Delhi High Court

29,724 judgments

Year:

Union of India & Ors. v. MWO Surendra Kumar Retd

03 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 318 (2025) DLT 711
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's petition and upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension to a retired Air Force personnel suffering from Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that such disability is attributable to military service unless rebutted by clear evidence.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Primary Hypertension Armed Forces Tribunal Release Medical Board

Jaya v. Union of India

03 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9676-DB

The Delhi High Court permitted withdrawal of a writ petition to enable filing a fresh petition with the correct prayer clause, disposing the original petition as withdrawn.

constitutional other writ petition withdrawal of petition prayer clause amendment

Shriram General Insurance Company Ltd. v. Ashok Kumar & Ors.

03 Nov 2025 · Prateek Jalan · 2025:DHC:9690

The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company’s appeal against a motor accident compensation award, upholding 100% functional disability assessment and attendant charges for gratuitous family care.

civil appeal_dismissed motor accident claim functional disability loss of earnings attendant charges

Mukesh Kumar Verma v. Union of India & Anr.

03 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9679-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a BSF disciplinary charge sheet, holding that courts should not interfere with valid disciplinary proceedings unless jurisdictional defects or absence of misconduct are shown.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disciplinary proceedings charge sheet Border Security Force Act 1968 misconduct

M/S SHIV TOBACCO CO. v. VINOD KUMAR

03 Nov 2025 · C. HARI SHANKAR; OM PRAKASH SHUKLA · 2025:DHC:9675-DB

The High Court of Delhi allowed the appellants to withdraw their appeal and disposed of the matter accordingly.

civil other Procedural appeal withdrawal disposal of appeal leave to withdraw High Court of Delhi

M/S Tharu and Sons Pvt Ltd v. Divisional Railway Manager Northern Railways

03 Nov 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:10492
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that at the stage of appointing an arbitrator under Section 11, the Court's role is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and arbitrability disputes must be decided by the arbitrator.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration agreement Section 11 Arbitration Act arbitrability prima facie examination

Sh. Ravinder Goel v. Sh. Ashwani Arora

03 Nov 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:10317
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, the court’s role is limited to prima facie satisfaction of an arbitration agreement’s existence and appointed an arbitrator accordingly.

civil petition_allowed Significant Section 11 Arbitration and Conciliation Act appointment of arbitrator prima facie examination arbitration agreement

Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. P.R. Thareja Prop Goldy Constructions Company and Anr

03 Nov 2025 · Nitin Wasudeo Sambre; Anish Dayal · 2025:DHC:10061-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed MCD's appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration Act, upholding the arbitral award and affirming limited judicial interference in arbitration matters.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Section 37 arbitral award

Poonawalla Fincorp Limited v. Up Money Limited & Ors.

03 Nov 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:9895

The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator and directed arbitration proceedings under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, dismissing the petition for interim relief and leaving all substantive issues to be decided by the arbitrator.

civil other Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 9 interim relief Section 17 application Facility Agreement breach

Hakam Rai Takkar v. State (Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi)

03 Nov 2025 · Amit Bansal · 2025:DHC:9866

The Delhi High Court granted probate to the petitioner as Executor of a duly executed Will under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 in an uncontested proceeding.

civil petition_allowed Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276 probate Will execution

Dr. Kirti Sharma v. Dr. Kapil Parasha

03 Nov 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:9680

The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's dismissal of a perjury complaint in matrimonial proceedings, holding that minor contradictory statements do not warrant prosecution under Section 340 CrPC unless expedient in the interest of justice.

family appeal_dismissed Significant Section 340 CrPC perjury false statements matrimonial proceedings

Deepak @ Nishu v. State (NCT of Delhi)

03 Nov 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:9822

The High Court modified the appellant's conviction from attempt to murder under Section 307 IPC to causing grievous hurt under Section 308 IPC, upheld conviction under Section 201 IPC, and reduced the sentence to the period already served.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 307 IPC Section 201 IPC Section 308 IPC intention to cause death

Subhash Gupta and Anr v. Smt Pooja

03 Nov 2025 · Saurabh Banerjee · 2025:DHC:9797

The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction of tenants on bona fide requirement grounds under the Delhi Rent Control Act, rejecting jurisdictional and alternative accommodation objections.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Eviction petition Bona fide requirement Jurisdiction

Mohd Rais @ Rahish @ Mulla v. The State (NCT of Delhi)

03 Nov 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:9770
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that non-supply of written grounds of arrest does not render arrest illegal absent demonstrable prejudice, and upheld dismissal of bail for an accused involved in organized vehicle theft under MCOCA.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant grounds of arrest Article 22(1) Constitution of India written communication remand application

Arka Bhattacharya v. State

03 Nov 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:9768

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner’s writ seeking protection from arrest, holding that transit bail is temporary and the petitioner’s failure to surrender and prima facie involvement in organized vehicle theft syndicate negated entitlement to further protection.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant transit bail MCOCA organized crime vehicle theft

Union of India & Ors. v. 5850584 H Ex Rfn Ramesh Singh

03 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 318 (2025) DLT 711
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for optic neuropathy, affirming the presumption of service connection absent contrary proof and limiting writ interference to errors of law.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension armed forces tribunal optic neuropathy presumption of sound health

Dinesh Kumar v. Union of India & Anr.

03 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9674-DB

The petitioner withdrew the writ petition after the grievance was redressed, and the court disposed of the petition accordingly.

other other petition withdrawal grievance redressal writ petition petition disposed

Vipin Katariya & Anr. v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

03 Nov 2025 · Vivek Chaudhary; Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:9699-DB

The Delhi High Court directed continued investigation and periodic reporting in a missing person case, refusing to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus to produce the missing wife at this stage.

criminal petition_dismissed Habeas Corpus missing person investigation Article 226

Shadab Ali & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

03 Nov 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:9643

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act based on an amicable settlement between matrimonial parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute amicable settlement

MS Krrish Realtech Pvt Ltd v. Union of India

03 Nov 2025 · Sachin Datta · 2025:DHC:9653

The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging Provisional Attachment Orders under the PMLA, holding that statutory remedies before the Adjudicating Authority and Appellate Tribunal are available and must be exhausted before invoking writ jurisdiction.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 Provisional Attachment Order Adjudicating Authority Appellate Tribunal