Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

Neha Malav v. Dean (Admissions Branch), University of Delhi & Ors.

03 Nov 2025 · Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2025:DHC:9749-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that courts will not direct fresh counselling rounds after admission closure, especially where the candidate scored below the last cut-off marks.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant University admissions Counselling rounds Vacancy disclosure Cut-off marks

CRPL Infra Private Limited & Anr. v. Ministry of Food Processing Industries, Government of India

03 Nov 2025 · Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2025:DHC:9728-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal directing reconsideration of grant eligibility under the PMKSY Scheme, holding that only pre-EOI expenditure can be excluded and that denial based on project nearing completion or finality clauses is arbitrary and unsustainable.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant grant-in-aid Scheme for Creation/Expansion of Food Processing and Preservation Capacities Pradhan Mantri Kishan Sampada Yojna Expression of Interest

Vedanta Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 25(1)

03 Nov 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:9714-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the reassessment order under Section 148A(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and remanded the matter for fresh consideration in light of a subsequent GST order closing proceedings on the same issue.

tax other Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148A Input Tax Credit GST Intelligence

Dr. Aditya Sehrawat v. Union of India and Ors.

03 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9701-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the transfer of a paramilitary medical officer, holding that adequate medical facilities exist at the new posting and that transfer orders should not be interfered with absent violation of guidelines or extreme hardship.

administrative petition_dismissed transfer order paramilitary forces medical treatment liver transplant

Dr Aniruddha Narayan Malpani v. The Union of India & Anr.

03 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9691-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging an appointment as infructuous after the term of the appointed member expired.

constitutional petition_dismissed writ of quo warranto appointment challenge expiry of term infructuous petition

Parag Prakash Rudrangi v. State

03 Nov 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:9641
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR alleging rape on false promise of marriage due to prolonged consensual relations, inconsistencies, and lack of corroborative evidence, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 376 IPC false promise of marriage consent vitiated by misconception

Mangal Singh Rawat v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

03 Nov 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:9710

The Delhi High Court granted the petitioner liberty to appeal against a demolition order and stayed coercive action for eight weeks without expressing any opinion on the merits.

administrative petition_dismissed Demolition Order Municipal Corporation of Delhi Appellate Tribunal MCD Unauthorized construction

Aman Carriers v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd & Anr.

03 Nov 2025 · Sachin Datta · 2025:DHC:9702

The Delhi High Court set aside IOCL's holiday listing of a vendor for an inadvertent bid format error, holding that blacklisting requires a valid show cause notice and cannot be imposed without due process.

administrative petition_allowed Significant holiday listing blacklisting show cause notice natural justice

Union of India & Ors. v. MWO Surendra Kumar Retd

03 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 318 (2025) DLT 711
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's petition and upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension to a retired Air Force personnel suffering from Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that such disability is attributable to military service unless rebutted by clear evidence.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Primary Hypertension Armed Forces Tribunal Release Medical Board

Jaya v. Union of India

03 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9676-DB

The Delhi High Court permitted withdrawal of a writ petition to enable filing a fresh petition with the correct prayer clause, disposing the original petition as withdrawn.

constitutional other writ petition withdrawal of petition prayer clause amendment

Shriram General Insurance Company Ltd. v. Ashok Kumar & Ors.

03 Nov 2025 · Prateek Jalan · 2025:DHC:9690

The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company’s appeal against a motor accident compensation award, upholding 100% functional disability assessment and attendant charges for gratuitous family care.

civil appeal_dismissed motor accident claim functional disability loss of earnings attendant charges

Mukesh Kumar Verma v. Union of India & Anr.

03 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9679-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a BSF disciplinary charge sheet, holding that courts should not interfere with valid disciplinary proceedings unless jurisdictional defects or absence of misconduct are shown.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disciplinary proceedings charge sheet Border Security Force Act 1968 misconduct

M/S SHIV TOBACCO CO. v. VINOD KUMAR

03 Nov 2025 · C. HARI SHANKAR; OM PRAKASH SHUKLA · 2025:DHC:9675-DB

The High Court of Delhi allowed the appellants to withdraw their appeal and disposed of the matter accordingly.

civil other Procedural appeal withdrawal disposal of appeal leave to withdraw High Court of Delhi

M/S Tharu and Sons Pvt Ltd v. Divisional Railway Manager Northern Railways

03 Nov 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:10492
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that at the stage of appointing an arbitrator under Section 11, the Court's role is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and arbitrability disputes must be decided by the arbitrator.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration agreement Section 11 Arbitration Act arbitrability prima facie examination

Sh. Ravinder Goel v. Sh. Ashwani Arora

03 Nov 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:10317
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, the court’s role is limited to prima facie satisfaction of an arbitration agreement’s existence and appointed an arbitrator accordingly.

civil petition_allowed Significant Section 11 Arbitration and Conciliation Act appointment of arbitrator prima facie examination arbitration agreement

Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. P.R. Thareja Prop Goldy Constructions Company and Anr

03 Nov 2025 · Nitin Wasudeo Sambre; Anish Dayal · 2025:DHC:10061-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed MCD's appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration Act, upholding the arbitral award and affirming limited judicial interference in arbitration matters.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Section 37 arbitral award

Poonawalla Fincorp Limited v. Up Money Limited & Ors.

03 Nov 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:9895

The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator and directed arbitration proceedings under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, dismissing the petition for interim relief and leaving all substantive issues to be decided by the arbitrator.

civil other Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 9 interim relief Section 17 application Facility Agreement breach

Hakam Rai Takkar v. State (Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi)

03 Nov 2025 · Amit Bansal · 2025:DHC:9866

The Delhi High Court granted probate to the petitioner as Executor of a duly executed Will under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 in an uncontested proceeding.

civil petition_allowed Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276 probate Will execution

Dr. Kirti Sharma v. Dr. Kapil Parasha

03 Nov 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:9680

The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's dismissal of a perjury complaint in matrimonial proceedings, holding that minor contradictory statements do not warrant prosecution under Section 340 CrPC unless expedient in the interest of justice.

family appeal_dismissed Significant Section 340 CrPC perjury false statements matrimonial proceedings

Deepak @ Nishu v. State (NCT of Delhi)

03 Nov 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:9822

The High Court modified the appellant's conviction from attempt to murder under Section 307 IPC to causing grievous hurt under Section 308 IPC, upheld conviction under Section 201 IPC, and reduced the sentence to the period already served.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 307 IPC Section 201 IPC Section 308 IPC intention to cause death