking protection from arrest, holding that transit bail is temporary and the petitioner’s failure to surrender and prima facie involvement in organized vehicle theft syndicate negated entitlement to further protection.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant transit bail MCOCA organized crime vehicle theft

Union of India & Ors. v. 5850584 H Ex Rfn Ramesh Singh

03 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 318 (2025) DLT 711
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for optic neuropathy, affirming the presumption of service connection absent contrary proof and limiting writ interference to errors of law.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension armed forces tribunal optic neuropathy presumption of sound health

Dinesh Kumar v. Union of India & Anr.

03 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9674-DB

The petitioner withdrew the writ petition after the grievance was redressed, and the court disposed of the petition accordingly.

other other petition withdrawal grievance redressal writ petition petition disposed

Vipin Katariya & Anr. v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

03 Nov 2025 · Vivek Chaudhary; Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:9699-DB

The Delhi High Court directed continued investigation and periodic reporting in a missing person case, refusing to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus to produce the missing wife at this stage.

criminal petition_dismissed Habeas Corpus missing person investigation Article 226

Shadab Ali & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

03 Nov 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:9643

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act based on an amicable settlement between matrimonial parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute amicable settlement

MS Krrish Realtech Pvt Ltd v. Union of India

03 Nov 2025 · Sachin Datta · 2025:DHC:9653

The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging Provisional Attachment Orders under the PMLA, holding that statutory remedies before the Adjudicating Authority and Appellate Tribunal are available and must be exhausted before invoking writ jurisdiction.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 Provisional Attachment Order Adjudicating Authority Appellate Tribunal

Sukhinder Bir Singh v. State of Delhi & Anr.

03 Nov 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:9644
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The High Court partially quashed charges under Sections 354A and 354D IPC for vagueness but allowed trial under Section 509 IPC to proceed, emphasizing the need for prima facie material at charge framing stage.

criminal other Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. Section 354A IPC Section 354D IPC Section 509 IPC

Pankaj Kakkar & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

03 Nov 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:9634

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 498A IPC following an amicable settlement and divorce between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 498A IPC Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR amicable settlement

Shakuntla Health Education Foundation v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

03 Nov 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:9667

The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition challenging MCD demolition action, granting interim protection and directing the petitioner to file a statutory appeal before the now-functional Appellate Tribunal.

administrative appeal_allowed demolition order Municipal Corporation of Delhi Appellate Tribunal MCD interim relief

M/S. STAR ENTERPRISES v. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI

03 Nov 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:9666

The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the MCD to consider the petitioner's grievances through a personal hearing and pass a speaking order within six weeks, treating the petition as a representation.

administrative petition_dismissed writ petition parking plots encroachment jurisdiction dispute

Sandeep Dhanuka v. Directorate of Revenue Intelligence & Anr.

03 Nov 2025 · Sachin Datta · 2025:DHC:9654

The Delhi High Court quashed a Look Out Circular issued against a petitioner in absence of any pending cognizable offence, holding that such restriction violates the fundamental right to travel and must comply with Ministry of Home Affairs guidelines.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Look Out Circular LOC Customs Act, 1962 cognizable offence

Shashi Arora & Anr. v. State Through Commissioner of Police & Ors.

03 Nov 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:9642
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR and proceedings against distant relatives in a dowry harassment case due to lack of concrete evidence of cruelty or criminal breach of trust, emphasizing restraint against over-implication under Section 498A IPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 498A IPC cruelty over-implication inherent jurisdiction

Om Prakash v. State of NCT of Delhi

03 Nov 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:9640

The Delhi High Court set aside charges against the petitioner for death by negligence and destruction of evidence, holding that mere ownership and uncorroborated co-accused statements do not establish a prima facie case.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant framing of charge Section 304A IPC criminal negligence prima facie case

Abid v. State (NCT of Delhi)

03 Nov 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Amit Sharma · 2025:DHC:9620-DB
Cites 6 · Cited by 0

Delhi High Court dismissed appeals challenging convictions for murder under Section 302 IPC, affirming the reliability of eyewitness testimony and corroborative evidence establishing appellants' common intention and participation.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant eyewitness testimony common intention Section 302 IPC murder conviction

Inderpreet Singh Wadhwa v. Union of India & Ors.

03 Nov 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:9663

The Delhi High Court suspended the Look-Out-Circular against a foreign national director during ongoing corporate fraud investigation, balancing investigatory interests with his right to travel subject to stringent conditions.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Look-Out-Circular Companies Act, 2013 Section 210(1)(c) Section 217

Arjun v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi

03 Nov 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:9662

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a serious sexual assault case under BNS and POCSO Act, balancing prolonged custody and trial stage against prosecution interests with stringent bail conditions.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant regular bail sexual assault Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 POCSO Act

X v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

03 Nov 2025 · Sachin Datta · 2025:DHC:9651

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition on grounds of lack of territorial jurisdiction and pending proceedings before the Punjab and Haryana High Court, emphasizing the doctrine of forum conveniens and strict compliance with limitation under the POSH Act.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant territorial jurisdiction Article 226 POSH Act sexual harassment

Pushkar Raj & Anr. v. Jawaharlal Nehru University & Ors.

03 Nov 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:9660

The Delhi High Court upheld cross-constituency voting in JNU's Internal Committee elections, dismissing the petition challenging last-minute rule changes as neither arbitrary nor prejudicial.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Internal Complaints Committee cross-constituency voting election rules doctrine of no rule change