Delhi High Court

29,724 judgments

Year:

Sukhinder Bir Singh v. State of Delhi & Anr.

03 Nov 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:9644
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The High Court partially quashed charges under Sections 354A and 354D IPC for vagueness but allowed trial under Section 509 IPC to proceed, emphasizing the need for prima facie material at charge framing stage.

criminal other Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. Section 354A IPC Section 354D IPC Section 509 IPC

Pankaj Kakkar & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

03 Nov 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:9634

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 498A IPC following an amicable settlement and divorce between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 498A IPC Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR amicable settlement

Shakuntla Health Education Foundation v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

03 Nov 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:9667

The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition challenging MCD demolition action, granting interim protection and directing the petitioner to file a statutory appeal before the now-functional Appellate Tribunal.

administrative appeal_allowed demolition order Municipal Corporation of Delhi Appellate Tribunal MCD interim relief

M/S. STAR ENTERPRISES v. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI

03 Nov 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:9666

The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the MCD to consider the petitioner's grievances through a personal hearing and pass a speaking order within six weeks, treating the petition as a representation.

administrative petition_dismissed writ petition parking plots encroachment jurisdiction dispute

Sandeep Dhanuka v. Directorate of Revenue Intelligence & Anr.

03 Nov 2025 · Sachin Datta · 2025:DHC:9654

The Delhi High Court quashed a Look Out Circular issued against a petitioner in absence of any pending cognizable offence, holding that such restriction violates the fundamental right to travel and must comply with Ministry of Home Affairs guidelines.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Look Out Circular LOC Customs Act, 1962 cognizable offence

Shashi Arora & Anr. v. State Through Commissioner of Police & Ors.

03 Nov 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:9642
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR and proceedings against distant relatives in a dowry harassment case due to lack of concrete evidence of cruelty or criminal breach of trust, emphasizing restraint against over-implication under Section 498A IPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 498A IPC cruelty over-implication inherent jurisdiction

Om Prakash v. State of NCT of Delhi

03 Nov 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:9640

The Delhi High Court set aside charges against the petitioner for death by negligence and destruction of evidence, holding that mere ownership and uncorroborated co-accused statements do not establish a prima facie case.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant framing of charge Section 304A IPC criminal negligence prima facie case

Abid v. State (NCT of Delhi)

03 Nov 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Amit Sharma · 2025:DHC:9620-DB
Cites 6 · Cited by 0

Delhi High Court dismissed appeals challenging convictions for murder under Section 302 IPC, affirming the reliability of eyewitness testimony and corroborative evidence establishing appellants' common intention and participation.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant eyewitness testimony common intention Section 302 IPC murder conviction

Inderpreet Singh Wadhwa v. Union of India & Ors.

03 Nov 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:9663

The Delhi High Court suspended the Look-Out-Circular against a foreign national director during ongoing corporate fraud investigation, balancing investigatory interests with his right to travel subject to stringent conditions.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Look-Out-Circular Companies Act, 2013 Section 210(1)(c) Section 217

Arjun v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi

03 Nov 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:9662

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a serious sexual assault case under BNS and POCSO Act, balancing prolonged custody and trial stage against prosecution interests with stringent bail conditions.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant regular bail sexual assault Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 POCSO Act

X v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

03 Nov 2025 · Sachin Datta · 2025:DHC:9651

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition on grounds of lack of territorial jurisdiction and pending proceedings before the Punjab and Haryana High Court, emphasizing the doctrine of forum conveniens and strict compliance with limitation under the POSH Act.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant territorial jurisdiction Article 226 POSH Act sexual harassment

Pushkar Raj & Anr. v. Jawaharlal Nehru University & Ors.

03 Nov 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:9660

The Delhi High Court upheld cross-constituency voting in JNU's Internal Committee elections, dismissing the petition challenging last-minute rule changes as neither arbitrary nor prejudicial.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Internal Complaints Committee cross-constituency voting election rules doctrine of no rule change

Paramjit Kharb v. The State (NCT of Delhi)

03 Nov 2025 · Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:9638

The Delhi High Court dismissed bail applications of accused involved in a large-scale cyber-fraud syndicate, holding that sufficient prima facie evidence and the gravity of offences preclude bail at this stage.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant bail cyber-fraud forged identity bank accounts

SI Rakesh Kumar v. BIMLA

03 Nov 2025 · Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:9637
Cites 5 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court set aside bail granted to accused in an inter-state child trafficking case, emphasizing the gravity of offence, risk of evidence tampering, and non-application of judicial mind by the Trial Court.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant child trafficking bail cancellation inter-state crime syndicate destruction of evidence

Mohd Arif v. Amit Chaudhary & Anr.

03 Nov 2025 · Saurabh Banerjee · 2025:DHC:9585

The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant's revision petition, affirming eviction on grounds of bona fide requirement and established landlord-tenant relationship under the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Eviction Petition Bona fide requirement Landlord-tenant relationship

Om Saran Gupta v. State of NCT of Delhi & Nishi

03 Nov 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:9635

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC against a petitioner whose marriage was declared null and void, holding that vague allegations without essential ingredients do not constitute offences and the proceedings were an abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 498A IPC criminal breach of trust Section 406 IPC quashing of FIR

Rasul Azam v. The State (Govt of NCT), Delhi & Anr.

03 Nov 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:9665
Cites 6 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for sexual offences under the POCSO Act, holding that the victim's age was conclusively proved by school records and testimony, and the prosecution established foundational facts to invoke statutory presumptions.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant POCSO Act age determination school records Section 29 POCSO

Aman Chopra & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr

03 Nov 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:9645

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR amicable settlement Section 482 CrPC non-compoundable offences

Anil Singh v. State

03 Nov 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:9636

The High Court held that a Magistrate cannot summon an accused placed in Column No.12 of the chargesheet without new evidence, setting aside the impugned summoning order as an impermissible review of the earlier cognizance.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 319 Cr.P.C. summoning accused Column No.12 chargesheet

Suparshva Swabs India v. AGN International & Ors.

03 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9625-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging refusal of interim injunction, holding that the plaintiff failed to establish goodwill in the mark "TULIPS" extending to perfumes and that the defendants’ use of "AGN TULIP" does not constitute infringement or passing off.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant trademark infringement passing off interim injunction generic mark