Delhi High Court

29,724 judgments

Year:

Spice Jet Ltd v. Union of India; LG Electronic India Private Limited v. Union of India

04 Nov 2025 · The Chief Justice; Tushar Rao Gedela; Devendra Kumar Upadhya... · 2025:DHC:9670-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of notifications applying the Employees' Provident Fund Scheme to International Workers with certain modifications, rejecting claims of discrimination and ultra vires delegation.

labor petition_dismissed Significant Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 International Workers Article 14 discrimination

Pranab Thareja v. Pallav Thareja

04 Nov 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:9681

The Delhi High Court held that in partition suits where the plaintiff is in possession, court fees is fixed and not to be calculated on market value or sale consideration, setting aside the trial court’s order demanding additional court fees.

civil appeal_allowed Significant court fees partition suit valuation of suit sale consideration

Zen Linen International Pvt Ltd v. M/S. India Exhibitions

04 Nov 2025 · Nitin Wasudeo Sambre; Anish Dayal · 2025:DHC:9673
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal in a commercial recovery suit due to insufficient evidence by the appellant's representative lacking personal knowledge and non-joinder of a necessary party essential for adjudication.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Special Power of Attorney Non-joinder of necessary party Burden of proof Indian Evidence Act Section 58

Rohit & Anr v. The State

04 Nov 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:9703

The Delhi High Court modified the appellants' conviction from Section 304 Part I to Part II IPC, holding that death was caused with knowledge but without intention to cause death, and reduced their sentences accordingly.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 304 IPC culpable homicide intention vs knowledge danda injury

Utsav Tomar v. Union of India and Ors

04 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9733-DB

The Delhi High Court transferred a writ petition to the Central Administrative Tribunal for adjudication, following the Supreme Court's ruling that such matters fall within the Tribunal's jurisdiction.

administrative other Central Administrative Tribunal Writ Petition Transfer L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India

Anita Kaul v. State of NCT of Delhi

04 Nov 2025 · Vikas Mahajan · 2025:DHC:9763

The Delhi High Court allowed passport renewal for ten years and permission to depart India to a petitioner facing pending criminal proceedings, relying on a recent government Office Memorandum relaxing passport restrictions under the Passport Act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant passport renewal pending criminal proceedings Section 6(2)(f) Passport Act Office Memorandum 06.12.2024

Mr. Shivam Tiwari v. 685219 WO Yashpal Singh Retd

04 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 318 (2025) DLT 711
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's petition and upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising during service are service-related unless proven otherwise by the employer.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Primary Hypertension Armed Forces Tribunal Release Medical Board

Univlabs Technologies v. Union of India & Ors.

04 Nov 2025 · Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2025:DHC:9750-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging technical bid rejection in a concluded tender, emphasizing the limits of judicial review and the importance of timely legal recourse in public procurement.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant judicial review tender process technical bid rejection MSME policy

Mohd. Faisal & Anr. v. State of NCT & Anr.

04 Nov 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:9698

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 323, 341, 427, and 34 IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC amicable settlement non-compoundable offences

Vinod Kumar Kataria v. CVO MOC and Ors.

04 Nov 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:9646-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Lokpal's order dismissing a corruption complaint as administrative irregularities, emphasizing limited judicial interference under Article 226 in expert statutory inquiries.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013 Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Article 226 Constitution judicial review

Vikram Singh Chauhan v. Arnab Goswami

04 Nov 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:9684

The Delhi High Court quashed defamation proceedings against media persons and company directors, holding that a company cannot be held liable for defamation and directors cannot be criminally liable without specific allegations of personal involvement, while balancing freedom of speech and right to reputation.

criminal petition_allowed Significant defamation Section 499 IPC Section 500 IPC corporate liability

Atul Mohan v. Punjab National Bank

03 Nov 2025 · Avneesh Jhingan · 2025:DHC:9639

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging termination for prolonged unauthorized absence, holding that absence without substantiated medical cause and failure to join duty justifies dismissal under bank disciplinary regulations.

labor petition_dismissed unauthorized absence termination of service disciplinary enquiry compelling circumstances

Neha Malav v. Dean (Admissions Branch), University of Delhi & Ors.

03 Nov 2025 · Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2025:DHC:9749-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that courts will not direct fresh counselling rounds after admission closure, especially where the candidate scored below the last cut-off marks.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant University admissions Counselling rounds Vacancy disclosure Cut-off marks

CRPL Infra Private Limited & Anr. v. Ministry of Food Processing Industries, Government of India

03 Nov 2025 · Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2025:DHC:9728-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal directing reconsideration of grant eligibility under the PMKSY Scheme, holding that only pre-EOI expenditure can be excluded and that denial based on project nearing completion or finality clauses is arbitrary and unsustainable.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant grant-in-aid Scheme for Creation/Expansion of Food Processing and Preservation Capacities Pradhan Mantri Kishan Sampada Yojna Expression of Interest

Vedanta Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 25(1)

03 Nov 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:9714-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the reassessment order under Section 148A(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and remanded the matter for fresh consideration in light of a subsequent GST order closing proceedings on the same issue.

tax other Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148A Input Tax Credit GST Intelligence

Dr. Aditya Sehrawat v. Union of India and Ors.

03 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9701-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the transfer of a paramilitary medical officer, holding that adequate medical facilities exist at the new posting and that transfer orders should not be interfered with absent violation of guidelines or extreme hardship.

administrative petition_dismissed transfer order paramilitary forces medical treatment liver transplant

Dr Aniruddha Narayan Malpani v. The Union of India & Anr.

03 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9691-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging an appointment as infructuous after the term of the appointed member expired.

constitutional petition_dismissed writ of quo warranto appointment challenge expiry of term infructuous petition

Parag Prakash Rudrangi v. State

03 Nov 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:9641
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR alleging rape on false promise of marriage due to prolonged consensual relations, inconsistencies, and lack of corroborative evidence, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 376 IPC false promise of marriage consent vitiated by misconception

Mangal Singh Rawat v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

03 Nov 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:9710

The Delhi High Court granted the petitioner liberty to appeal against a demolition order and stayed coercive action for eight weeks without expressing any opinion on the merits.

administrative petition_dismissed Demolition Order Municipal Corporation of Delhi Appellate Tribunal MCD Unauthorized construction

Aman Carriers v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd & Anr.

03 Nov 2025 · Sachin Datta · 2025:DHC:9702

The Delhi High Court set aside IOCL's holiday listing of a vendor for an inadvertent bid format error, holding that blacklisting requires a valid show cause notice and cannot be imposed without due process.

administrative petition_allowed Significant holiday listing blacklisting show cause notice natural justice